Rate The Player Above You

  • Thread starter Thread starter DeletedUser113868
  • Start date Start date
Mako you know reading isnt my strong point :P

anyway

=bit cloud=

Points: 3/5 - Decent amount of points to the cap's earned. Fair bit of internals (who hasn't ;).) not many caps from ADHD war roughly 160k says stats. and then a nice big chunk of out side growth earn caps.
Area:2/5 - Im not keen on how spread the account is, its all over the southern part of the world. But that because my game play evolve round nice chunky clusters
OD: 2/5 - From the 07-06-2015 you had 18.2mil ODA up to today you have 23.2 mil ODA. so only a 5mil jump. Where as from the same date till now i have jumped 17.5 mill ODA. Im only going of ODA for this since. Stacking Frontline Villages in a war is gunna boost my overal OD.
Tribe: 3/5 Well i dont really know growth enough.
Profile: 4/5 Love the Profile Pic, and this little quote 'you have to want to win more than you want to sleep.'. and the fact you use similar boxes to mark down your co's ;)

Other: 5/5 I love the fact in the external forums 9 outta 10 times you put something Worth the read on :P yes mako you need to improve hhahha
 
Last edited:
I'll rate the account Stephen9 is on. Is it bias to rate one of my co-players? :D

Points: 5/10 - An o.k. size.
Area: 1/10 - It could be better. Sadly not many targets left after the recruitments.
OD: 5/10 - Obviously a Mannieshield.
Tribe: 9/10 - Simply because they have a Dagan. Had to subtract one point because they have Mako. :P
Profile: 3/10 - The profile picture is nice. Needs more funny comments.
Other: 1/10 - Needs to spam the externals more, like much of the T.W. community.

No need to rate my account. Instead, rate Twistedmindctrl3. (I randomly chose this account for people to rate).
 
Ok then, allow me to rate Twistedmindctrl3

Points : 1/5 - Too damn low for him, and he is there barb nobling so that is not my style of doing things haha.
Area : 3/5 - On the rim, got way to expand through Growth north or east. Can even go after Crunch.
OD : 3/5 - Not bad, 2/5 for ODA and 4/5 for ODD. He did get hit and used a few of his nukes. Pretty neat if you ask me.
Tribe : 2/5 - THEY DID PUT UP MORE OF A FIGHT THAN LOYAL, anyway, not a tribe that someone can consider top tribe.
Profile : 1/5 - Not that they got something over there anyway.
Other : 3/5 - He need to work on his external profile, a lot, but he is a cool and reasonable guys.

Go ahead rate this account haha :D

-Olt. TableForOne
 
"They put up more fight than loyal"

Lol cute statement. Wonder how the war would have turned out had it been loyal vs growth from the start
 
TableForOne

Points: 2.5/5 - They're o.k. I guess? Not sure exactly what to say about the points. Maybe a breakdown of caps? 207 internals and 76 barbs nobled. (283 of 594 villages). 51 villages nobled from Loyal, 11 lost (Net +40 villages). View those stats how you wish.
Area: 3/5 - [SPOIL]
en74
[/SPOIL]Mostly backline, could be a fun account if it's offensive. The account is spread out over the south, so there could be some longer travel times.

OD: 4/5 - The account's ODA is higher than its points rank, so that's good. ODD simply means the account hasn't really been hit much.
Tribe: 4/5 - I've enjoyed watching Growth throughout the world.
Profile: 1/5 - The best thing about the profile is the profile picture. Needs funny quotes, something entertaining.
Other: 0/5 - Obviously doesn't reply on the externals much. Only 96 visits to the player's profile. No, "About Me" information, obviously not personalized.


oldmannie
 
Last edited:
I was going to pick this moment to rate you george, but I can't seem to figure out what account you're on.
 
asderf200 said:
I was going to pick this moment to rate you george, but I can't seem to figure out what account you're on.
Click to expand...
Yeah, when I had posted, I had forgotten to state which account I"m on. I've edited my post to add my account name.

Apparently Stephen9 actually wanted our account rated. I didn't know initially, and that's why I had Twistedmindctrl3 rated instead.
 
Angels Fury said:
Probably the same :icon_eek:
Click to expand...

Maybe, maybe not, its all hypothetical, but even if it does go the same way(big if) I don't think you can claim that we did not put up a fight.

I don't think I have to reiterate whatever was said in other threads, you know fully well what you guys did, and fully well whether that statement really applies
 
aquilon said:
"They put up more fight than loyal"

Lol cute statement. Wonder how the war would have turned out had it been loyal vs growth from the start
Click to expand...

Well, last time it was Growth vs Loyal ( Soon ) since the start the caps were 252 - 18 for us..

What have changed so much since then? I'll tell you, we were 234 caps ahead in 45 days.. this time we were 701 caps ahead in 9 days.

You can still keep saying it was unexpected, that your backline was empty ( It wasn't actually, it just was not stacked. )

The winner doesn't need excuses, the loser shouldn't be there to make excuses.

Annnddd I'm out.

-Olt.
 
You forget to mention both times you jumped us while we were warring on another front

Growth has never had a straight fight with soon/loyal lets face it. Winning of course you were winning, but when you have not faced us in a fair fight you should not be too hasty to claim to we would not have put up a fight.

Fairly sure if that we did the jumping both times while you warred somewhere elsethe results would have been the same on our part, with you losing a lot of villages. Lol.

Now, if you won us in a straight fight i would have no "excuses" to offer. Have you seen me blowing my top off at nme after they won? Until you have done so, I will continue slamming Growth as long as you insist on belittling loyal/soon on account of your "glorious" and "mighty" accomplishments
 
Last edited:
If you guys wish to discuss the whole Growth/Loyal matter, please do it in another thread.


My account needs rated: oldmannie
*Waits for asderf's review. :)
 
Points : 3.5/5 - Above average for the pack (IMO). Could be better given all those cos
Area : 3/5 - Going to slightly generous here, as your account could end up landlocked and away from Ex loyal. Large cluster should make it easy to jump around.
OD : 4/5 - Very nice ODA and one heck of a ODD boost. Gee, wonder if your profile pic should explain anything /end sarcasm
Tribe : 5/5 - I'll give a 5 here because they're rank 1 and have been since I joined 74. I don't know much about them other than old wives tales, so I'll keep my trap shut
Profile : 3/5 - Not much there tbf. +1 for the nice pun, -1 for probably lying about "Cool guy"

Kim Jong un
 
asderf200 said:
Kim Jong un [/COLOR]
Click to expand...

Points : 4/5 - Nice rank, good size.
Area : 3/5 - Good spread, east and west. Huge safezone in Growths mainland, could make it a fun account but also travel times I guess can be tough.
OD : 1.5/5 - Maybe I am being too hard here, low ODD and decent ODA but not in line with a player of such a size. It seems you havent had much resistance and thats not necessarily a bad thing in this game sometimes :icon_idea:
Tribe : 4.5/5 - I have liked Growth since its very early days.
Profile : 4/5 - Witty and troll to match the name :icon_biggrin:
 
asderf200 said:
Points : 3.5/5 - Above average for the pack (IMO). Could be better given all those cos
Area : 3/5 - Going to slightly generous here, as your account could end up landlocked and away from Ex loyal. Large cluster should make it easy to jump around.
Before we took in Loyal players, we had a nice frontline. :(
OD : 4/5 - Very nice ODA and one heck of a ODD boost. Gee, wonder if your profile pic should explain anything /end sarcasm
Thanks, I made that. :)
Tribe : 5/5 - I'll give a 5 here because they're rank 1 and have been since I joined 74. I don't know much about them other than old wives tales, so I'll keep my trap shut
Profile : 3/5 - Not much there tbf. +1 for the nice pun, -1 for probably lying about "Cool guy"
The "Cool Guy" listing wasn't my idea. lol. I was a secret co-player for 3 months, so that's what I was listed as.
Click to expand...
^My replies are in blue.

Now to rate SOLO:

Points: 4/5 - You get the other point if you can pass Tiger. :P
Area: 5/5 - Looks like it could be a lot of fun.
OD: 5/5 - High ranks in both ODA and ODD, obviously fought other players a fair bit.
Tribe: 5/5 - Top tribe in points. Leads the ODA rankings by a lot (50% higher than the rank #2 tribe in the ODA rankings).
Profile: 2/5 - The wall of text in the personal text section is an eye sore. I gave 2 points for the account's profile because he has it listed that he's on Tatooine. The points were also partially given for the profile picture (gif).

Since I've recently been rated, rate: Tuzain
 
Last edited:
turzain

Points: 4/5 - ranked 35 being a duke consumes time so not a bad rank
Area: 5/5 - Looks pretty solid not a lot of outsiders in there core.
OD: 5/5 - attacker of the day a few times leads his tribe into battle not bad. defender of the day shows he has taken a punch too.
Tribe: 4/5 - would have been a 5 except for taking mystery nuke that's a one point penalty
Profile: 3/5 - attempt at humor his warning is vague picture rather boring


over all a creditable threat to any one in the world
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top