Gicusan
Guest
Is that a sarcasm?
no. i really urge all enemy tribes to build many, many swords.
Is that a sarcasm?
I prefer swords to HC.
Swords rule.
1 sword:
1 population
General Defense 50/pop
Cavalry Defense 15/pop
Archer Defense 40/pop
1 HC:
6 population
General Defense 200/6 pop = 33.3333/pop
Cavalry Defense 80/6 pop = 13.3333/pop
Archer Defense 180/6 pop = 30/pop
Sure, swords take a lot longer to build, but they are sure worth it.
Exactly right. Don't let these BD noobs tell you HC is better. Keep building your spear/sword/archer defenses!
Good luck with your build, and travel times, when I nuke all your villages
DJ you baffoon ... you're not supposed to let on there's a problem with swords :icon_rolleyes:
I think everyone understands that HC travel faster then swords, that doesn't mean it's better. I'v had the HC vs SW debate with many people, and I have yet to see a convincing argument for either side that proves it is better then the other. It's the travel time vs. stopping power argument.
Lots of people decided to jump on the HC band-wagon and automatically assume it's superior. HC might be a players personal preference, but a player would have to be fairly ignorant to think swords are useless or noobish. Using a "HC strat" does not neccesarily make you a better player.
Either way we'll fight you, just giving you guys some advice to have some honor for fairplay. Even if you play dirty I welcome you, I'll stand my ground. Also, you don't have to teach me about strategies like knocking down walls, attack rotation, stuffs, etc, even a rookie in TW would know that.