in the case of eviction, his losses weren't a loss for FRST because FRST weren't using those villages. The villages WMD lost, they may have nobled them back to the same amount, though FRST is still in a better position in the end.
FRST gained 78 villages, eviction lost 50, but they weren't being used by FRST, so they don't lose anything there.
WMD lost 78 villages, that they were using.
It's a simple case of very similar to barb nobling to try and stay alive in war. You may keep the same amount of villages, but when you start doing that you have already lost, as you can't really fight back from that point. It's just delaying the inevitable when you do that.
So what i'm saying is, FRST didn't lose any ground because of eviction, we tried him, and dismissed him, no gain, no loss, we were simply back to where we started. WMD however have lost alot of ground from these conquers, as they were against the active players, and WMD controlled villages on the frontline.
basically FRST moved straight forward into WMD, and WMD attacked someone on to the right. in the end, you haven't stopped FRST, or even done anything against FRST (in terms of eviction)