[OFFICIAL] T:V/2 Offers Complete Immunity

  • Thread starter Thread starter Amazon Jim
  • Start date Start date
Who are these NRAA kiddy clowns? Most TV members are bigger than that entire tribe... Don't you kiddies know underage smoking is illegal, especially the kind of stuff you must be smoking to be posting the delusional utter shite you are.... How about you don't post any more until you get back from your trip?
 
Wait! May I have some of that they smoking, first! I am adult, LOL! :icon_razz:
 
outlands, you mock us, but when we are nobling your villages and won't let you leave your tribe you'll be sorry.
 
Perhaps we should just noble them and steal their stash?! :icon_twisted:
 
A :nobleman: is used to capture enemy villages. He reduces loyalty by 20-35. Lower the enemies loyalty enough and you get the village, basically.

You only know what points are. I doubt you have ever heard of a :axemen: .
 
A :nobleman: is used to capture enemy villages. He reduces loyalty by 20-35. Lower the enemies loyalty enough and you get the village, basically.

You only know what points are. I doubt you have ever heard of a :axemen: .

Ask the Smurfs if we know what an :axemen: is.

Also, a guarentee: By the time the war ends, you will have nobled zero Vigil villages.
 
You all think because of our pts we suck. We'll show you all! When the end of this war comes, I bet we will have nobled the most T:V villages for our pts.
 
Didn't I told you today, I like your high morale. But we have something better - we have "iqbal" - high morale + insureness in a victory, permanently. Where did I found this word, anyway? :icon_rolleyes:
 
Please define 'victory' as perhaps we understand it to mean different things?

If your meaning of 'victory' is NRAA members winning the race to the rim assisted by T:V and allies by getting there faster than anyone else, then I agree with you.

My definition of 'victory' means 'winning the war' and that means finishing it with more villages than when you started, having left your enemy with less or none.... by that definition about the only 'enemy' NRAA might be able to beat is abandoneds.
 
However hells,, because there's 149 of us, and we are nobling easy T:V villages, we will grow faster than you. Therefore we will overtake you soon.

Outlands, my definition of victory is this: T:V and T:V2 disbanded, or left with 0 villages between them. NRAA will contribute significantly towards this goal.
 
However hells,, because there's 149 of us, and we are nobling easy T:V villages, we will grow faster than you. Therefore we will overtake you soon.

Outlands, my definition of victory is this: T:V and T:V2 disbanded, or left with 0 villages between them. NRAA will contribute significantly towards this goal.

I just checked out TW Plus:

NRAA:

» 155 conquers [117 conquered / 38 lost]

NONE of T:V villages ever captured, on 8 pages.
 
That's because we only just declared! Nobles take a while to move you know!
 
However hells,, because there's 149 of us, and we are nobling easy T:V villages, we will grow faster than you. Therefore we will overtake you soon.

Outlands, my definition of victory is this: T:V and T:V2 disbanded, or left with 0 villages between them. NRAA will contribute significantly towards this goal.

That's false. We have over 1300 villages, which means the capacity for 1300 nobles, aka 1300 new villages. You have 351 villages, meaning 351 nobles, or 351 new villages (and this is assuming that all of your players have nobles, but realistically you have only about 90 members who have an academy.

AJ: Request approved. :)
 
Hells, but each of your villages cannot be given the indivual attention that ours can. As we have lots of members with 1 village, they can focus on that village, thereas because each of your members has like 90 villages, they just queue in some troops and go on to the next village, because sending out farming runs etc would take forever.

Also, when a member of your tribe quits, it hurts you badly. We can afford to have members quitting.

Also, you suffer morale penalties when attacking smaller villages- we don't.

Therefore, we will grow faster.
 
Back
Top