Rate The Player Thread

[DeletedUser]

In a (what is possibly pointless) attempt to liven the board up a little..

Rate the player above you. I imagine the same players will come up over and over again, but it may give a little bit of life for a few days :icon_surprised:

Mark out of 10.... 1 being dire and 10 being immense + reason for your rating. :icon_twisted:

 

[DeletedUser]

id say 7 which is pretty average. sure compared to me your probably amazing at the game.
I didnt give 10 due to the fact that for every month of the year so far youve been in more that once alliance, jumping from one to the other. That may not be your fault as some do not exist anymore but some of them seems to be dropping points extremely fast. So either you were running away from fights, the tribes were going inactive or theres alot of merging going on.

 

[DeletedUser]

1, not trying to be mean or anything, your ODA is less than what i have been averaging daily, you havn't taken a village yet and your join date was before i joined world 45.

 

[DeletedUser]

6

Haven't seen your gameplay, so I had to go solely on what TWstats would tell me.

Points are good, ODA is fairly impressive. I also loved your in-game avatar

The parts that brought you down is that a great number of your conquers are inactives/barbarians. Those taken from players outside of your tribe are rather less than ideal. Eleven instances where you have overnobled yourself also suggests careless planning rather than unfortunate accidents.

 

[DeletedUser86073]

One word = CATS = No respect, Medion1234 your a fecking idiot man.

 

[DeletedUser]

6

Haven't seen your gameplay, so I had to go solely on what TWstats would tell me.

Points are good, ODA is fairly impressive. I also loved your in-game avatar

The parts that brought you down is that a great number of your conquers are inactives/barbarians. Those taken from players outside of your tribe are rather less than ideal. Eleven instances where you have overnobled yourself also suggests careless planning rather than unfortunate accidents.

i see where you are coming from but a lot of my conquers are from 24 hours away or more so i normally always send 5 nobles nothing ticks me off more than sending out 4 nobles and leaving the village at two loyalty , and with the noble cost of this world plus.
Number of noblemen that can be educated
-Number of academies: 135
- Existing noblemen 36
- Noblemen in education: 0
- Number of conquered villages: 64
You can still educate: 35

i can care less if i lose a noble here or there

 

[DeletedUser88837]

Never spoke to you btard. sorry bud. Going strictly by twstats, your not doing bad.

 

[DeletedUser]

6
Eleven instances where you have overnobled yourself also suggests careless planning rather than unfortunate accidents.

This = Foolish
I'm sure most people have overnobled at MINIMUM 11 times. As was stated before nobles are so cheap on this world and it is so annoying not taking the village with 4 nobles I consider it to be careless planning NOT to use 5 nobles which in turn leads to the overnobling more times than not.


As for the topic hmmm... Xenthyl. I'll say 8 just based on stats, nearly in the top 20 so you gotta be doing somthing right. You do however have a number of conquers against the UFC tribes and i'm sorry i just can't give you credit for that

 

[DeletedUser]

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

8 or a 9 nice rank good od decent positioning in the world nice

 

[DeletedUser]

looks ok considering late start, maybe a little slow on the startup but then maybe im just being too critical. ODA looks good consider earl stages, though maybe a little higher than i might have expected/wanted for being out on the rim

6/10

 

[DeletedUser]

10/10 your oda is incredible matched with your overall od...
Edit: good positioning, good tribe. Nothing more to say

 

[DeletedUser]

In response to the negative feedback that I've received regarding my post about btard's overnobling, I'm not saying that using 5 nobles is bad, especially on a single packet world. However, it is quite easy to decrease the number of troops in the escort of each progressive attack so that if you take the village with the 4th noble, it has enough troops to kill those in the fifth attack, preventing the overnoble. That's what I was talking about when I suggested a bit of laziness.

On a world such as this with single packet nobles, it doesn't matter in practice if you overnoble, but it does reflect upon your personal gameplay. I would honestly bet that I wasn't the only one to notice this (and not just you btard, but it goes the same for others)

Adzdev, I'm glad I don't have your respect. I fear that if I had the respect from one who conducts themselves as disgracefully as you do on the forums, then I would be disliked by everyone else.

 

[DeletedUser]

Not that this is a topic to waste time arguing about but say you put 20LC with your 4th and 5th nobles... the 20LC will wipe out those 20LC from the fourth attack and you will only lose about 3 of the 20 escorting the 5th noble.

I think its safe to say nobody will be even slightly hurt from losing 23LC combined to make sure you take the village. :icon_biggrin:

 

[DeletedUser]

In response to the negative feedback that I've received regarding my post about btard's overnobling, I'm not saying that using 5 nobles is bad, especially on a single packet world. However, it is quite easy to decrease the number of troops in the escort of each progressive attack so that if you take the village with the 4th noble, it has enough troops to kill those in the fifth attack, preventing the overnoble. That's what I was talking about when I suggested a bit of laziness.

One could simply argue that doing this is a waste of offensive power:icon_idea: Its such an insignificant area though. I could argue that everyone should send scouts and farm the most effective way possible at this point in the game still. But that wont make you a better player probably just burn you out faster. I have farmed once this week, sure that is laziness, but I would love for you or anyone to test how that speaks towards my abilities The two are unrelated. I doubt formz or simz have enough offense to keep any villages if they attacked me.

 

[DeletedUser]

Rate the player . 9/10
Seen matt play inactively and hit top 20 on a competitive world. Seems to be doing alright with R4Ki :icon_rolleyes:

The two are unrelated. I doubt formz or simz have enough offense to keep any villages if they attacked me.

sounds like a challenge .... :icon_rolleyes:

 

[Muldie325]

As has been argued on world 49, it is actually more efficient in terms of resources to have the chance of overnobling yourself than to guarantee the death of the following nobles due to the constant pricing.

 

[DeletedUser88837]

Fixed the oda issue. As for muldie...I'd have to give him 1/10 based simply on the profile pic he chose. <3 chew anyhow bud!

 

[DeletedUser]

In response to the negative feedback that I've received regarding my post about btard's overnobling, I'm not saying that using 5 nobles is bad, especially on a single packet world. However, it is quite easy to decrease the number of troops in the escort of each progressive attack so that if you take the village with the 4th noble, it has enough troops to kill those in the fifth attack, preventing the overnoble. That's what I was talking about when I suggested a bit of laziness.

On a world such as this with single packet nobles, it doesn't matter in practice if you overnoble, but it does reflect upon your personal gameplay. I would honestly bet that I wasn't the only one to notice this (and not just you btard, but it goes the same for others)

disagree. The most important/costly thing on this world is not nobles/packets like most other worlds, but instead troop conservation. Unless you are training D in your O villas to send with the 4th noble to prevent overnobling then frankly id be quite happy to overnoble evertime rather than kill off troops. While it may not be a lot, you are taking troops away from you main nuke, thus increasing your losses not onl from the initial clearing but also those you are killling with 5th noble. Or if ou train D you are obviousl decreasing overall nuke size to have that D in there in the first place. There are other knock on effects which i could get into but i think ou get my point.

Adzdev, I'm glad I don't have your respect. I fear that if I had the respect from one who conducts themselves as disgracefully as you do on the forums, then I would be disliked by everyone else.

Agreed.:icon_biggrin:

EDIT:

I doubt formz or simz have enough offense to keep any villages if they attacked me.

that does sound like a challenge =P

ou had better be sitting a boat loada D or methinks i might be a little insulted

 

[DeletedUser88837]

Um... Hedge... yeahhhhhh...

 

[DeletedUser]

Xenthyl


What he doesn't know about this game probably isn't worth knowing.

Fetish for scripts and wild goats.

Solid player, good ODA, Great position, all round good guy.

I want to hug him with a loving squeeze

I'll get my coat

9.99 /10