Marching for 20 Days and 20 Nights

DeletedUser

Guest
didnt you quit or something?
or are you just haunting the externals :)
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Daily Update

PITA + -KP- vs. U N M

[spoil]Side 1:
Tribes: PITA, -KP-
Players: shagohad
Side 2:
Tribes: U N M
Players: Zedesia, ALFIE01, Trojan Taff

Timeframe: 05/01/2012 00:00:00 to 15/01/2012 18:30:21

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 91
Side 2: 38
Difference: 53

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 494,835
Side 2: 167,057
Difference: 327,778

chart
[/spoil]

Last post i added 5 villages of Athurugau because he is no longer active. I was wrong adding all 5 villages because 3 of them were taken while he was in =x. Therefore only 2 villages should be added to PITA's totals.

Totals for PITA + -KP- vs. U N M:
PITA + -KP- = 93
U N M = 38

PITA vs. U N M

[spoil]Side 1:
Tribes: PITA
Side 2:
Tribes: U N M
Players: Zedesia, ALFIE01, Trojan Taff

Timeframe: 05/01/2012 00:00:00 to 15/01/2012 18:30:21

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 49
Side 2: 6
Difference: 43

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 267,472
Side 2: 23,647
Difference: 243,825

chart
[/spoil]

Again i only have to add 2 more villages so the totals are:

PITA = 51
U N M = 6



-KP- vs. U N M

[spoil]Side 1:
Tribes: -KP-
Players: shagohad
Side 2:
Tribes: U N M
Players: Zedesia, ALFIE01, Trojan Taff

Timeframe: 05/01/2012 00:00:00 to 15/01/2012 18:30:21

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 42
Side 2: 32
Difference: 10

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 227,363
Side 2: 143,410
Difference: 83,953

chart
[/spoil]


Let me know if anything needs to be fixed
Thanks,
Hende
 

DeletedUser

Guest
New update, unfortunately Zedesia and Athurugau cant be added anymore due to deletion... im not sure how many more villas that adds to the penguins tally but it dont matter too much...

Stats are as follows:


Penguins vs U N M
[SPOIL] Side 1:
Tribes: -KP-, PITA
Players: shagohad
Side 2:
Tribes: U N M
Players: ALFIE01, Trojan Taff

Timeframe: 05/01/2012 21:20:00 to 17/01/2012 08:19:00

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 99
Side 2: 39
Difference: 60

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 552,500
Side 2: 178,109
Difference: 374,391

chart




[/SPOIL]


PITA vs U N M
[SPOIL] Side 1:
Tribes: PITA
Side 2:
Tribes: U N M
Players: ALFIE01, Trojan Taff

Timeframe: 05/01/2012 21:20:00 to 17/01/2012 08:19:00

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 52
Side 2: 6
Difference: 46

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 283,149
Side 2: 23,647
Difference: 259,502

chart




[/SPOIL]


-KP- vs U N M
[SPOIL] Side 1:
Tribes: -KP-
Players: shagohad
Side 2:
Tribes: U N M
Players: ALFIE01, Trojan Taff

Timeframe: 05/01/2012 21:20:00 to 17/01/2012 08:19:00

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 47
Side 2: 33
Difference: 14

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 269,351
Side 2: 154,462
Difference: 114,889

chart
[/SPOIL]

http://www.twstats.com/en59/index.php?page=player&mode=conquers&id=9457581

That would be 9 villages from Athurugau and on Zedesia it is.

http://www.twstats.com/en59/index.php?page=player&mode=conquers&type=lose&id=4491936

Another 11, so thats 20 more on top of what was in your post predator. That would make the count

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 119
Side 2: 39
Difference: 80


:icon_biggrin:
 

AxlTheCat

Guest
Conquers on zedesia were while he was a member of UNM, so are already included in the stats. Looks like 2 conquers on Athurugau while he was tribeless, those could be added to the total.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Conquers on zedesia were while he was a member of UNM, so are already included in the stats. Looks like 2 conquers on Athurugau while he was tribeless, those could be added to the total.

Thanks mate for correcting the stats.

You took 4 of zadesia's villages so i think u remember that he was a member of U N M while nobled.
 

Deleted User - 4669627

Guest
Anthills Vs. Pita, -KP- and Light.

[spoil]Side 1:
Players: Anthills
Side 2:
Tribes: -KP-, PITA, Light.

Timeframe: 05/01/2012 00:00:00 to 22/01/2012 13:48:40

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 8
Side 2: 6
Difference: 2

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 28,785
Side 2: 25,951
Difference: 2,834

chart
[/spoil]
with that being said, i am done with w59 for the time being
maybe i will return one day and join shave anonymously
should be very easy considering how much recruiting they do
 

DeletedUser

Guest
with that being said, i am done with w59 for the time being
maybe i will return one day and join shave anonymously
should be very easy considering how much recruiting they do

Haters Failures gonna hate.
 

Deleted User - 4669627

Guest
my goal was to create a tribe that had a chance to win the world without...

hugging

[spoil]it is public knowledge we had no diplomacy at all[/spoil]
mass-recruiting

[spoil]only 1 top 10 tribe recruited less than mine[/spoil]
leadership lying to the leadership of other tribes or betraying agreements

[spoil]if some leader of some other tribe accuses me, shahz, or googly of lying to them, by all means speak up[/spoil]
cheating

[spoil]who in my tribe cheated?[/spoil]
we did have a chance to win, i was personally winning (check the above stats)

so, if you succeed at all your goals, you are a failure?
 

