Skype vs Onfire (Offical thread Merged)

Status
Not open for further replies.

DeletedUser

Guest
Agree with poqq.
Merging isnt a bad thing. And a merge is bound to happen sooner or later.
Just as beowned said, most wars don't end with total domination, usually a merge.

Sure, discussing the benefits of a merge is reasonable. but just flaming because one tribe got stronger through recruitment is hardly worth time.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Finny50 said:
You did not "recruit a "few active solid players". You merge entire tribes into you, again if you need a count it's 3. On 3 different separate occasions. If it was just a "few active solid players" those other tribe would still be a tribe and have players in them. They don't seeming as how you recruited all the players in said tribes, thus it's called a merge.

And actually our is different. We've never merged with an enemy tribe. When VIRUS merged into shAve we weren't enemies I was actually about to discuss an alliance. So actually, it was EXTREMELY different. lol
Click to expand...

"Entire tribes"

Really? entire tribes?

Might wanna check that statement.

When we started the war with onfire we had a team of about 8-9 players that were always going to join, but for war purposes & their position we wanted them here after our first wave of ops hit. In the meantime they sat in MT, check the stats, we didn't even take half of MT, first proof of your incorrect statement. We were never at war with MT so recruiting a few of their players was not a merge. If the duke of that tribe chose to disband after we'd taken these players, that was his choice & it was not a merge.

IBM consisted of a few players from the former tsu & were players that had shown ability & put out a decent showing against onfire. Yes we took in a decent amount of their players, but again I think that was just voer half. Once again, not the 'entire tribe' as you stated.IBM was a merge but only in the sense we took the players we saw that were up to the standards of my fellow tribemates.

In regards to onfire again, we will not be recruiting their 'entire tribe' just the few active solid players that have proven they can play as it should be played. Yes it is a merge, so pat yourself on the back for that, but we are not taking the 'entire tribe', just those that we deem to be good enough & have proven this.

So your merge with virus was just like ours with IBM.

:icon_razz:
 

DeletedUser

Guest
you shouldn't have to explain yourself to anyone... do what's best for your tribe, bottom line of survival... if others don't like it they need to try and stop it in game.

Words here make people look quite foolish...
 

DeletedUser

Guest
candidus said:
you shouldn't have to explain yourself to anyone... do what's best for your tribe, bottom line of survival... if others don't like it they need to try and stop it in game.

Words here make people look quite foolish...
Click to expand...

And we wont now, I just felt that needed saying. Now things are clarified we can move on & leave the trollers to troll
 

DeletedUser

Guest
poqq hows it going? And as long as onire dont start all there drama and ego's i think the merge wasnt that bad o an idea, All that was ever wrong with onfire is they had to big of an ego to be any decent.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
This isn't a simple merge. This is a merge between two enemies..not exactly the same thing. They flamed each other for a month maybe so I'm sure there's not a lot of lost love between most of the active members in the two tribes.

Sure you can say it's a good move for them as skype would have probably never took K54 from onfire (yet they had crazy claims of it lol). But you also need to take into consideration how all the players will mix in together now and play together. Wouldn't have flamed them if they wouldn't have lied and try to make everybody near believe shave was planning a merge with onfire and they needed the merge so they won't be caught in between and be sure targets. If you're doing the merge for good reasons then why lie and deceive about the motives?

Also if you're confident about the new tribe and their players then why mail the surrounding tribes and ask if they want to join against us? :) You said it, all we did is merge so far, surely we're not that scary.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DeletedUser

Guest
poqq said:
"Entire tribes"

Really? entire tribes?

Might wanna check that statement.

When we started the war with onfire we had a team of about 8-9 players that were always going to join, but for war purposes & their position we wanted them here after our first wave of ops hit. In the meantime they sat in MT, check the stats, we didn't even take half of MT, first proof of your incorrect statement. We were never at war with MT so recruiting a few of their players was not a merge. If the duke of that tribe chose to disband after we'd taken these players, that was his choice & it was not a merge.

IBM consisted of a few players from the former tsu & were players that had shown ability & put out a decent showing against onfire. Yes we took in a decent amount of their players, but again I think that was just voer half. Once again, not the 'entire tribe' as you stated.IBM was a merge but only in the sense we took the players we saw that were up to the standards of my fellow tribemates.

In regards to onfire again, we will not be recruiting their 'entire tribe' just the few active solid players that have proven they can play as it should be played. Yes it is a merge, so pat yourself on the back for that, but we are not taking the 'entire tribe', just those that we deem to be good enough & have proven this.

So your merge with virus was just like ours with IBM.

:icon_razz:
Click to expand...

*sigh* your comprehension skills are as bad as Vei's.... Never said we didn't merge... /facepalm

As for MT, seeming as how 99% of the players who left MT in the last 2 days it was a tribe are either no existant or in your tribe. That's a merge.

Then you state: "So your merge with Virus was just like ours with IBM."
You state yourself that was a merge.

