ALessonInPointWhoring
Contributing Poster
- Reaction score
- 408
Honestly can't recall anyone being anywhere near PP. I could be wrong, it was some years ago and the memory is blurry.
It was after nobling that he got a huge lead.
Honestly can't recall anyone being anywhere near PP. I could be wrong, it was some years ago and the memory is blurry.
Also just an aside but the ones who bang on about how important it is to be a teamplayer are generally those who need to be carried by said team rather than do the carrying themselves.
Also just an aside but the ones who bang on about how important it is to be a teamplayer are generally those who need to be carried by said team rather than do the carrying themselves.
I don't respect most of you. It's not due to your color, it might be due to your creed.
Don't blame ya! I don't even respect myself!
The problem here is that people dont really appreciate the scale of this game and their own relative abilities.
In stealthy's case he's probably better than 90% of the player base so in that sense he is 'skilled' however given that still means that 10% of players are better than him thats still thousands of people per world. I mean you can be better than 99% of the playerbase and still not be very good in comparison with the ones who are better than 99.9% of TW players.
Theres also the consideration that there are so many different aspects of the game and you can be talented at some of them but poor at the others. I know multiple world winners, rank 1 players who are fantastic macro players who would easy crush me in account building but cant snipe. And that is completely okay, it takes a lot more 'skill' in my mind to build an account properly and cycle troops efficiently than it does to hit a button at a certain millisecond although both are important skills in terms of overall gameplay. Good snipers get a lot more recognition/acknowledgement than the guy who nobles barbs smartly and gets a solid account going which is kinda unfair. People just dont appreciate how important it is to be well-rounded player and some of the best players in this game just get on and put the work in day in day out and quietly do the job that needs doing.
If someone is purely good at the early game and consistently achieves top results then you can easily say that they are one of the best at start-ups but you cant say they are one of the best TW players because start-up takes a small fraction of the overall world timescale. Yes some things just scale up and are fundamentally the same from 100-10000 villages but the management of scaling up is in itself a skill. Personally i find lategame boring and you'll rarely find me logging in once a world is 'won' and its clean-up time to get the win % and for that reason i would never consider myself a great player because I dont play all aspects of the game at a high level
Also just an aside but the ones who bang on about how important it is to be a teamplayer are generally those who need to be carried by said team rather than do the carrying themselves.
speaking of this ^ Is there a fake limit on this world? I miss the days of ruining people weekend with 20 thousand attacks
Eh, that to me is largely dependent on circumstances that can't really be generalized. Defense tends to rebuild much faster than offense, so long as you don't have a shortage of defense (and as far as I'm concerned you shouldn't, I tend to play close to 70% D), you should be able to stack against nukes and typically come out well ahead when doing so.
Best Rank: 0 15th September 2009