Magnum Announcement

Nicksta195

Guest
As soon as your invasion started we ceased all activities. Because we we knew the south would rally up against us, hence we didn't go for massive stacks up north.
When news reached us about the current gangbang, we were nothing but glad of our decission.

So no, you still did very poorly.

Once again you contradict yourself. Only a few hours ago you were whining on how you were being gangbanged and it was unfair.

I am tired of hearing about Puffins "Offensive" game that we are yet to see. You guys seem more like procrastinators than anything else right now. When you actually hit us with that big strike than we will see.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Shouldn't the tribe that declared be winning?

A declaration is merely an inevitable war made public, its a shame you have felt the need to address this topic in two threads, I was under the impression I'd made things clear to you in the other thread, I suppose not. :icon_neutral:

Might as well put it simple, Magnum saw Puffin as a threat. Magnum had reason to believe Puffin were aware of the plans and as such had put some forms of plans together, as such Puffin were equally prepared for this war.

Both tribes had support commited elsewhere in seperate wars (a LOT of Magnum defense was hanging with RON until 2-3 days into the Puffin war) and Puffin were enjoying steamrollering A2A and co. It will be interested to see how things go now troops are moving down from K46 and some frontline deadweight has been shifted, granted the introduction of Crayn makes things lopsided, unfortunately there is little I can do about that. :)
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Once again you contradict yourself. Only a few hours ago you were whining on how you were being gangbanged and it was unfair.

I am tired of hearing about Puffins "Offensive" game that we are yet to see. You guys seem more like procrastinators than anything else right now. When you actually hit us with that big strike than we will see.

Play the game you in the way you like, it's what we plan on doing. Why would we even bother stretching ourselves thin? Nicely done, you have just proven to know jack all about TW.
 

Nicksta195

Guest
Play the game you in the way you like, it's what we plan on doing. Why would we even bother stretching ourselves thin? Nicely done, you have just proven to know jack all about TW.

Out of all people you would know about egging them on. Attempting to get someone to do something stupid doesn't mean you don't know Jack.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
'Inactives'/people you kicked to improve the stats after they were targeted, you mean. Oh well, at least we don't abandon our members.

Side 1:
Tribes: PuFFiN
Players:

Side 2:
Tribes: Magnum
Players: kokobest 99Hawk6spd

Timeframe: Last week

Total conquers:

Side 1: 149
Side 2: 100
Difference: 49

image.php


Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 28
Side 2: 11
Difference: 17

image.php


Points value of total conquers:

Side 1: 1,303,436
Side 2: 911,748
Difference: 391,688

image.php


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 289,237
Side 2: 84,719
Difference: 204,518

image.php



Side 1:
Tribes:
Players: kokobest 99Hawk6spd

Side 2:
Tribes: PuFFiN
Players:

Timeframe: Last week

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 0
Side 2: 23
Difference: 23

image.php


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 0
Side 2: 242,843
Difference: 242,843

image.php



Your point is?

Side 1:
Tribes: Magnum
Players:

Side 2:
Tribes: PuFFiN
Players:

Timeframe: Last week

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 12
Side 2: 26
Difference: 14

image.php




 

DeletedUser

Guest
Side 1:
Tribes:
Players: kokobest 99Hawk6spd

Side 2:
Tribes: PuFFiN
Players:

Timeframe: Last week

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 0
Side 2: 23
Difference: 23

image.php


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 0
Side 2: 242,843
Difference: 242,843

image.php



Your point is?

Side 1:
Tribes: Magnum
Players:

Side 2:
Tribes: PuFFiN
Players:

Timeframe: Last week

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 12
Side 2: 26
Difference: 14

image.php





My point being that even though you abandon your members when they come under fire, we don't, and your tribe were doing pretty appalling considering you had the time to prepare and declare.

Heck, at least CRayn. did some planning and got all their villages pre-stacked.



