SH, SH2 vs sco, sco2

shadowcrei

Guest
This is to make an official thread


The tribe is now at war with SlaughterHouse!

War name: Remove The Barb Munchers

Declaration:
Bye Bye Barb Munchers,

you where warned more then once.

Your Council member Sangsters Gangsters Said and we quote "SCO - Sangsters Gangsters today at 02:16 Thanks Quote Edit Delete
ok you ppl dont know me and i will tell you now, you dont tell my members what they can noble and what they cant, it is is called growth you dont like it... get you big girl panties on and deal with it, Drew will not be demoted, and the village is his, you dont like it..! tough shit, you have a issues, mail me... simple"



SO Mail Him and complain about the attacks and lost villages now...


Good Bye !
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

There are always multiple sides to a "story", so SCO wishes to address the lies used to coerce other tribes into a war. First, I must say, "Watch your back ED! That 'unbreakable' NAP you have with ~SH~ is as breakable as the shifting wind in their eyes." Second, I KNOW I have not BB-coded and linked everything within this narrative. My apologies, but when you work and have a RL outside of TW, attempting to post during your "working hours" means you either play TW or lose your job (I choose my job, so I posted this quickly).

SCO was originally approached by wakeling about establishing diplomacy and joining an alliance between ~SH~, ~SH2~, and SH-IT to take out ED! Needless to say, ~SH~ cannot even adhere to its own agreement. Between the time the agreement was enforced on 4/7/19 and ending on 4/14/19, and the nobling of barbs discussed extensively, ~SH~ and ~SH2~ took FOUR barbarian villages compared to the one barbarian village that one SCO member took, and that was ONLY after the barbarian village had been posted in the forum, the strategic location of the barb explained, etc. grim reaper with ~SH~ felt it fair game to cheat the noble planner during this period and yet had the nerve to dictate to SCO about “dismissing” a council member over the nobling of the barbarian. We we presented evidence over the noble planner cheat, ~SH~ wouldn't even think of punishing grim reaper. Funny how the truth behind the matter is always quite different and cheats and cowards have to resort to lies to play a game.

BARBS NOBLED BY ~SH~/~SH2~ BETWEEN 4/6/19 - 4/14/19 (period during which diplomacy was in effect):

[03] Goan (537|454) K45 681 Barbarian Smee [~SH~] 2019-04-13 18:47:31
Shes got the Jack (528|485) K451,579 Barbarian Wasted Rock Ranger [~SH~] 2019-04-13 13:50:13
004 (499|480) K44 1,477 Barbarian Killer willard [~SH~] 2019-04-12 04:37:08
002 Allfadern (530|499) K45 1,835 Barbarian Brokenfear [~SH~] 2019-04-06 17:12:17
002 St. Stephen (527|499) K45 162 Barbarian UnKnownThreat [~SH~] 2019-04-06 10:04:02
002 (508|480) K45 106 Barbarian Killer willard [~SH~] 2019-04-03 19:54:05
002 Pandora (511|455) K45 190 Barbarian Divining [~SH2~] 2019-04-11 23:01:59

BARBS NOBLED BY SCO/SCOX2 BETWEEN 4/6/19 - 4/14/19 (period during which diplomacy was in effect):

These two were nobled AFTER we issued the order to all players to noble every barb around ~SH~ when they broke the treaty:
Bonus village (567|451) K45 203 Barbarian sweetfairy [SCO] 2019-04-14 13:13:41
002 (578|479) K45 754 Barbarian hzrd [SCO] 2019-04-14 11:39:47

And this is the ONE barbarian to the SEVEN that ~SH~/~SH2~ took over which ~SH~ had its meltdown:
004 Claires Lair (519|488) K45 87 Barbarian drewtolo [SCO] 2019-04-13 07:03:07
 

EasyFish

Non-stop Poster
Reaction score
146
give us some war stats when the fight starts :D

also it seems scarry when people noble barbs and not players yeah :)
 

DeletedUser108039

Guest
give us some war stats when the fight starts :D

also it seems scarry when people noble barbs and not players yeah :)
unknown.png
 

Deleted User - 31145

Guest
First 12 hours and there would have been others if they hadn;t left/restarted before the nobles hit

Side 1:

Tribes: ~SH~, ~SH2~
Side 2:
Tribes: SCO, SCOX2

Timeframe: Forever

Total conquers:

Side 1: 31
Side 2: 26
Difference: 5

chart


Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 6
Side 2: 0
Difference: 6

chart


Points value of total conquers:

Side 1: 42,480
Side 2: 25,946
Difference: 16,534

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 12,018
Side 2: 0
Difference: 12,018

chart
 

Deleted User - 31145

Guest
And please get your facts straight the rule was no barb nobeling unless you had proof you cleared it and had reports

and you was contacted to talk about the silly squabbles between the 2 tribes as it as stunting players growth not to join forces with SH-IT against ed!
 

Mr Blood Frenzy

Guest
Like wakeling said. all the Barbs, But 2 where Noble by ~SH~ where active players with hard reports showing they clear the person. SCO and SH agreed no Barb or Bonus Nobbling with out getting permission from council members. Would you all like to see the screen shots of all these agreements ???? Their own council member Broke that and noble a barb when other council members told the SCO council member no. That they where breaking the agreement. This was second thing SCO had broken in the agreement of being / become allies. The first in the agreement was they where to Kick all their players that SH had clear. We where in the middle of clearing and turn their members into farm and had made couple their members restart. They Failed to do so. So we waited to see if they would do what was agreed upon. Then the Barb issue came up. Now as Far ED! tribe goes, We held up our Naps with them. If SCO thinks we where going to aid or help them against ED! Sorry we never agreed to do so. We agreed to not attack you guys so your tribe SCO could deal with ED! tribe, cause they where giving SCO problems.


BTW Here updated war stats image.
 

Attachments

  • war stats.jpg
    war stats.jpg
    188.6 KB · Views: 12

stormchild

Guest
Drew in Sco on the shared tribe forum was asked nicely not to take that 87 point barb that is between grim and I. Also it was not in his church radius. Grim said if he still took that barb it would get catted everyday.
 

DeletedUser123333

Guest
it was a dumb idea to go to war over a single 100 point bonus vill taking - this leads me to believe that ~SH~ has no intention of keeping an alliance moving.
Also SCO should have dumped drew straight away or made his lose the vill.. also why he was the tribe diplomat I have no idea.. no people skills and gets all mardy over taking a bonus vill
 

Undead Royalty

Guest
Drew in Sco on the shared tribe forum was asked nicely not to take that 87 point barb that is between grim and I. Also it was not in his church radius. Grim said if he still took that barb it would get catted everyday.

I know nothing
 

Deleted User - 3704809

Guest
it was a dumb idea to go to war over a single 100 point bonus vill taking - this leads me to believe that ~SH~ has no intention of keeping an alliance moving.
Also SCO should have dumped drew straight away or made his lose the vill.. also why he was the tribe diplomat I have no idea.. no people skills and gets all mardy over taking a bonus vill

The barb was posted in the noble planner and also the shared forum with ~SH~ with an explanation for why he wanted to noble that barb. It sat in the forum for well over 48 hours before Drew went ahead and nobled it. After ~SH~ spit their dummy out, we even offered to surrender the village. But as you quite correctly pointed out, ~SH~ had no intention of honoring the alliance from day one and grim reaper. was just looking for any excuse possible to break it. I've said all I am going to on the matter. There is no sense wasting valuable time AND effort on these childish squabbles. This game is worse than a daycare center full of toddlers.
 

Thunderace

Guest
Just a lot of mud-throwing here, a bit unnecessary in my honest opinion. Good luck in the war, alliances are overrated anyways :D
 

shadowcrei

Guest
9 - 0

Im favor of sh

*eating popcorn* while they are argue whos right or wrong.
 
Last edited:

DeletedUser107359

Guest
The honorable barb munching tribe declared on the dishonorable barb acquisition specialist tribe. Truly amazing!
 