DeletedUser

Guest
[spoil]my goal was to create a tribe that had a chance to win the world without...

hugging

[spoil]it is public knowledge we had no diplomacy at all[/spoil]
mass-recruiting

[spoil]only 1 top 10 tribe recruited less than mine[/spoil]
leadership lying to the leadership of other tribes or betraying agreements

[spoil]if some leader of some other tribe accuses me, shahz, or googly of lying to them, by all means speak up[/spoil]
cheating

[spoil]who in my tribe cheated?[/spoil]
we did have a chance to win, i was personally winning (check the above stats)

so, if you succeed at all your goals, you are a failure?[/spoil]

image.php

Ummmmm, yup. Looks like losing to me. Unless you consider yourself a winner. Guess you win a thumbs up and a cookie for wasting time. :icon_rolleyes:
 

Deleted User - 4669627

Guest
i am still missing what you are saying

i did not create a tribe that had a chance to win? i mass-recruited? i hugged? i betrayed agreements? we cheated?

which goal did i fail at?
 

DeletedUser

Guest
i am still missing what you are saying

i did not create a tribe that had a chance to win? i mass-recruited? i hugged? i betrayed agreements? we cheated?

which goal did i fail at?

You're dead = you failed.
honestly can't put it any simpler then that so if you don't understand that, good luck finding someone to explain it in simpler terms for you.


A 100 point player can succeed at those aforementioned things, doesn't mean they're a winner. /facepalm

edit: (by you're I mean your tribe)
 

Deleted User - 4669627

Guest
normanthecat is a failure? :icon_eek:

wickerman is a failure? :icon_eek:

erasmus is a failure? :icon_eek:

axlthecat is a failure? :icon_eek:

i could keep naming people who you define to be a failure

fyi, i am not calling any of the above people a failure (except wickerman)
finny is calling them all failures cuz their original tribes "died"

You're dead = you failed.
edit: (by you're I mean your tribe)
btw, i never said i was a winner

i said i was personally winning in the war that this thread pertains to, and the stats proved it
i said i succeeded at the goalS i publicly declared, and have yet to see that denied

i guess, i could see how you could think i was claiming to be a winner considering the above
if somebody is winning their war stats and achieving every goal they publicly declared, i could see how you could interpret that as being a winner

but then you claim i am not a winner, so i do not follow your logic at all

and this...

A 100 point player can succeed at those aforementioned things, doesn't mean they're a winner. /facepalm

please name the 100 point player who created a tribe that did not cheat, mass-recruit, that had zero diplomacy, whose leadership did not lie to other tribes' leaderships or break their agreements, yet still had a chance to win?

i am guessing you are shave?

if you have a chance to win without mass-recruiting, why do you recruit more than any other tribe?
if you have a chance to win without diplomacy, why bother with so much of it?
if you could win without lying, why sully your name?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DeletedUser

Guest
normanthecat is a failure? :icon_eek:

wickerman is a failure? :icon_eek:

erasmus is a failure? :icon_eek:

axlthecat is a failure? :icon_eek:

i could keep naming people who you define to be a failure

fyi, i am not calling any of the above people a failure (except wickerman)
finny is calling them all failures cuz their original tribes "died"


btw, i never said i was a winner

i said i was personally winning in the war that this thread pertains to, and the stats proved it
i said i succeeded at the goalS i publicly declared, and have yet to see that denied

i guess, i could see how you could think i was claiming to be a winner considering the above
if somebody is winning their war stats and achieving every goal they publicly declared, i could see how you could interpret that as being a winner

but then you claim i am not a winner, so i do not follow your logic at all

and this...



please name the 100 point player who created a tribe that did not cheat, mass-recruit, that had zero diplomacy, whose leadership did not lie to other tribes' leaderships or break their agreements, yet still had a chance to win?

i am guessing you are shave?

if you have a chance to win without mass-recruiting, why do you recruit more than any other tribe?
if you have a chance to win without diplomacy, why bother with so much of it?
if you could win without lying, why sully your name?

In which way axl is a failure ? A player who relocated soo many ks and still kicking ass in 2nd rank. Axl wasnt CAN leadership as far as i know. If axl is a failure, 99.99% of the world is. Dont jsut keep adding everyone to the list just because you are a failure.

You are in a league of yours mister with the greats like balubhai etc
 

DeletedUser

Guest
my goal was to create a tribe that had a chance to win the world without...

so, if you succeed at all your goals, you are a failure?

if you succeed at all your goals, you are a failure? - No.

But did you succeed at your goals? :icon_rolleyes:

win the world
i did not create a tribe that had a chance to win? i mass-recruited? i hugged? i betrayed agreements? we cheated?

which goal did i fail at?


which goal did you fail at? create a tribe that had a chance to win?
ofcourse you may not think so, but most people think differently.

and fyi, not hugging=/= no diplomacy


I'm not saying you should be called a failure, I'm just saying your logic for not being failure is flawed.
Also, an honest advice: if you are quitting, leave quietly and peacefully. Try earning the respect of players, who knows you may find them to be in your tribe in another world. For if you are trying to do this, its not working.
But thats just my 0.02$
 

DeletedUser

Guest
In which way axl is a failure ? A player who relocated soo many ks and still kicking ass in 2nd rank. Axl wasnt CAN leadership as far as i know. If axl is a failure, 99.99% of the world is. Dont jsut keep adding everyone to the list just because you are a failure.

You are in a league of yours mister with the greats like balubhai etc

+1

And with regards to Axl, he should get more respect for nobling on the other side of the world and still remaining in Rank 2
That is success....

Shahyd achieved nothing, but gained haters :lol:
 

DeletedUser

Guest
It's Official

Jan 22
19:39 The tribe Equinox (disbanded) was defeated.


Penguins won, now time to chase down the runners :)
 
Top