SETO vs. DNS war

DeletedUser

Guest
Ali Red Fist said:
not being on the border of SETO never stopped you from attacking out inactives
thought you could get a good station in our territory??

wasnt that easy was it?

its DNS strategy to always hit the inactives, i'm yet to see DNS attack a active person
even when they are attacking inactives, as soon as th guy becomes active again, and starts defending and snipping nobles, and taking back villages
all attacks stop on him, coincidence??
Click to expand...


you didnt answer my question, did u?
I forgot mbex also.. IF i would count them they would be 20s

and do you know more then me if i attacked or NOT? :icon_surprised:

and btw. you points are more then your OD A.

tell me the players that we did rim and were inactive
P.S: dont take it personal, it is already a game
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Side 1: ~DNS~ DNS DNSa NUTS

Side 2: INVITE Invice INV-U [IB] [IB]78 [IB]87 [IB]UC

Timeframe: Last 48 hours

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 15
Side 2: 18
Difference: 3

image.php


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 125,842
Side 2: 187,428
Difference: 61,586

image.php


Side 1: ~DNS~ DNS DNSa NUTS

Side 2: INVITE Invice INV-U [IB] [IB]78 [IB]87 [IB]UC

Timeframe: Last week

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 67
Side 2: 92
Difference: 25

image.php


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 609,001
Side 2: 895,225
Difference: 286,224

image.php
 

Mouse220

Guest
Ali Red Fist said:
you jusy prooved my point
Click to expand...

I did? A person who has a high rank in [IB] is inactive? He was asking for support the whole time, and he got it, but we still took his villages.

We only kicked him out of K67 and K68,which was our goal while making the co-op.
 
Last edited:

picadilypie

Guest
Mouse220 said:
I did? The leader of [IB] (I think) is inactive? He was asking for support the whole time, and he got it, but we still took his villages.

We only kicked him out of K67 and K68,which was our goal while making the co-op.
Click to expand...

nah i don't think GAP is a leader just a highly active baron or council member, although he's not so active anymore scince we hit him :)
 

DeletedUser

Guest
mrdragonman said:
another time TRYING to lie. :icon_rolleyes:
btw. how many active players have you rimmed?:icon_neutral:
Click to expand...

You know it is kind of hard to tell if you rimmed an active player or not, because by the time someone has one village, they usually go inactive. Either way both tribes always want the easy way out, so both would always want to go for inactives people first.

However, I did notice a trend that when a person is getting overwhelmed, unless they are very desperate or stubborn, they usually give up. I am sure that there have been good exceptions, but I think thats just how it looks in a trend.
 

Mouse220

Guest
think2know80 said:
However, I did notice a trend that when a person is getting overwhelmed, unless they are very desperate or stubborn, they usually give up.
Click to expand...

I didn't. I went from 950K to 650K points in about a week, but I'm still here.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Mouse220 said:
I didn't. I went from 950K to 650K points in about a week, but I'm still here.
Click to expand...

think2know80 said:
You know it is kind of hard to tell if you rimmed an active player or not, because by the time someone has one village, they usually go inactive. Either way both tribes always want the easy way out, so both would always want to go for inactives people first.

However, I did notice a trend that when a person is getting overwhelmed, unless they are very desperate or stubborn, they usually give up. I am sure that there have been good exceptions, but I think thats just how it looks in a trend.
Click to expand...

Read all of the text. Plus, I am sure a lot of people don't want to retake all of that time nobling back and growing and rebuilding again, thus they quit.:icon_sad:
 

Mouse220

Guest
Side 1: DNS DNSa ~DNS~

Side 2: [IB] [IB]78 [IB]87 [IB]s [IB]UC

Timeframe: Last week

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 53
Side 2: 32
Difference: 21

image.php


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 489,790
Side 2: 275,366
Difference: 214,424

image.php


Side 1: DNS DNSa ~DNS~

Side 2: INVITE Invice INV-U

Timeframe: Last week

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 23
Side 2: 44
Difference: 21

image.php


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 227,206
Side 2: 448,592
Difference: 221,386

image.php




Side 1: DNS DNSa ~DNS~

Side 2: [IB] [IB]78 [IB]87 [IB]s [IB]UC INVITE Invice INV-U

Timeframe: Last week

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 76
Side 2: 76
Difference: 0

image.php


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 716,996
Side 2: 723,958
Difference: 6,962

image.php
 
Last edited:

DeletedUser

Guest
Mouse220 said:
Side 1: DNS DNSa ~DNS~

Side 2: [IB] [IB]78 [IB]87 [IB]s [IB]UC INVITE Invice INV-U

Timeframe: Last week

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 76
Side 2: 76
Difference: 0

image.php


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 716,996
Side 2: 723,958
Difference: 6,962

image.php
Click to expand...

oh please tell me this is fake =P you guys nobled the same amount from each other? why not just keep the old villages lol
 

sexynasherboy

Guest
Janin said:
oh please tell me this is fake =P you guys nobled the same amount from each other? why not just keep the old villages lol
Click to expand...


for DNS is asking member from SETO im guess F-U-N if they want to go DNS
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top