Rabbid V's X.

DeletedUser98419

Guest
As for lets keep this not personal whos the one talking about my mum low life :D

why have you blocked me everywhere you not like being stood upto and called out on with your lies.
 

Wile E. Coyote

Guest
JC quit long before any of this even took place liar

What? JC quit before X took your villages as trade? Are you serious??? No he didn't. He orchestrated the whole deal. You had just ate 2noob1Cup...then lost several to X in order to have diplomacy sorted out. You really are a fool...
 

hurod

Guest
So this thread is Shag against X now? As Rabid member i feel left aside :(
I see so much hate against Shag but still he is here and in top 10. From what i read i can only say that barking dogs wont bite...


As for X i have to say we finally had someone to fight against. Let the best tribe win.
 

DeletedUser98419

Guest
So this thread is Shag against X now? As Rabid member i feel left aside :(
I see so much hate against Shag but still he is here and in top 10. From what i read i can only say that barking dogs wont bite...


As for X i have to say we finally had someone to fight against. Let the best tribe win.

If we are barking dogs what does that make geo and the rest of the loud mouths over there? all the ones talking trash from your side but no results from them.

Only reason your left out of the mix is because you dont do anything :p Do something and people may talk about you too.

Let the war continue :D

But good luck I guess...
 

Garrock

Guest
Years ago I spent a fair amount of time in the jungle of Panama training. They have these monkeys there, and these monkeys love throwing shite all over the place, and worse than that, they like to eat it as well.

Most of the above has led me to reminisce a bit. Thank-you (bow).

You can slice this any way you wish, but Rabid attacking X. has absolutely nothing to do with Shagan, nor Panda. This was the natural progression of the world. We've beaten the invitations of Panda members to death already, and, despite not owing anyone an explanation I gave it, and stand by it.

The statistics mean absolutely nothing... I could easily toss in 5-6 tribes on the side of X. and say "looky here, we've been crushing you all world long in one form or another", but then again that wouldn't be a true reflection of much now would it?

Axes were not that fantastic.... Drama pretty damn good. W14 and W47 Uruz pretty damn good (@ grammar) w35 G.Khan, w44 Br0ken all pretty good in their own right... Listing tribes I've personally been affiliated with of course. Random was pretty fantastic etc... I think anyone who has been around more than a couple of years would admit that the talent pool is just not here anymore to build any kind of truly epic tribes, this makes it all relative. It's sad, but we are in the twilight of the TW years, ok, maybe it's not that sad, maybe we can all just get on with our lives.

@ skux,
mate, you take the one persons comment here who actually made a somewhat non-combative statement and attacked him. The shite throwing here has been tossed from multiple directions, so it's fine, but as an fyi, that high horse you're riding has been rolling around in that shite, you're just another random nameless flamer along with the rest.

/cheers

and good luck to you mates...

-Gar
 

Stewinthepot

blocked
Reaction score
127
@ skux,
mate, you take the one persons comment here who actually made a somewhat non-combative statement and attacked him. The shite throwing here has been tossed from multiple directions, so it's fine, but as an fyi, that high horse you're riding has been rolling around in that shite, you're just another random nameless flamer along with the rest.

/cheers

and good luck to you mates...

-Gar

An entire post written to be quite condescending and you cap it off with saying that someone is riding a high horse on here. :lol: There's hardly room for anyone else on this forum with your ego in here, though it is quite entertaining.


You know it says your name right next to the post right? Kinda redundant to sign it at the bottom

-Stew
 

SHAGAN888

Guest
Love how you hide behind the unknown names in here and expect retaliation.....Grow a pair why dont ya.....
 

DeletedUser

Guest
shhh....we just seen inside your undies bro...you got nuthin'
and i claim nothing..:icon_rolleyes:
what about URUZ,ZIPS,-ND-,Fork!.....hahahah
zip it wally... (kiss)
back on topic punk..rather than swinging nuts..lets talk rabid V's X. aye???

URUZ has never really impressed me, though did quite well.
-ND- was impressive till the noob recruiting started.
ODA W50 waz a truly great tribe from the day it was formed, till the world win at 100%

Barb on 67 was not bad either, I have seen a lot worse tribes win a world
 

SHAGAN888

Guest
What? JC quit before X took your villages as trade? Are you serious??? No he didn't. He orchestrated the whole deal. You had just ate 2noob1Cup...then lost several to X in order to have diplomacy sorted out. You really are a fool...

Nathan worked out any and all deals NOT JC you have your lies running into each other once again mate
 

DeletedUser117579

Guest
URUZ has never really impressed me, though did quite well.
-ND- was impressive till the noob recruiting started.
ODA W50 waz a truly great tribe from the day it was formed, till the world win at 100%

Barb on 67 was not bad either, I have seen a lot worse tribes win a world

I thought I knew you. William Anker - Inappropriate Content. Wasn't it?
 

Grammar Commie

Guest
Eh? Jeez, there've been some terrible posts in this thread, not least from Shag, and probably some of my own, but that's just worthless...
 

Wile E. Coyote

Guest
Nathan worked out any and all deals NOT JC you have your lies running into each other once again mate

Nathan was on JCarrier...Chetan (his co) quit ages before this even happened...lol..so JC is Nathan as far as Im concerned..then JC (Nathan) quit as well...and you got 85% of his villages.
 

DeletedUser62294

Guest
Goodness Shagan really is as daft as he seems....shouldn't expect anything less from someone hiding behind internals calling himself any good.....

