Sohk

DeletedUser

Guest
There was a breaking of the tribe rules therefore Vodka Mixed was kicked and Knarley left soon after, but my understanding was that he was to be kicked also for a internal unauthorised by the leadership.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
They got kicked for nobling 3 barbs or something. It makes perfect sense.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
you forgot to add in the point to your 3 jeff. should have been 3 point barbs :p
 

DeletedUser

Guest
pokemon you do know they have this thing called twstats right? use it some time. Vodka Mixed nobled far more then 3 barbs, he has 8 pages of them. however in BS unlike bush, we have no per say no barb at all rule. however we do have a no nobling under 5 point barb rule. we also from time to time check and see what the tribe members as a whole are doing. its called actually running a tribe, mike should try that some time. Vodka Mixed was asked to mix in actual player towns with barbs more, his response was to begin taking the 3 point towns listed in twstats(you may want to start using that). when mailed about that as it was against tribal rules, he told the council it was none of their business. so he then became none of the tribes business, as he was shown the door.
none of this is rare on tw. most tribes will not recruit players that noble 3 point barbs, as it is seen as wasteful and frankly useless. even during start stages of worlds. there are cases for it, and if so the players are then mailed to ask why. if their answer is much like Vodka Mixed then they are shown the door in tribes. in some cases such as bush, they have no barb at all rules. jeff himself should know that as he was on that council of that tribe. and during his time on the council of that tribe, bush players where booted from the tribe for breaking that rule. some that where in bush far longer then jeff himself, but the council had rules. rules can be changed over time, if enough people in the tribe want them changed, but just ignoring the rules in place gets you what you have seen. just as it got the bush players that broke jeff's council rules what they got. and these rules are far less harsh then back then.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Whats the deal with leadership nobling barbs to then?..seems contradictory?
 

DeletedUser

Guest
I don't know about you David, but they didn't have 3 or 5 point barbs in my day.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
GreenKnight. you must have been in a hurry and didnt really read my post. i said "however in BS unlike bush, we have no per say no barb at all rule. however we do have a no nobling under 5 point barb rule." taking barbs is not against the rules, its only asked to be limited. however anything under 5 points is against the rules unless given a decent reason. jeff frankly i have no idea what you said?
 
One Last Shot...

One Last Shot...

Contributing Poster
Reaction score
1,552
davidga said:
jeff frankly i have no idea what you said?
Click to expand...

He said that 3 and 5 point barbs have yet to exist in this game.

Which is a valid point - it may be worth altering your rules to at least cover the 26 point lowest-form barb :icon_redface:


Equally useful rules would include, but not be limited to:

"Don't noble any empty green squares."
,
"Don't ask questions to which you know we don't know the answer."
and
"Don't take your pets off their leads when launching."
 
Last edited:

DeletedUser103644

Guest
Don't forget the most important rule here

''Don't noble the lakes''

I mean would be unfair if some players could have a better water supplies than others right?
 

Repinski

Guest
Even worse than nobling the lakes though, is nobling the mountains. I mean could you imagine the strategical advantage a village would have by being up hill?!
 

DeletedUser103644

Guest
Repinski said:
Even worse than nobling the lakes though, is nobling the mountains. I mean could you imagine the strategical advantage a village would have by being up hill?!
Click to expand...

Ah of course! when we are at it lets mention the forrest. Which would provide excellent cover against mounted archers and archers as well as provide loads of extra wood :icon_eek:
 

DeletedUser

Guest
googly i see you are a bit bad at reading posts as well. read closely, very closely. what does under mean? that covers your 26 point lowest-form barb and then some. doesnt w62 keep you busy?
 
One Last Shot...

One Last Shot...

Contributing Poster
Reaction score
1,552
davidga said:
googly i see you are a bit bad at reading posts as well. read closely, very closely. what does under mean? that covers your 26 point lowest-form barb and then some. doesnt w62 keep you busy?
Click to expand...

Under means below. So,

however in BS unlike bush, we have no per say no barb at all rule. however we do have a no nobling under 5 point barb rule.
Click to expand...

You can't get barbs under/below 5 points, so the rule is a little irrelevant.

Maybe you're just not very good at being clear in your posts :icon_razz:

And W62 doesn't keep me too busy right now, thanks for asking though :)
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Attack there water supply on Lake Noob by peeing in it : OK
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top