Deleted User - 3704809

Guest
This is to make an official thread


The tribe is now at war with SlaughterHouse!

War name: Remove The Barb Munchers

Declaration:
Bye Bye Barb Munchers,

you where warned more then once.

Your Council member Sangsters Gangsters Said and we quote "SCO - Sangsters Gangsters today at 02:16 Thanks Quote Edit Delete
ok you ppl dont know me and i will tell you now, you dont tell my members what they can noble and what they cant, it is is called growth you dont like it... get you big girl panties on and deal with it, Drew will not be demoted, and the village is his, you dont like it..! tough shit, you have a issues, mail me... simple"



SO Mail Him and complain about the attacks and lost villages now...


Good Bye !
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

There are always multiple sides to a "story", so SCO wishes to address the lies used to coerce other tribes into a war. First, I must say, "Watch your back ED! That 'unbreakable' NAP you have with ~SH~ is as breakable as the shifting wind in their eyes." Second, I KNOW I have not BB-coded and linked everything within this narrative. My apologies, but when you work and have a RL outside of TW, attempting to post during your "working hours" means you either play TW or lose your job (I choose my job, so I posted this quickly).

SCO was originally approached by wakeling about establishing diplomacy and joining an alliance between ~SH~, ~SH2~, and SH-IT to take out ED! Needless to say, ~SH~ cannot even adhere to its own agreement. Between the time the agreement was enforced on 4/7/19 and ending on 4/14/19, and the nobling of barbs discussed extensively, ~SH~ and ~SH2~ took FOUR barbarian villages compared to the one barbarian village that one SCO member took, and that was ONLY after the barbarian village had been posted in the forum, the strategic location of the barb explained, etc. grim reaper with ~SH~ felt it fair game to cheat the noble planner during this period and yet had the nerve to dictate to SCO about “dismissing” a council member over the nobling of the barbarian. We we presented evidence over the noble planner cheat, ~SH~ wouldn't even think of punishing grim reaper. Funny how the truth behind the matter is always quite different and cheats and cowards have to resort to lies to play a game.

BARBS NOBLED BY ~SH~/~SH2~ BETWEEN 4/6/19 - 4/14/19 (period during which diplomacy was in effect):

[03] Goan (537|454) K45 681 Barbarian Smee [~SH~] 2019-04-13 18:47:31
Shes got the Jack (528|485) K451,579 Barbarian Wasted Rock Ranger [~SH~] 2019-04-13 13:50:13
004 (499|480) K44 1,477 Barbarian Killer willard [~SH~] 2019-04-12 04:37:08
002 Allfadern (530|499) K45 1,835 Barbarian Brokenfear [~SH~] 2019-04-06 17:12:17
002 St. Stephen (527|499) K45 162 Barbarian UnKnownThreat [~SH~] 2019-04-06 10:04:02
002 (508|480) K45 106 Barbarian Killer willard [~SH~] 2019-04-03 19:54:05
002 Pandora (511|455) K45 190 Barbarian Divining [~SH2~] 2019-04-11 23:01:59

BARBS NOBLED BY SCO/SCOX2 BETWEEN 4/6/19 - 4/14/19 (period during which diplomacy was in effect):

These two were nobled AFTER we issued the order to all players to noble every barb around ~SH~ when they broke the treaty:
Bonus village (567|451) K45 203 Barbarian sweetfairy [SCO] 2019-04-14 13:13:41
002 (578|479) K45 754 Barbarian hzrd [SCO] 2019-04-14 11:39:47

And this is the ONE barbarian to the SEVEN that ~SH~/~SH2~ took over which ~SH~ had its meltdown:
004 Claires Lair (519|488) K45 87 Barbarian drewtolo [SCO] 2019-04-13 07:03:07

Wow! Look at those "war" stats! Great job, ~SH~! You have JUST proven to the entire world that YOU are nothing more than barb noblers! 34 Barbarian conquers and 61 of your conquers (46.56%) from untribed players!

https://www.twstats.com/en107/index.php?page=tribe&id=44&tab=conquer_stats
 
Top