New Survey

[MichielK]

i dont like the deserver a rank one cause if a tribe deserved a high rank they would have one and same for a lower rank

I disagree. There are many ways to gain a temporary advantage in rank: mass-recruitment, merging, not eating inactives. However, these do not advance the tribe as a whole. The "deserves a ... rank" question allows us to indicate who got their rank the right way, and who got it the wrong way.

STAR (who already renamed themselves twice this week) is a good example. They merged and recruited themselves into the top 10, but are clearly inferior to some of the tribes below them. Ad Inf is 6th but losing by a wide margin in their first war ever. On the other hand, a tribe like Dust is holding their own against a much bigger foe.

STAR and Ad Inf deserve a lower rank, while Dust deserves a higher rank. If I'm right about this, it's only a matter of time until it happens...and that's what the question is about, IMO.

 

[DeletedUser]

Dust will lose ranks, have no fear. :icon_twisted:

 

[DeletedUser]

Survey voting is closed. Thanks to those who voted, check out the results!

 

[DeletedUser]

who put me as their favourite poster? lol, you must be crazy :icon_razz:

 

[MichielK]

Well, looks like going to war doesn't help your popularity :lol:

10. Who is your favorite forum poster?
Seagryfn 17 23.94%
MichielK 16 22.54%

Congrats Seagryfn!

 

[DeletedUser37644]

who put me as their favourite poster? lol, you must be crazy :icon_razz:

I love your wheelchair... :icon_redface:

 

[DeletedUser]

I love your wheelchair... :icon_redface:

LOL fair one :icon_razz: i was gonna say my posts are usually drunken ramblings/ useless posts.... much like this one pmsl :icon_wink:

 

[DeletedUser54400]

3. Which top 10 tribe do you believe will be next to declare war on a different top 10 tribe?

Plight 59 83.10%

I guess the different implies we can't declare on ourselves agian ? :icon_sad:

 

[DeletedUser]

No no, go ahead, it'd still be against a top 10 tribe.

 

[DeletedUser]

Well, looks like going to war doesn't help your popularity :lol:

10. Who is your favorite forum poster?
Seagryfn 17 23.94%
MichielK 16 22.54%

Congrats Seagryfn!

After in depth analysis, I have come to the conclusion that seag is the favourite forum poster for two reasons:

1) Seag is a woman.
2) Most PnP W16 users are male.

I bet you anything Seag, violett and Salvkas voted for you MK :icon_biggrin:

 

[MichielK]

After in depth analysis, I have come to the conclusion that seag is the favourite forum poster for two reasons:

1) Seag is a woman.
2) Most PnP W16 users are male.

I bet you anything Seag, violett and Salvkas voted for you MK :icon_biggrin:

Yeah, coz women are well known for their appreciation of fat balding workaholic :icon_rolleyes:

 

[DeletedUser45021]

I voted? Nuwai

Grats @ Seagryfn ^^

 

[DeletedUser]

I disagree. There are many ways to gain a temporary advantage in rank: mass-recruitment, merging, not eating inactives. However, these do not advance the tribe as a whole. The "deserves a ... rank" question allows us to indicate who got their rank the right way, and who got it the wrong way.

STAR (who already renamed themselves twice this week) is a good example. They merged and recruited themselves into the top 10, but are clearly inferior to some of the tribes below them. Ad Inf is 6th but losing by a wide margin in their first war ever. On the other hand, a tribe like Dust is holding their own against a much bigger foe.

STAR and Ad Inf deserve a lower rank, while Dust deserves a higher rank. If I'm right about this, it's only a matter of time until it happens...and that's what the question is about, IMO.

yeh your right actually

 

[Seagryfn]

Yeah, coz women are well known for their appreciation of fat balding workaholic :icon_rolleyes:

LOL, ummn, actually, yes. Professor Martie Haselton, UCLA, on the qualities women seek in a partner - "women are attracted to men who look as if they have wealth or the ability to acquire it, and that both men and women strongly value intelligence in a mate." :icon_wink: The only place where physical attractiveness wins out is in speed-dating trials. Once you get past initial first impressions, then work ethic, intelligence and honesty become the most highly desired qualities. Besides... I did vote for you. :icon_smile:

 

[MichielK]

LOL, ummn, actually, yes. Professor Martie Haselton, UCLA, on the qualities women seek in a partner - "women are attracted to men who look as if they have wealth or the ability to acquire it, and that both men and women strongly value intelligence in a mate." :icon_wink: The only place where physical attractiveness wins out is in speed-dating trials. Once you get past initial first impressions, then work ethic, intelligence and honesty become the most highly desired qualities. Besides... I did vote for you. :icon_smile:

Unless you're claiming that fat balding workaholics are generally richer and more intelligent than other men, I'm not sure Professor Haselton disagrees with me :icon_wink:

Thanks for the vote...we cancelled eachother out! :icon_biggrin: