DeletedUser
Guest
I could ask one of my kids to explain it if you're struggling?
Kids...lmfaoo suggesting that your tribe are full of little inexperienced players. Well done!
I could ask one of my kids to explain it if you're struggling?
Kids...lmfaoo suggesting that your tribe are full of little inexperienced players. Well done!
He is a father of two..
That must be a new word you've learnt, well done.
The most aggressive tribe on W48 is....
1. CRASH (not on a tribal scale, but on player scale)
2.Womble (If you can call sending 20 nukes in front of a nobletrain aggressive?)
3. Piranha(They talk the talk! But cannot walk the walk!)
1. there are more then 3 tribes...
2. It asked most aggressive tribe, you said CRASH not on a tribal scale??
3. -XIII- and ACSN aren't more agressive then Piranha??
Exactly your personal opinion. The fact that players noble and message womble and the instant we attack they quit and we get the we can only noble inactives. Crash have a bucket load of inactives then. When we do focus on players we seem to win then get the they were on holiday excuse lol
Now let's put the shoe on the other foot. Have crash got winning stats on an active player yet. Hmmm nope I don't think so.
Thats sarcasm Bama, after walshaw being one of the main sitters of that account after Wachen quit.
You can cover for him all you want, but there was no hint of sarcasm in that post. 1st was apparently under the impression that was actually walsh's account from where I'm sitting. Also, Crash can't be the most aggressive tribe in the world when they claimed they could take on the entire world, then NAP Pirahna because they can't handle a tribe "half their size". Womble has never nap'd a tribe during a war and probably never will.
Our diplomacy is our business, yours is yours. It's not for you to tell me why we NAP'd or allied certain tribes.