-MM- Slaughtering Tutti Thread (war)

DeletedUser102906

Guest
truth is that mm is not "killing" or "destroying" us,we are just in tactical retreat...what??? :icon_eek::icon_biggrin:
i think i said it once but will repeat myself,where can we sing our surrender and capitulation? o_O
and do we need to kiss you guys in the a.. or is that optional ? :icon_eek:
 

DeletedUser

Guest
CapownedU said:
I perhaps have bragged a bit... I will say that honestly. In my bragging I have never attacked the players in tutti individually, but more as a tribe. Reset is right, this is a thread for -MM- vs Tutti. If we want to flame MoM anymore, or vice versa, make a thread for it.

Sorry to the Tutti members if I hurt any feelings or you felt less of a person after reading some comments. Perhaps I can comfort you with a shoulder to lean on. Maybe a back scratch? Good luck the rest of the way and keep up the good fight.
Click to expand...

Not realy seeing how slandering Tutti as a tribe is better in contrast to slandering individual players. Reset was saying that this was a -MM- chest-beating thread.

Anyway, still waiting on an opprotunity for MM show their true potential, not just hide behind Rukoh and co.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Majestic Manta said:
Likely not. Dying to a tribe that hides behind W2V must be embarrassing for them.
Click to expand...

This probably helps
[spoil]
en56
[/spoil]
 

DeletedUser95593

Guest
It's funny because it's MoM players calling other tribes recruit whores.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Glynjack said:
Do you want some vinegar for that chip on your shoulder?
Click to expand...

Glyn, using advanced terminology doesn't mean the meaning of "umadbro?" changes. I'm seeing a trend amoung W2V/MM: cold facts are meet with umadbro etc.


Choco Death said:
It's funny because it's MoM players calling other tribes recruit whores.
Click to expand...

The diffrence is -MM-'s success is almost solely reliant on recruitment whoring.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
And MoM's entire failure was down to recruit whoring.

Take a lesson from MM of how to do recruiting properly and not just for points
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Glynjack said:
And MoM's entire failure was down to recruit whoring.

Take a lesson from MM of how to do recruiting properly and not just for points
Click to expand...

Funny how pretty much all of those players ran from MoM when we were in trouble. You think they wont do the same with -MM-. Your statement is so ridden with logical fallacies its not even funny.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
No logical fallacies. The only thing you have done is make assumptions about you think "may" happen in the future whilst my statement was based on actual observations of events that DID happen

You're not a scientist, are you?
 

DeletedUser100410

Guest
Damutantman said:
He is active, he is logging in and defending. Just because he does so poorly or he is not on everyday like a decent player, doesn't mean he is not active.
Click to expand...

i hate to repeat things cause you may look stupid but here i will give it another try

i sent a nuke to one of his villages, 12 hours away

i cleared

the day after i sent ONE noble from a village 3 hours from it
i got lazy
the day after i sent it again, and 6 hours later i sent it again, i went to sleep

this noble had an escort of only 1600 axes and 600 KC
so the day after i sent it again, two times, i went to sleep
so the day after that, i sent it again and i took the villages

and you say he is active...yeah...you re doing great!!! excellent challenge!!! well done!!!

2Stoned2Care said:
Not realy seeing how slandering Tutti as a tribe is better in contrast to slandering individual players. Reset was saying that this was a -MM- chest-beating thread.

Anyway, still waiting on an opprotunity for MM show their true potential, not just hide behind Rukoh and co.
Click to expand...

So you are basicly saying that MoM are (were) a bunch of noobs and did not measure MM true potential?

Side 1:
Tribes: -MM-
Side 2:
Tribes: MoM

Timeframe: Forever

Total conquers:

Side 1: 11,040
Side 2: 25,807
Difference: 14,767

chart


Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 1,272
Side 2: 386
Difference: 886

chart


Points value of total conquers:

Side 1: 86,462,935
Side 2: 213,413,234
Difference: 126,950,299

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 12,103,478
Side 2: 3,715,031
Difference: 8,388,447

chart
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DeletedUser102906

Guest
once again orsio putting MM caps on extarnals :/
were you even playing this world when MM made those caps? :)
 

DeletedUser100410

Guest
No i wasnt, but i am talking about -MM-, not about me. So whats your point? I like stats and have posted stats from other tribes too, or you need to be part of the stats to post them? Is that a new rule for the forum or you just say the first thing that came to your mind?
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Choco Death said:
It's funny because it's MoM players calling other tribes recruit whores.
Click to expand...

Anyone who was in MoM at the time would know i was quite vocal about how against the recruitment i was. Also, just because MoM may have at one point, doesn't make it any less true for -MM- now.

Glynjack said:
And MoM's entire failure was down to recruit whoring.

Take a lesson from MM of how to do recruiting properly and not just for points
Click to expand...

really? considering 4 of those 6 were former MoM recruits, how is it recruiting for points when MoM did it, but recruiting right now that it is -MM-?

As for the other two:
[spoil]Side 1:
Players: Duke211, Martian Undesirable
Side 2:
Tribes: -MM-

Timeframe: Forever

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 36
Side 2: 24
Difference: 12

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 325,154
Side 2: 226,891
Difference: 98,263

chart
[/spoil]

orsio said:
So you are basicly saying that MoM are (were) a bunch of noobs and did not measure MM true potential?
[spoil]
Side 1:
Tribes: -MM-
Side 2:
Tribes: MoM

Timeframe: Forever

Total conquers:

Side 1: 11,040
Side 2: 25,807
Difference: 14,767

chart


Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 1,272
Side 2: 386
Difference: 886

chart


Points value of total conquers:

Side 1: 86,462,935
Side 2: 213,413,234
Difference: 126,950,299

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 12,103,478
Side 2: 3,715,031
Difference: 8,388,447

chart
[/spoil]
Click to expand...

im pretty sure this was already gone over. most of -MM-'s caps were against two inactive accounts. (not including hawk/legend, s/he just sucked)
 

DeletedUser67005

Guest
tiger32k said:
im pretty sure this was already gone over. most of -MM-'s caps were against two inactive accounts. (not including hawk/legend, s/he just sucked)
Click to expand...

We attacked the players who attacked us, thats how the conflict started. How can these players have been inactive when it was them who provoked us? Unless you're talking about how they became inactive after what we did to them.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
tiger32k said:
Anyone who was in MoM at the time would know i was quite vocal about how against the recruitment i was. Also, just because MoM may have at one point, doesn't make it any less true for -MM- now.

really? considering 4 of those 6 were former MoM recruits, how is it recruiting for points when MoM did it, but recruiting right now that it is -MM-?
Click to expand...

It's a funny situation, and I think illustrates exactly good recruitment vs bad recruitment, specifically because they are the same players. They didn't work in MoM, why not? They will work in -MM- why? (You can debate this all you like, hindsight will show that I am correct and we can revisit this at that point)

Good recruitment isn't really about the players size or ability level, or even their previous loyalty levels. Good recruitment involves a large number of important factors but one is more important than all the rest. Is the leadership willing and capable of successfully making the new member an integral part of their new tribe?

If you just randomly recruit someone, no matter who they are, of course it is a bad recruit. Loyalty isn't automatically given, nor should it be. It's the leaderships job to instill loyalty in the members they bring onto the team.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top