DeletedUser
Guest
of course, I will enjoy then as much as you have done till now with the only diference that I wont have to build them up (as certain person did), after all they are FF loot
of course, I will enjoy then as much as you have done till now with the only diference that I wont have to build them up (as certain person did), after all they are FF loot
DeletedUser
Guest
this time you are wrong, Hightower.
Check RIP, beantown and mine OD as defenders. Also check Tabasco and his gang OD as defenders.
There´s been heavy crossfire before they quit (I had a village exchange with tabasco when he still was in DR). I don´t know if they had decided it for RL, but they DID send everything they had on us before... so they don´t count as abandons for FF
Last edited by a moderator:
DeletedUser
Guest
They are abandon right now right? So why are you attacking them?
Its bad tactics, and gains you nothing in the war, I promise they won't be attacking you anymore...
Are you sure we are playing the same game?
DeletedUser
Guest
indeed we are, there is something called control key locations you know :icon_rolleyes: , it would be quite more expensive to invade a continent like we are doing in K45, by taking active players rather than setup forward bases via big abadoned villages (which as I told are kind of a loot for us).
btw I have checked your twplus as well, we have taken technically the same ammount of abandones, but please do check he points of the abadons you have taken and compare them with mine, unlike you I dont see anything wrong in taking big abandons if you are going to give them a nice use.
Last edited by a moderator:
DeletedUser
Guest
So let me get this straight. For Simplicity, we will use easy and not accurate numbers.
Lets say FF1 is nobling all these abandoneds at a 1+1 speed. Now lets say the C.A. is nobling villages at a 1+1 speed off of FF1. We'll say each tribe has 50 villages to start out with.
CA: 50+1+1+1+1+1 = 55
FF1: 50+1-1+1-1+1-1+1-1+1-1 = 50
Do you understand yet why everyone is making fun of you for nobling abandoneds? The C.A. is getting stronger off of you whilst you stay the same size. Again, those are not accurate numbers, but it's the easy to understand logic I am getting at.
DeletedUser
Guest
Do you understand yet why everyone is making fun of you for nobling abandoneds? The C.A. is getting stronger off of you whilst you stay the same size. Again, those are not accurate numbers, but it's the easy to understand logic I am getting at.
Actually CA is nobling TAIWAN abandoned villages as well...........
DeletedUser
Guest
If you checked twplus, they you saw that I'm engaging the enemy, not the abandons.
Even if you add in all of the TAIWAIN abandons to FF's score, it still sucks, how do you explain that?
DeletedUser
Guest
Lets do the math:
FF takes 463 live towns and 155 TAIWAN abandons
ROA takes 1035 live towns, and I don't count the abandons
FF is many times larger that its enemy, FF surrounds its enemy.
ROA is outnumbered by its enemy, and fights on a southern front.
FF is 451 players, ROA is 75 players.
Now, try to skew the facts to show how FF knows what they are doing?
Trust me when I say this, you can't win a war, by not attacking the enemy.
FF takes 463 live towns and 155 TAIWAN abandons
ROA takes 1035 live towns, and I don't count the abandons
FF is many times larger that its enemy, FF surrounds its enemy.
ROA is outnumbered by its enemy, and fights on a southern front.
FF is 451 players, ROA is 75 players.
Now, try to skew the facts to show how FF knows what they are doing?
Trust me when I say this, you can't win a war, by not attacking the enemy.
DeletedUser
Guest
I hope you dont mean there attack troops, sorry but if you do I cant watch you blindly lie like that, you obviously dont know how many Taiwan villages I cleared out, not just defensive troops but offense also.
DeletedUser
Guest
Hightower allow to clear some points for you:
1. We are indeed larger, but we dont surround the enemy.
2. I dont know how come fighting in a southern front is going to influence your way of fighting, but CA are more clustered than OTB is in your area, and their players are quite experienced and large, I would like to see if ROA's performance is the same in a situation similar to ours.
And here are some other points that perhaps arent clear enough for you:
taiwan left DR but didnt quit
MASSIVE numbers of attacks were received after they left DR
And we are taking them now because they lost lots of troops while they were actively fighting us, so the villages are pretty easy to take.
I know that no one can win a war only by taking abandons, but who said thats all we do? In fact you havent seen nothing yet, just wait, till now even the CA is focusing more on abandons.
mikey, we are aware that you were attacking fewels, in fact fewels was the only one that didnt took large part in massive attacks against us, but I do know we dealt the greatest part of damage to tabasco, terrly, vieri, righting and the other minor TAIWAN members.
Last edited by a moderator:
DeletedUser
Guest
I cleared about 10 O armies of them also. A lot more D armies.
I am sure many others will have their own share so seriously I doubt they threw all at FF.
DeletedUser
Guest
So let me get this straight. For Simplicity, we will use easy and not accurate numbers.
Lets say FF1 is nobling all these abandoneds at a 1+1 speed. Now lets say the C.A. is nobling villages at a 1+1 speed off of FF1. We'll say each tribe has 50 villages to start out with.
CA: 50+1+1+1+1+1 = 55
FF1: 50+1-1+1-1+1-1+1-1+1-1 = 50
Do you understand yet why everyone is making fun of you for nobling abandoneds? The C.A. is getting stronger off of you whilst you stay the same size. Again, those are not accurate numbers, but it's the easy to understand logic I am getting at.
Let me preface the following statement by saying this...I think RIP is a bit loony, and I don't agree with what he is saying.
I've read your post 3 times, and I still have absolutely no idea what you're saying. I'm a well educated man, have done quite well in any logic class or test I've ever been involved in...and I must say your easy to understand logic has left me completely befuddled.
DeletedUser
Guest
How many nobles did you see TAIWAN members sent to your villages? Friend's villages?
Did your tribe lose any villages to TAIWAN members?
DeletedUser
Guest
they sent more than 40 nobles to me, all disguissed in the 3k of incomings I had, I lost 2 villages, I retook one and the other one was retaken by a fellow tribemate, I killed like 1million troops in just a weekend, and Im not counting the attacks on my friends, who killed also lots of troops.
headhunter@
Guest
i "guess" what he is trying to say...
assuming both teams ennobled 10 villages and each started off with 50 villages
if teamA only ennobles abandons (not enemies) and TeamB only ennobles enemies then
teamAvillageCount = 50+10-10 -> 50 <---- the minus from villages lost to teamB
while teamBVillageCount = 50 + 10 -> 60 <--- the plus from ennobling teamA's
DeletedUser
Guest
Unless you are fighting France.
imori
Guest
Man Hightower, thats some great talking coming from you towards your allies... Are you SURE your not against FF?
DeletedUser
Guest
imori, disagreeing with someone is not an "attack" on them
it is merely a discussion point
it is merely a discussion point
DeletedUser
Guest
No, but I am extremely disappointed in FF, and their continued campaign against the CA. Even now that its finally been admitted that OTB wasn't the reason to engage the CA, but instead a desire to see them gone, you continue to try and escalate the war.
In particular, I am not please with the recent attempts, by FF, to bring more tribes into the war against the CA. Particularly since the tribes in question have no idea what the war is about, or that they were sitting right next to a CA tribe (ROA), and would be destroyed the minute they declared.
In addition, we are not allied with FF, we have a NAP. Although the way we treat NAPS, is how most tribes treat allies, the fact is we have a NAP not an alliance.
DeletedUser
Guest
We (FF) didnt attemped to bring tribes against ROA, sorry but your sources are wrong.