And if you consider the stats together, as them two (unlike the others you kicked) were actually active:

Side 1:
Tribes: PuFFiN
Players:

Side 2:
Tribes: Magnum
Players: 99Hawk6spd kokobest

Timeframe: Last week

Total conquers:

Side 1: 147
Side 2: 90
Difference: 57

image.php


Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 33
Side 2: 12
Difference: 21

image.php


Points value of total conquers:

Side 1: 1,288,869
Side 2: 816,345
Difference: 472,524

image.php


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 337,978
Side 2: 93,747
Difference: 244,231

image.php
 

Nicksta195

Guest
Unless you have a spy in our council you don't know our full reasons for kicking the members we did. There is a difference between abandoning someone and dismissing them because they are inactive.

The stats favor Puffin pretty heavily IF you count those members who haven't been a part of our tribe for days and you are still trying to include.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
My point being that even though you abandon your members when they come under fire, we don't, and your tribe were doing pretty appalling considering you had the time to prepare and declare.

Heck, at least CRayn. did some planning and got all their villages pre-stacked.



And if you consider the stats together, as them two (unlike the others you kicked) were actually active:

Side 1:
Tribes: PuFFiN
Players:

Side 2:
Tribes: Magnum
Players: 99Hawk6spd kokobest

Timeframe: Last week

Total conquers:

Side 1: 147
Side 2: 90
Difference: 57

image.php


Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 33
Side 2: 12
Difference: 21

image.php


Points value of total conquers:

Side 1: 1,288,869
Side 2: 816,345
Difference: 472,524

image.php


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 337,978
Side 2: 93,747
Difference: 244,231

image.php

Just becuase it shows 12 conquesr on the Magnum side doesn't mean those players made any conquers, if you look at the two players vs. puffin without magnum you see they have no conquers = inactive.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Unless you have a spy in our council you don't know our full reasons for kicking the members we did. There is a difference between abandoning someone and dismissing them because they are inactive.

The stats favor Puffin pretty heavily IF you count those members who haven't been a part of our tribe for days and you are still trying to include.

Your tribe already announced the reasons on the forum, why would we need a council spy?

You claimed they were abandoning the accounts in poor condition, to sitters who didn't want/couldn't cope with the hassle of being targetted. And they were not inactive, don't pull that.

Just becuase it shows 12 conquesr on the Magnum side doesn't mean those players made any conquers, if you look at the two players vs. puffin without magnum you see they have no conquers = inactive.

Or you could do what anyone with a brain would do, and consider the attacks they sent and looking at TW Stats to see if Magnum were internally nobling them for being 'inactive'... which they weren't. Use your brain :icon_wink:
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Theres no point arguing, Puffin will continue to add our dismissed inactives into the stats just to make them look better for themselves.
 

xyziz

Guest
Sure kokobest may have been inactive, and that is a viable excuse. Yet then you must also take into account that these players were under the Magnum Tag when attacks were launched on them (Most, not sure about some of the later ones, but it does take a few days from some attacks to reach)

Yet if you look at This:

image.php


It is VERY clear that this person is/was atleast somewhat active while in your tribe at the time of the attacks.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Sure kokobest may have been inactive, and that is a viable excuse. Yet then you must also take into account that these players were under the Magnum Tag when attacks were launched on them (Most, not sure about some of the later ones, but it does take a few days from some attacks to reach)

Yet if you look at This:

image.php


It is VERY clear that this person is/was atleast somewhat active while in your tribe at the time of the attacks.

No you've got it all wrong ziz, that player's ODA rose because he was so inactive the game sent attacks for him. :lol:
 

DeletedUser

Guest
All the graph shows is that he sent a nuke or two about once a week, doesn't take much activity to send a nuke...
 

Nicksta195

Guest
I will honestly say that Kokobest was red when attacks started on him so I am not positive the time of that graph, but he definetly wasn't sending Nukes recently. Unless he became active again after being kicked from Magnum.
 
Top