St A is....awesome

[DeletedUser5984]

Hi deacon,
being the Aten member that took your isolated village..
(that red dot was bugging me :icon_razz: )

I must say i was a bit surprised to see 45 support incoming
from 90 to 200 hours away on a 12 hour noble attack..

i even made a thread about it in |D's forum.. claiming it was funny
then i checked your twstats and saw that before my ennoblement there were 2 intribe ennoblements.. so i guessed you had just quit and cleared the villages for your mates..:icon_rolleyes:

but. it seems that it was not the case.... *ouch*..

Kurai is right though.. you should file a support ticket...
(just read you did the service thing.. )

(incomming support is down to ~25 )

 

[walleye]

life is an abstract concept, and to each takes a different form

apparently to kurai life takes the form of the act of religiously logging into a computer game every day regardless of an obtrusive variables. NOTHING IS IMPORTANT WHERE TRIBAL WARS IS CONCERNED

 

[DeletedUser]

life is an abstract concept, and to each takes a different form

apparently to kurai life takes the form of the act of religiously logging into a computer game every day regardless of an obtrusive variables. NOTHING IS IMPORTANT WHERE TRIBAL WARS IS CONCERNED

THATS EXACTLY THE SAME AS YOU GOD DAMN IT

 

[DeletedUser]

Send the troops back mate as you may kill someone's noble with luck :lol:

Hi deacon,
being the Aten member that took your isolated village..
(that red dot was bugging me :icon_razz: )

I must say i was a bit surprised to see 45 support incoming
from 90 to 200 hours away on a 12 hour noble attack..

i even made a thread about it in |D's forum.. claiming it was funny
then i checked your twstats and saw that before my ennoblement there were 2 intribe ennoblements.. so i guessed you had just quit and cleared the villages for your mates..:icon_rolleyes:

but. it seems that it was not the case.... *ouch*..

Kurai is right though.. you should file a support ticket...
(just read you did the service thing.. )

(incomming support is down to ~25 )

 

[walleye]

THATS EXACTLY THE SAME AS YOU GOD DAMN IT

heh heh
you and i both know we dont have a life at this time of this year
well you do maybe, but youre going to fail your exams

 

[DeletedUser2566]

Cry me a river :icon_cry:

Seriously though you left your account without checking it for 2 weeks and they rimmed your pathetic self. Go cry somewhere else. I think any decent tribe would have done it sooner.

2 weeks no communication = rimsville for you.

Even cpt jack would agree (no offense cpt )

hmph, shouldn't decent tribe be able to sit one member for 2 months? or maybe few guys were sitting all those st guys in particular area as it was only 2 guys renobling what we gained in bit f'ed up op.

 

[DeletedUser]

a million point non-premium account? You ever tried doing that on top of your own?

 

[DeletedUser]

Interesting.

I was wondering about certain StA accounts being taken over at lightning speed by StA letely...

And even more interesting is the fact that this is a very serious rules infraction.

Are we at Aten once again playing on an uneven field against St A, going through the pains of wasting attack armies on inactive, sitted accounts while St A has a sitter empty villages for easy takeover?

Will our attack armies be hitting stacked villas, stacked by sitters that are emptying defense troops?

If this is true, then my opinion of St A just dropped through the floor.

 

[DeletedUser]

well, I do believe the major issues here are A, the rules infraction which I believe happened on big behalf, but I'm still waiting to hear on my service report whether this is true.

And that contact should at least be attempted before a year and a half of someones work is thrown out...

oh, and I lost 3 villages to my mates since my last post!

 

[DeletedUser]

I am not saying that St A did well on that, my opinion has gone down on them. And I am not saying this aint ilegal BUT.

But I see loads of inactive takeovers by ATEN inactives too, if you force me even more.

So please do not generalize, it offends all St A members whilst most of them werent the culprits of this sad incidents.

 

[DeletedUser]

I am not saying that St A did well on that, my opinion has gone down on them. And I am not saying this aint ilegal BUT.

But I see loads of inactive takeovers by ATEN inactives too, if you force me even more.

So please do not generalize, it offends all St A members whilst most of them werent the culprits of this sad incidents.

To delete confusion that post was made after Idefix's post referring to him, not to anyone else.

I also meant lots of inactive takeovers by ATEN players, not by ATEN inactives.

 

[DeletedUser]

a million point non-premium account? You ever tried doing that on top of your own?

Aye, It aint fun at all.

 

[DeletedUser]

Interesting.

I was wondering about certain StA accounts being taken over at lightning speed by StA letely...

And even more interesting is the fact that this is a very serious rules infraction.

Are we at Aten once again playing on an uneven field against St A, going through the pains of wasting attack armies on inactive, sitted accounts while St A has a sitter empty villages for easy takeover?

Will our attack armies be hitting stacked villas, stacked by sitters that are emptying defense troops?

If this is true, then my opinion of St A just dropped through the floor.

looks like the only thing you've been wasting your armies on lately are intribe enoblements :icon_wink:

 

[DeletedUser]

To delete confusion that post was made after Idefix's post referring to him, not to anyone else.

I also meant lots of inactive takeovers by ATEN players, not by ATEN inactives.

Indeed.

And I just used 7 attack armies clearing out villages of an Aten inactive - armies that would otherwise be hitting St A.

How many of the St A attack armies that have been hitting Aten villas are only around because they did not have to be used on taking over inactives, I wonder?

People who don't play on a level playing field just plain suck. :icon_evil:

 

[big092701]

Listen Deacon..

The decision was made to end your account sit after you became a liability to us. You had no contact with anyone for over a month. Your troop counts were piss poor, you had no premium.. the list goes on.