As for talk about good tribes MoM on w56 probably had the most well known and solid players all combined of course it didn't last long but that lineup was scary. Its hard to judge great tribes as far too many worlds the tribes that win had no competition for one reason or another.
 

Internal Server Error

Guest
The statistics mean absolutely nothing... I could easily toss in 5-6 tribes on the side of X. and say "looky here, we've been crushing you all world long in one form or another", but then again that wouldn't be a true reflection of much now would it?

I don't really care for much that has been said in this thread. The posts/trolling are what they are and at least have given something to read. However, this quote is pretty laughable and I was disappointed to see it was posted by someone I consider to normally be pretty logical & fair in their posts.

We have had no allies for the duration of this world. To compare PANDA to some random smaller tribe you mopped up is a joke and quite a pathetic attempt at deflecting from the situation at hand. You were allied to PANDA since their inception. We were warring (and beating) them. Stats didn't reflect the domination we had in the war, which is evident by their collapse and subsequent dash to your tribe. So yes, adding them to stats is a pretty fair representation of the war. We were warring PANDA (your allies). You recruited PANDA (your allies) and then declared war on X. (the tribe PANDA ran from). The only point that I guess is debatable is how long PANDA would've survived without any Rabid intervention.

I don't really care about the fact you recruited PANDA, it is what it is. You were willing to compromise your supposed-"ideals" to attempt to breathe life into your tribe and win the world. Your choice. X. weren't willing to compromise it's ideals which is why recruitment of PANDA was never really on the cards.

The war as it stands is Rabanda vs X.. If people wish I can add SHAGAN to future stats but I have no real care or interest in arguing it either way. Rabid have done ok so far and lead the stats in their individual war stats. Time will show which way the war goes.

[spoil]Rabanda: 3,182 villages
X.: 1,731 villages

Side 1:
Tribes: X.
Side 2:
Tribes: Panda, Rabid

Timeframe: 02/06/2016 00:00:00 to 23/06/2016 06:27:59

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 92
Side 2: 76
Difference: 16

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 775,509
Side 2: 643,115
Difference: 132,394

chart

[/spoil]

Best of luck.

 
Last edited:

StopThePorn

Guest
To be honest it would be fun to see how a 1v1v1 war would have gone. However, we can all get what we want right?

About the stats, I agree that Panda has to be on the stats - and you have done well against "Rabanda". At the same time, stats with only X and Rabid the last few weeks shows the current state of the war, even though you are taking some Panda villages too. Rabid have the upper hand atm, but this could be a pretty long war - and many things can happen. Really depends on if the key accounts can keep up their activity. My account certainly will.. Good luck all!
 

Garrock

Guest
I don't really care for much that has been said in this thread. The posts/trolling are what they are and at least have given something to read. However, this quote is pretty laughable and I was disappointed to see it was posted by someone I consider to normally be pretty logical & fair in their posts.

We have had no allies for the duration of this world. To compare PANDA to some random smaller tribe you mopped up is a joke and quite a pathetic attempt at deflecting from the situation at hand. You were allied to PANDA since their inception. We were warring (and beating) them. Stats didn't reflect the domination we had in the war, which is evident by their collapse and subsequent dash to your tribe. So yes, adding them to stats is a pretty fair representation of the war. We were warring PANDA (your allies). You recruited PANDA (your allies) and then declared war on X. (the tribe PANDA ran from). The only point that I guess is debatable is how long PANDA would've survived without any Rabid intervention.

I don't really care about the fact you recruited PANDA, it is what it is. You were willing to compromise your supposed-"ideals" to attempt to breathe life into your tribe and win the world. Your choice. X. weren't willing to compromise it's ideals which is why recruitment of PANDA was never really on the cards.

The war as it stands is Rabanda vs X.. If people wish I can add SHAGAN to future stats but I have no real care or interest in arguing it either way. Rabid have done ok so far and lead the stats in their individual war stats. Time will show which way the war goes.

[spoil]Rabanda: 3,182 villages
X.: 1,731 villages

Side 1:
Tribes: X.
Side 2:
Tribes: Panda, Rabid

Timeframe: 02/06/2016 00:00:00 to 23/06/2016 06:27:59

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 92
Side 2: 76
Difference: 16

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 775,509
Side 2: 643,115
Difference: 132,394

chart

[/spoil]

Best of luck.


mmmm, when one considers the history of many members in X. would be why I made the statement... and I did go on to say that it wouldn't mean much. The point of the comment is to say that our war with X. had very little to do with shagan or Panda... it's not saying we have not benefited from them, merely that it had nothing to do with our going to war.

sorry if it wasn't clear for you ISE, and yes, good-luck.
 

Grammar Commie

Guest
We've beaten the invitations of Panda members to death already, and, despite not owing anyone an explanation I gave it, and stand by it.

Hmmm, not sure anyone was questioning it, or bemoaning it, but it happened so including Panda in the stats makes sense. And it wasn't beaten to death...it was mentioned in a previous thread, you gave some superficial disingenuous response, and no-one really cares.

The point of the comment is to say that our war with X. had very little to do with shagan or Panda...

Yeah, it was inevitable. And nothing in this thread suggested otherwise, so that seems entirely tangential...but thanks for recruiting him :)

And as for the coprophagia analogy, that seems way off the mark...Mud-slinging there may have been, but actual shite-eating? The human species may not have many redeeming features but at least we have the benefit of nutritionists and Sanatogen - other primates/mammals don't, and often have a good biological reason for something that seems so icky...
 
Last edited:
Top