Pnp

[DeletedUser]

The losing points of members not the conquers :d and the under is gaining more vills than you guys no damage to them while you guys lose members slowly

 

[DeletedUser]

I agree with AoA. In many cases, stats are irrelevent. They mean absolutely nothing. The path to victory is in hammering opposing members and getting them to quit. With these settings and the sides arrayed as they presently are, I should think that Under are the overwhelming favorites to win it. They prolly wont even need to put effort into it, which is also ofc why they're sure to win.

 

[DeletedUser]

We will see!!!

 

[DeletedUser]

I agree with AoA. In many cases, stats are irrelevent. They mean absolutely nothing. The path to victory is in hammering opposing members and getting them to quit. With these settings and the sides arrayed as they presently are, I should think that Under are the overwhelming favorites to win it. They prolly wont even need to put effort into it, which is also ofc why they're sure to win.

Totally disagree with all points, but especially about UNDER not even having to put any effort into it. Here speaks someone who doesn't know the reality of the war and what's actually going on with the accts involved in it. I'm sure it seems that way from an outsider's point of view, but if you're not actually fighting in the war, there's no way to know the reality of what's actually going on.

 

[DeletedUser]

I was basing my comments on AOA's statement that INC has 11 players. No tribe is going to win a world war with 11 players is what I know. Maybe if every player was an utter unrelenting beast. But those are quite hard to come by.

 

[D4alicious]

You honestly think that 6 of me and 6 of you couldn't take on the whole of UNDER. (I rounded up to make it even)

I'm pretty sure we would do it with ease.

 

[DeletedUser]

we'll see we'll see ...

 

[DeletedUser]

Oh I don't know about that. Can you imagine if WoundedWand was a part of Inc now? Or heck, if any three active members of Under were in Inc? Like Lambezz or T-Bone, or leatherballs? With 11 members we're proving to be a very difficult bunch to annoy. So don't assume our small numbers count us out of the eventual win. With this game, just about anything can happen don't you think?

 

[DeletedUser]

Ohh for sure inc have lots of skills. If WW, or me leather etc started more up north. This world would be way differnt. But you know we all have loyalties now and it is pretty much noble everything you see. No more recruiting left

 

[DeletedUser]

Oh I don't know about that. Can you imagine if WoundedWand was a part of Inc now? Or heck, if any three active members of Under were in Inc? Like Lambezz or T-Bone, or leatherballs? With 11 members we're proving to be a very difficult bunch to annoy. So don't assume our small numbers count us out of the eventual win. With this game, just about anything can happen don't you think?

Your right but they are in under so sadly your wish will not come true

 

[DeletedUser]

My Loyalty can be Bought lol


joke lol

 

[DeletedUser]

You honestly think that 6 of me and 6 of you couldn't take on the whole of UNDER. (I rounded up to make it even)

I'm pretty sure we would do it with ease.

Thing is, there's just one of you. The other 10 players may all be very good. But, having a bunch of players sharing sits just takes the pressure off you. Unfortunate things like dog eating the modem, and breaking ur clicking finger tend to happen less and less. And when there's just 11, even 1 or 2 less ppl might b critical.

I think the smart thing to do is to try and recruit some fresh blood from other worlds, even if only as coplayers. There are a bunch of ppl who'll join a world if it's in the closing stages. You have a good story going as David against Goliath. Use it, I say.
Hell, get Jay to come back. I wouldn't bet on Under if there were 2 such players in INC. But as it is, I'll go with Under for now.

 

[D4alicious]

I'm not sure you understand what I was saying.

You said that 11 people couldn't beat UNDER. I replied saying if there were 6 players EXACTLY like me and 6 players EXACTLY like you, then we would beat them easily. Hence there would be no mysterious quitting. Mind you might get your account(s) mysteriously banned though as a way of quitting..... OHHHH... Yes I went THERE! (I'm kidding, I <3 you)

 

[DeletedUser]

Dude if there was 6 players of you and 6 players of WW, with the exact skills. I am not sure anyone would beat you. That is alot of skills. We can barley noble villages from accounts you and -Attila- sit. It just takes alot of pressure to get villages!

 

[DeletedUser]

We can barley noble villages from accounts you and -Attila- sit. It just takes alot of pressure to get villages!

thanks for the reality check, lambezz

yet some seem to think that UNDER will win with very little effort...

well, i'm sure that we will do our best to make certain that it will cost you quite a bit of effort to get villages off of us

 

[DeletedUser]

@D4. U dastard. U make a good hypothetical point. But hypothetical points are like Johnboy's dresses. He mite think they look good, but really, they just dont fit. Sure, there are 11 ppl out there who could do it, strewn across the worlds. Hell, u 11 mite do it urselves. It's just hard to do it long term at this scale.

Ofc, I'm assuming that Under don't suffer from internal discord, that their major front line players won't suddenly quit or fold, that their interior players are willing to relocate, or at least be moderately active, that they are competently organized, etc.

(EDIT) LOL. Getting banned was my best trick. It cured me of my gaming problem. Morthy offered me the choice of playing on with half my villages, but I had invested so much, planned and babied my vills for so long (lol) that I sort of lost interest. And even when I played other worlds after that, I didn't get sucked in like b4.(EDIT)

@Lambezz I think we are srsly overestimating my prowess. I used to be pretty awesome at one time, especially my defence. But I don't really have the tenacity to hunker down and play hardcore for long stretches anymore.

Compare this to what D4 has accomplished, playing at a high level for so long. That is really impressive.

 

[D4alicious]

Thanks for your kind words WW <3

 

[DeletedUser]

Inc vs UNDER - last week

Side 1:
Tribes: Inc
Side 2:
Tribes: UNDER

Timeframe: Last week

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 120
Side 2: 27
Difference: 93

Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 1,161,022
Side 2: 258,672
Difference: 902,350

Inc/Rawrr vs UNDER/OVER - Last Week

Side 1:
Tribes: Inc, RAWRR
Side 2:
Tribes: UNDER, OVER

Timeframe: Last week

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 184
Side 2: 159
Difference: 25

Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 1,777,204
Side 2: 1,554,458
Difference: 222,746

RAWKOR vs. UNDER/OVER - Last Week

Side 1:
Tribes: RAWKOR
Side 2:
Tribes: UNDER, OVER

Timeframe: Last week

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 49
Side 2: 129
Difference: 80

Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 458,506
Side 2: 1,125,403
Difference: 666,897

Aaaand Finally...

Inc vs UNDER - Since Oct 1.

Side 1:
Tribes: Inc
Side 2:
Tribes: UNDER

Timeframe: 01/10/2011 00:00:00 to 14/11/2011 23:00:13

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 1,622
Side 2: 882
Difference: 740

Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 15,500,189
Side 2: 8,420,486
Difference: 7,079,703

 

[DeletedUser]

Lol i did that in the other thread

You should spoiler tho

Edit: Your stats are better then mine. lol and they are not bias. Good job

 

[DeletedUser]

Yeah, forgot to spoiler, my bad

But thanks Lamby!