Fansy
Guest
haha 'because of inactive player' is just clumsy excuse XD
haha 'because of inactive player' is just clumsy excuse XD
Go check his stats on TWstats like I said too. It clearly shows his point growth completely stopped before he was hit. You say it's an excuse. TWstats says it's the hard truth. Now check the stats of all of our front line guys. See how their point growth hasn't stopped? Noticed how none of them were rimmed? The answers are right in front of you. Just because you choose to ignore them, doesn't mean they are wrong.
I think you might have missed his point - it's to say that if you have an inactive member in your tribe, it's your responsibility to clean that up. In war, it doesn't matter if your player was inactive or not, (s)he was your player.
Also, to address your previous post about twisting stats - I'm not sure if you were referring to my post as well, but I specifically titled it saying 'a week on' from when you declared. In that week, MEA seems to have fought back fairly evenly.
It takes 72 hours before a player turns Yellow. That players growth only stopped for 24 to 48 hours. This means the attacks hit because he simply did not log in. Why? Who knows. Maybe he got in a wreck. Maybe he didn't pay his internet bill. Who knows. The point is, he was not inactive long enough for leadership to notice. However, if you take a quick check at his stats, notice that he didn't move his troops at all.
Errrrr i checked the stats and found activity, including points growth and oda rises
On the day he lost 7 villages he also gained oda, which can only be gained by an account sending troops out and attacking. plus the day before attacks began landing he gained 100k oda.
Unless you can explain another way of getting oda without logging in and attacking?
oda proves troops were moving, disproving your statement.
We have still taken more than MEA/WNA, even with them creating a third tribe. Though I will admit MEA/WNA has taken more villages in a general sense by almost 200 villages. And yet, the total point value of all those villages between us is only less than a 100,000 point difference. Barbling perhaps?
Side 1:
Tribes: 4A, JK
Side 2:
Tribes: MEA, WNA
Timeframe: Last month
Total conquers:
Side 1: 833
Side 2: 1,018
Difference: 185
Total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 29
Side 2: 15
Difference: 14
Points value of total conquers:
Side 1: 3,457,657
Side 2: 3,569,672
Difference: 112,015
Points value of total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 163,398
Side 2: 109,780
Difference: 53,618
You guys keep only posting stats against each other, but as far as we see it. These are the standings:
Side 1: Four Aces, Jokers, WALL, Wall., Wall-D, Wall 2
Side 2: MEA, WNA, AAA
Wall is losing. MEA is winning. 4A and MEA are stalemate. I don't think you guys should be happy that you have a "few" more villages than them when you guys are hitting MEA family in a 3 front war. Four Aces seem to be just getting more and more allies/NAP to prevent them from being hit, but has made no progress.
~Yes I am thumb. Great job there!~Im thinking your thumb?
~Yes I am thumb. Great job there!~
~Yes I am thumb. Great job there!~
4A is warring TR as well, great. The tribe faltering and staggering tribe barely doing anything