Pepper handed me the account, as I saw your villages were being nobled by ATEN, and he didn't have the time to properly defend. I tried my best to deal with your account (and your sim city troop levels) for a few weeks.. with not much luck. Your villages in K44 were being picked off one by one, and I didn't believe it was our responsibility to keep you safe anymore, with you obvious neglect. I am sure you would not have even come back, had you not gotten that inactivity e mail.. Am I right?

I have done nothing illegal with your troops. I simply sent your defense to a village that was being attacked... no harm in that right? The account sit was ended, and there was no nobling that took place until at least a day or two later.

I know how it must have looked Deacon, but you have to see it from our point of view. St A has been under the heat lamp before for long term account sitting.. and because of it, its not something we do anymore. We gave you a month to come back.. even pop in to say hi.. but it never happened. Is it our responsibility to attempt to establish contact with you, over your account? I doubt it... If you were THAT worried about it, you would have checked in... even if only for minute.

Stop blaming others for your mistakes. I did nothing wrong, and I am sure that's what the Mods will tell you.

GL on the other worlds that you obviously cared more about.

 

[DeletedUser]

Wrote a long spiel but it got deleted so in short.

Deacon you asked if I could sit the account, I said sure. You left, never any coorespondence, no log in, no premium. Never any mention of how long you would be gone, I assumed 2-3days while the Aten attacks were incoming, after a week I passed the account on to another player.

It was not 2 weeks since you have been gone. It has been a month itleast I can look up the exact date if you would like.

Itleast 15-20players were asked if they had any means of contacting you or were in contact with you. Noone knew how to get a hold of you. Those same people asked if anyone knew how long you'de be gone. Noone knew that either. We gave the account another week after that. You still had not returned... The decision went out that you had gone inactive.

With no contact, never one log in for even 2 minutes, the account I can say was leaking villages to Aten with no premium and extremely low troop count and hundreds of incoming. With you never returning, time was given... The decision went out to noble you out. I didn't take any villages but if you had been in my region I may have.

In all honesty as long as were here talking how long would it have been till you logged in? 2 months 3 months 6 months?

You never logged in even for a 2minute check up, never e-mailed anyone never MSNed anyone Never told anyone how long you would be gone.

Like I said, If you decide to stay I'll help you out, but my opinion coming on here slandering is semi bad taste. I get being pissed off, but never telling anyone how long you plan on leaving for, never checking your account for over a month? The only thing I seriously view as a possible bad move on anyone here was any possible removal of troops. Nobleing you out though... with the way it happened, not a good or bad thing in all honesty. Its just a thing.

For anyone who may come on here jumping saying "poor baby", yeah maybe, but no notification of how long being gone? I mean you get a mail saying "hey can you sit me I got incoming" you say sure... then you get set as stter for over a month and the player has still not returned? You contact ovr 20 of your members asking if anyne has heard from"player" or knows how long they'll be gone or returning? How long do you keep sitting a heavily under attack account with no premium and 100+villages before considering the account inative? Granted I am not defending sending troops if that was done. But the nobling, in a sense I can defend it.

-Pepper

 

[DeletedUser137]

It is forbidden to send suicide attacks from an account you are sitting to clean for other accounts (unless it is part of an agreement that does not put the account at a disadvantage)

You are not allowed to use information about any accounts you are sitting for attacks from your own account, or provide this to other players, even after the sitting has ended.

He is put at a disadvantage by you clearing his armies onpurposely THEN using that information to have him rapidly nobled within the tribe.

Both St A accounts will be banned.

Aten has had bannings in the past so we now leave al troops in the village and actually attack the villages with all its defence in. The sitter NEVER posts which villages are defense or not so we attack them as if they were freshly abandoned villages.

 

[DeletedUser]

I have done nothing illegal with your troops. I simply sent your defense to a village that was being attacked... no harm in that right? The account sit was ended, and there was no nobling that took place until at least a day or two later.

Pfft, if it is an isolated village where the troops obviously won't get there in time and your intent as a tribe is to noble the guy shortly or you are already in the process of nobling him out, then it sure as hell is illegal.

Tbh, I don't care what your nobling policies for inactive members are, that's your thing, but from looking at twplus lately it has been obvious that you have been nobling empty villages of inactives. And to now hear that at least one of those was a sitted inactive really makes those of us who continully state to their members that "sitters may not empty villages" wonder at just how large of a disadvantage we are because of stuff like this.

 

[DeletedUser]

He is put at a disadvantage by you clearing his armies onpurposely THEN using that information to have him rapidly nobled within the tribe.

Both St A accounts will be banned.

Aten has had bannings in the past so we now leave al troops in the village and actually attack the villages with all its defence in. The sitter NEVER posts which villages are defense or not so we attack them as if they were freshly abandoned villages.

Well, this is at least the Aten|E standing order.

To all Aten members reading this thread from all Aten tribes, I will openly make this request(just in case it is not 100% clear yet):

play by the books, people. There is no glory in succeeding by bending the rules.

Idefix
An Aten|E Warlord

 

[DeletedUser5984]

Listen Deacon..

I have done nothing illegal with your troops. I simply sent your defense to a village that was being attacked... no harm in that right? The account sit was ended, and there was no nobling that took place until at least a day or two later.

*cough* bs *cough*...
and since you post this..

you sent all of his forces 5+ days away...
before that village was under attack
(my attack was 12 hours.. )
so that you could have an easy takeover...
and you got busted because deacon returned..

And you only did that since with the new change the troops outside the village disappear when the village is nobled... so it doesnt matter if the
troops are on a 200hour trip... or 5 hour trip...

If that change hadnt been implemented you would have suicided his
troops on Aten villages..

I hear a banstick ... do you ?:icon_rolleyes: