Past and present W28 Wars

DeletedUser70389

Guest
Meh i like russia more than U.S.A.

Russia is so big just like us the DRINK F. Russia also strikes when and only when it wants and it suits it best unlike the U.S.A who ar hungered for power go into silly wars like IRAQ to gain petrol in this case P.W.O fight E.O.N to gain villages , the U.S.A war was started due to some stupid reason as the same as the P.W.O war has , U.S.A used an excuse that their after terrorists but they really wanted the petrol, while P.W.O used the excuse of AL cid to get new villages from EoN.

Disclaimer : my time was limited and if i made some typo mistakes excuse me and i hope no one gets offended as i merely just stated my point of view and there is nothing wrong with that.

Shouldnt be any offense taken.. Me being American knows The Iraq war is stupid. I must stand by the decisions made by our leaders though. I also believe that many americans think the war is stupid
 

DeletedUser21713

Guest
wohoo i wasn't on about past and present wars in real life :icon_razz:

Can we get back on topic before everyone ends up receiving an infraction of some sort :)
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Shouldnt be any offense taken.. Me being American knows The Iraq war is stupid. I must stand by the decisions made by our leaders though. I also believe that many americans think the war is stupid

I just feel sorry for the lost soldiers that served their country who was led by a corrupt leader ( doesnt point finger at AIFOS ).

But mostly i feel sorry for the innocent people who were killed during the petrol war .
 

DeletedUser

Guest
I just feel sorry for the lost soldiers that served their country who was led by a corrupt leader ( doesnt point finger at AIFOS ).

But mostly i feel sorry for the innocent people who were killed during the petrol war .

it should have been finished the first time, however, because it wasnt, we had to go back
the evidence is there, there are no WMDs, however, we went into bosnia to stop genocide, and that was the right choice, so was this, people were being murdered, tortured, and oppressed by Sadam Hussein, while while many point to selfish motives, those are secondary compared to the people that were killed by sadam, he tested weapons on his own people... how sick is that!

now that i have said my topic i believe this thread should really get back on topic, getting totally off track

has the front list been updated?
 

DeletedUser

Guest
it should have been finished the first time, however, because it wasnt, we had to go back
the evidence is there, there are no WMDs, however, we went into bosnia to stop genocide, and that was the right choice, so was this, people were being murdered, tortured, and oppressed by Sadam Hussein, while while many point to selfish motives, those are secondary compared to the people that were killed by sadam, he tested weapons on his own people... how sick is that!

Sorry to come on here again but please don't talk about real life wars on this war game, a game is suppose to be something you can come to, to get out of real life issues

As opinions will come out...

America should mind their own businesses and look after their own country before entering other countries

Fact - more people have died in countries America have invaded!!

Opinion/Fact - All countries abuse their own

Later dude
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Sorry to come on here again but please don't talk about real life wars on this war game, a game is suppose to be something you can come to, to get out of real life issues

As opinions will come out...

America should mind their own businesses and look after their own country before entering other countries

Fact - more people have died in countries America have invaded!!

Opinion/Fact - All countries abuse their own

Later dude

your doing a bad job of stopping talk about real life wars, the fact is that more people die short term in places where america invades, but in the long run it is typically a much better situation: bosnia, korea, and a little placed called ALL OF EUROPE, so i'm sorry if you dont agree with every action that America takes, but you have to take the bad with the good

if you know something bad is happening, and have the power to stop it, but do nothing, it is agreement

you know someone is going to kill someone, and say nothing, your an accomplice, therefore, all the countries that know suffering is occurring but do not aid out of the feeling that it is not there business, i say that they are almost as bad as the ones who are doing it, i guarantee that if you were to go to the streets of iraq and ask if the people were thankful for what the americans did to 1) stop sadam and 2) bring peace between the factions and 3) stop terrorists; the majority would say they were happy to have them there, its hard to totally rebuild a countries political structure, when there is so much violence and corruption, sorry we couldn't get a quick fix for you

now then, if this conversation is to be continued i suggest someone make an off topic forum and post in there, otherwise, were all going to get infractions
 

DeletedUser

Guest
if you were to go to the streets of iraq and ask if the people were thankful for what the americans did to 1) stop sadam and 2) bring peace between the factions and 3) stop terrorists; the majority would say they were happy to have them there, its hard to totally rebuild a countries political structure, when there is so much violence and corruption, sorry we couldn't get a quick fix for you

OMG i cant believe what your telling us .

1. STOP SADAM

Sadam had nothing to do with the reason America declared war, when america declared war they sayd theyr out to avenge the september 11 attacks and to get rid of the terrorist sadam because he has nuclear weapons in his country. They never found nuclear weapons but they did find alot of petrol in iRAQ.

2. BRING PEACE BETWEEN THE FACTIONS

What factions are you talking about ?

If your referring to terrorists there will never be peace.

3. And your final point was that alot of people would say they are happy that america invaded their country , killed their family , completely destroyed their country and only made the terrorists more annoyed.

Burn Up are you from texas by any chance ?
 

DeletedUser61108

Guest
MTS F. vrs SITH f. = MTS Victory due to the involvement of PWO f.

So the newest war is now PWO f. + Sith f. vrs MTS f.

Like it or not hun, this is a new war.


Now this is funny, lets consider the points of each tribe involved, we can easily say Sith + PWO = MTS.

Then the anology would be, boxer MTS vs boxer sith/pwo (with 1 arm tied to his back, since pwo did not get involved in the beginning), after landing a few jabs on the chest of boxer SP, the judge said "untie the arm!". Now MTS starts whining, "this is unfair, we should fight boxer SP with 1 arm tied to his back since thats the only advantage we have over them. Since u untied the 2nd arm, we consider ourselves victor over a boxer with only 1 arm!"

To simplify the story , MTS can only "win" by points and size. Once the playing ground is even, Mrs "Hun" comes in and declare victory and whines.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
He's actually in the NW living og borrowed time, he's putting all the effort she can into getting PWO to not expand further north by provoking extra friction between MTS and PWO. That is something that has so far failed miserably as PWO still nobles north, as well as south.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Now this is funny, lets consider the points of each tribe involved, we can easily say Sith + PWO = MTS.

Then the anology would be, boxer MTS vs boxer sith/pwo (with 1 arm tied to his back, since pwo did not get involved in the beginning), after landing a few jabs on the chest of boxer SP, the judge said "untie the arm!". Now MTS starts whining, "this is unfair, we should fight boxer SP with 1 arm tied to his back since thats the only advantage we have over them. Since u untied the 2nd arm, we consider ourselves victor over a boxer with only 1 arm!"

To simplify the story , MTS can only "win" by points and size. Once the playing ground is even, Mrs "Hun" comes in and declare victory and whines.

MTS has yet to complain about this. Like we have stated before we knew PWO was going to join in. and Mrs. Henderson and many of these others who lose temper or flame, do not represent MTS
 

poise

Guest
Now this is funny, lets consider the points of each tribe involved, we can easily say Sith + PWO = MTS.

Then the anology would be, boxer MTS vs boxer sith/pwo (with 1 arm tied to his back, since pwo did not get involved in the beginning), after landing a few jabs on the chest of boxer SP, the judge said "untie the arm!". Now MTS starts whining, "this is unfair, we should fight boxer SP with 1 arm tied to his back since thats the only advantage we have over them. Since u untied the 2nd arm, we consider ourselves victor over a boxer with only 1 arm!"

To simplify the story , MTS can only "win" by points and size. Once the playing ground is even, Mrs "Hun" comes in and declare victory and whines.

As posted above, i have not seen one member of MTS whinging about this. In fact we welcome the challenge. With this being such an even fight point wise, not tribe can come up with excuses if they lose :)
 

DeletedUser70389

Guest
all i have heard from any of the members of MTS are praises that PWO joined. i think we were getting bored with small wars in this world, hence SITH/MTS war. when PWO declared it made a lot of people happy.
The only people that are complaining are members who are not even apart of the MTS family
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Aye, as I said earlier; Mr. Henderson probably just wants to create more friction between MTS and PWO to prolong her own time in this world, beats me why though...
 

Scorpion Khanh

Guest
OMG i cant believe what your telling us .

1. STOP SADAM

Sadam had nothing to do with the reason America declared war, when america declared war they sayd theyr out to avenge the september 11 attacks and to get rid of the terrorist sadam because he has nuclear weapons in his country. They never found nuclear weapons but they did find alot of petrol in iRAQ.

the excuse was about biological weapon I think, not the nuclear weapon
 

DeletedUser

Guest
I love how MTS think they won the war cause PWO joined the war :lol:

2 things, mts didnt even take 1 village from any of the top players of Sith! + i dont think using 20 nukes makes you smart :lol:

but if you think you guys win, its about who is the last standing. And that will be Sith and PWO, enjoy :)
 

poise

Guest
I love how MTS think they won the war cause PWO joined the war :lol:

2 things, mts didnt even take 1 village from any of the top players of Sith! + i dont think using 20 nukes makes you smart :lol:

but if you think you guys win, its about who is the last standing. And that will be Sith and PWO, enjoy :)

Crazychamps - where has MTS said we have won? We are just happy to really test ourselves. Win/Lose or draw you will not see any of our guys moaning, we are just very upbeat to face two top tribes in Sith & PWO.

MTS has had a good start and although we lost quite a few nukes on the villages taken, these will be rebuilt quite soon. It is up to Sith to launch a major op before this time, otherwise we will be back up to 100% on our nuke count :icon_twisted:
 

Scorpion Khanh

Guest
btw, MTS won the '1st one in TW to declare war on SITH' award :icon_cool:
 
Top