Name Change Needed For AFK?

going2killu

Well-Known Member
Reaction score
60
I talked with Gracie around the time everything with DS went down, she never acted embarrassed by kul, she said he made the game fun. She disliked slacker very much, and was very disappointed with how the world played out.
 
I-AM-GROOT

I-AM-GROOT

Still Going Strong
Reaction score
663
going2killu said:
I talked with Gracie around the time everything with DS went down, she never acted embarrassed by kul, she said he made the game fun. She disliked slacker very much, and was very disappointed with how the world played out.
Click to expand...

You realize this is 118 not 111? or are you taking the same "happy" pills as Kul?
 
Kül Tigin

Kül Tigin

Well-Known Member
Reaction score
61
I deleted my acc on 111 because I would not attack the players who had supported me in the fight against our enemies. It is very hypocritical to blame me a quitter for this and that. I cant accept dishonesty in any way. I dont like to play under any brand other than Khan due to these kind of things. In Khan I lead the way. If I have power, I resist, if not I die fighting, or I quit.

And in this world, I was not force internalled or ‘rimmed’. I gave permission them to take my villages with only exception of greedy cornetto not taking which was not followed.

Either afk leadership has no power of their members, or they have no honor to follow just one wish of a player who decided to give acc sit instead of leaving it open for takings in the corner of a fight.
 
Last edited:

Guesswhosback

Active Member
Reaction score
121
Kül Tigin said:
I deleted my acc on 111 because I would not attack the players who had supported me in the fight against our enemies. It is very hypocritical to blame me a quitter for this and that. I cant accept dishonesty in any way. I dont like to play under any brand other than Khan due to these kind of things. In Khan I lead the way. If I have power, I resist, if not I die fighting, or I quit.

And in this world, I was not force internalled or ‘rimmed’. I gave permission them to take my villages with only exception of greedy cornetto not taking which was not followed.

Either afk leadership has no power of their members, or they have no honor to follow just one wish of a player who decided to give acc sit instead of leaving it open for takings in the corner of a fight.
Click to expand...

The villages do not belong to you, they belong to the tribe and the leadership give internals away. Maybe you would know that if you actually played in a tribe since w7.
 
Kül Tigin

Kül Tigin

Well-Known Member
Reaction score
61
Guesswhosback said:
The villages do not belong to you, they belong to the tribe and the leadership give internals away. Maybe you would know that if you actually played in a tribe since w7.
Click to expand...

This is a response to what?

And what the hell is "since w7"... Are you high on too much crystal, and disabled since w54?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top