Then you pat me on the back for proving OnFire was a merge. So my count is still 3 different tribes on 3 different separate occasions. Not sure why you're trying to argue with those facts. lol
You've merged 3 times, once with an enemy tribe.

shAve has merged 1 time, with 0 enemies.


So like I've been stating this entire time:
-You've mass recruited roughly about 36 players since the new year from about 3 different tribes... Not sure how you claim to have quality.
-You've merged 3 times on 3 separate different occasions
-Grats on being the first war merge.

Why you trying to argue with facts again? lol
 
Last edited by a moderator:

velibor

Guest
Shave tribe changes 225
Sky Fire tribal changes 151

Try and explain it any way you want stats show the truth.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
velibor said:
Shave tribe changes 225
Sky Fire tribal changes 151

Try and explain it any way you want stats show the truth.
Click to expand...

Tribe changes are stats now? :lol:

Name: ~Solidarity~
Tribe Changes: 236

Guess that means ~ONE~ is crap as well? :lol:


Try and explain how tribe changes account for ANYTHING other then the fact it proves you have more dead weight. Less tribe changes, more members. Weren't you told not to post anymore? :lol:
 

DeletedUser

Guest
poqq said:
And we wont now, I just felt that needed saying. Now things are clarified we can move on & leave the trollers to troll
Click to expand...

well said... *moving on now*

Finny50 said:
Tribe changes are stats now? :lol:

Name: ~Solidarity~
Tribe Changes: 236

Guess that means ~ONE~ is crap as well? :lol:


Try and explain how tribe changes account for ANYTHING other then the fact it proves you have more dead weight. Less tribe changes, more members. Weren't you told not to post anymore? :lol:
Click to expand...

Yes... ~ONE~ is crap, we love everyone the same :icon_wink:
 

DeletedUser

Guest
funKy- said:
This isn't a simple merge. This is a merge between two enemies..not exactly the same thing. They flamed each other for a month maybe so I'm sure there's not a lot of lost love between most of the active members in the two tribes.

Sure you can say it's a good move for them as skype would have probably never took K54 from onfire (yet they had crazy claims of it lol). But you also need to take into consideration how all the players will mix in together now and play together. Wouldn't have flamed them if they wouldn't have lied and try to make everybody near believe shave was planning a merge with onfire and they needed the merge so they won't be caught in between and be sure targets. If you're doing the merge for good reasons then why lie and deceive about the motives?

Also if you're confident about the new tribe and their players then why mail the surrounding tribes and ask if they want to join against us? :) You said it, all we did is merge so far, surely we're not that scary.
Click to expand...

No reply to this though? :icon_rolleyes:
 

DeletedUser

Guest
velibor said:
You're too stupid to argue with...one second you accuse us of doing nothing but mass recruit everyone under our banner...i show you proof you recruited more than we did and you say well ONE recruited just the same...
Click to expand...

You mass recruited. We did 1 merge.
Although I guess you can say you didn't mass recruit, you just did 3 merges but I'd still consider that mass recruiting. :lol:

I give it less then a month and you have more tribe changes then us. *thumbs up* Tribe changes show jack all. But hey, if it's the only thing you have to use. Feel free. lol
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Can't find anything to say, nothing at all is good. :)

Also, this can be closed now. OnFire won the war but merged into SKYPE. The end.
 

DeletedUser74142

Guest
There was no winner..or loser in this war..we both gained ... end of discussion..topic can be closed

considered a merger or not..from any of the tribes u managed to list above...we have our members..we feel confident with our group of guys now..if you dont like it..that is ur preference :)
 

DeletedUser

Guest
trentster93 said:
There was no winner..or loser in this war..we both gained ... end of discussion..topic can be closed

considered a merger or not..from any of the tribes u managed to list above...we have our members..we feel confident with our group of guys now..if you dont like it..that is ur preference :)
Click to expand...

There always has to be a winner in WAR, even if it is hugging your enemies :)
 

DeletedUser

Guest
The winner was Skype and Onfire
The loser was the world.
The more immediate loser was sHave and any other tribes planning on eating those 2.
Now they are a stronger tribe. Now the world has another tribe to deal with.
Now its time to see the sparks fly :)
 

DeletedUser

Guest
supernubz said:
Now they are a stronger tribe.
Click to expand...

That's not what i am hearing, I am hearing there is a lot of problems. It wouldn't surprise me within the next few days, To see a whole new tribe form over this. I can't wait to see the fireworks.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
supernubz said:
The winner was Skype and Onfire
The loser was the world.
The more immediate loser was sHave and any other tribes planning on eating those 2.
Now they are a stronger tribe. Now the world has another tribe to deal with.
Now its time to see the sparks fly :)
Click to expand...
Really? We are loosers because two tribes merged instead of fighting? I'm pretty sure I can forsee future wars involving your tribe and how they end..Mass merge ftw?!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top