St A is....awesome

DeletedUser

Guest
If what you say is true, that he did have low troop levels, what does that say about St A? I sure hope no one else is like this, but you had better check.

If you find one termite in your home, you've got to assume there's more thus poison them out or something.

What really gets me is that Deacon is a Saints member, and Saints reps for this are defending them selves and attacking in an argumentative fashion. A defense makes you guilty of something, because you're defending it. If it were me in your situation saints, I would disregard this thread and talk to Deacon about it privately and at the end of things, sum it up.

In my eyes, you're not helping yourself more than you're damaging yourself.
 

chelsentus

Guest
Kurai said:
meh go cry somewhere else. He abandoned his account and his sitters F'ed him Get over it, it's just a game. You can't deal with logging in once a day? Then don't complain about what happens to your account. You think what was done was against the rules? Then file a ticket and let's keep the forum whine free.
Click to expand...

agrees
 

DeletedUser3160

Guest
big092701 said:
ohhh nooo

/me trembles :icon_rolleyes:


If I get banned over this, meh well.. It is a game right? I had fun.
Click to expand...

you won't get "banned", you will loose the right to play your account for 3-4 days until they figure out a suitable punishment. Then you will loose 10-30 villages and you can play again.

Just ask Pepper, he knows about these things :icon_wink:
 

ArtFull

Guest
look on the bright side deacon, now you have all the time in the world for you school things.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Tazoslo said:
you won't get "banned", you will loose the right to play your account for 3-4 days until they figure out a suitable punishment. Then you will loose 10-30 villages and you can play again.

Just ask Pepper, he knows about these things :icon_wink:
Click to expand...

My case was different though, think I mailed you about that already if not mistaken, my ban in that case was crap and I almost quit in protest over the punishment. Anyways though.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
"Are we at Aten once again playing on an uneven field against St A, going through the pains of wasting attack armies on inactive, sitted accounts while St A has a sitter empty villages for easy takeover?"

Yes, because we're better than you to answer the first question. Second question, or course, who doesn't? If fact cleaning out inactive players villages for you would be a rules breach.

Will our attack armies be hitting stacked villas, stacked by sitters that are emptying defense troops?

Yes, yes, and no. Why wouldn't we stack friendly villages with troops from sitted accounts? How is it not in the accounts best intrests to hold the line with Aten?
 

DeletedUser

Guest
deacon said:
well, I do believe the major issues here are A, the rules infraction which I believe happened on big behalf, but I'm still waiting to hear on my service report whether this is true.

And that contact should at least be attempted before a year and a half of someones work is thrown out...

oh, and I lost 3 villages to my mates since my last post!
Click to expand...


You do realize whether or not the admins do anything your time on W2 is over right? I mean, we are going to rim you over this post regardless of whatever else happens.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
I've been through 3 years of constant test and exams at Uni, work, a girlfriend and a social life, and I still manage to log in every day. In fact, the only time I've been sat in the last year was for like a week when I went on holiday. Deacon, if you were that concerned you should have been here. Simple as.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Tien Lung said:
"Are we at Aten once again playing on an uneven field against St A, going through the pains of wasting attack armies on inactive, sitted accounts while St A has a sitter empty villages for easy takeover?"

Yes, because we're better than you to answer the first question. Second question, or course, who doesn't? If fact cleaning out inactive players villages for you would be a rules breach.

Will our attack armies be hitting stacked villas, stacked by sitters that are emptying defense troops?

Yes, yes, and no. Why wouldn't we stack friendly villages with troops from sitted accounts? How is it not in the accounts best intrests to hold the line with Aten?
Click to expand...

Ah, lovely how there is absolutely no sense of wrong-doing from high profile St A players and even from the duke himself. :icon_rolleyes:

Seeing that this kind of thing has happened multiple times before with St A, your attitude does not really surprise much, and definitely indicates that your supposed clean image is a sad farce.

And no, it is not in the interest of sitted players to have their villages being emptied in preparation for their own tribe nobling them... :icon_confused:
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Dark Chaos said:
A defense makes you guilty of something, because you're defending it.
Click to expand...

By that logic I'm a drug dealer because I defend people's right to buy any drug they feel like injecting into their arms even though I've never even touched so much as a joint.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Baximus said:
I've been through 3 years of constant test and exams at Uni, work, a girlfriend and a social life, and I still manage to log in every day. In fact, the only time I've been sat in the last year was for like a week when I went on holiday. Deacon, if you were that concerned you should have been here. Simple as.
Click to expand...


Exactly. TW = Study Break. 1 hour midterm studying 5-10 min. TW. University increases my TW time, and makes it so I'm checking in almost constantly, not the other way around.
 

walleye

Guest
Idefix said:
Ah, lovely how there is absolutely no sense of wrong-doing from high profile St A players and even from the duke himself. :icon_rolleyes:

Seeing that this kind of thing has happened multiple times before with St A, your attitude does not really surprise much, and definitely indicates that your supposed clean image is a sad farce.

And no, it is not in the interest of sitted players to have their villages being emptied in preparation for their own tribe nobling them... :icon_confused:
Click to expand...

you sound extremely bitter today

deacon was being nobled by enemies, as a St A member you could argue that it was in the St A member's best interest to have his villages donated to tribesmates rather than enemies.

if St A hadn't done this, deacon would have logged in today, rubbed his eyes, and went "WHY DIDN'T YOU DEFEND MY VILLAGES?"
 

DeletedUser

Guest
I have my final exams in 7 days, yet I've still been spending a few hours each day on here.
 

kommissarwulf

Guest
I've taken breaks from the game. I took 3 weeks for a holiday and then extended it by a week to let me get settled into my new course. Not everyone is so willing to split their time between things. In my case I was starting a Foundation Degree Course, wanted to make sure I wasn't going to get overwhelmed by it. I did, however, keep in contact with my sitter periodically letting them know what was happening.

deacon says he was in contact online with members of the tribe, tribesmates say otherwise. It's all a bit screwy if you ask me. I see no problem with Saints dropping the sitting to noble his towns. It sucks, and I feel bad for deacon since he came back, but it happens. The fact that all of the towns were seemingly sent in support of an isolated, unattacked, town is highly suspect though.
 

DeletedUser3160

Guest
Pepperbro said:
My case was different though, think I mailed you about that already if not mistaken, my ban in that case was crap and I almost quit in protest over the punishment. Anyways though.
Click to expand...


I know, I think the whole rule is crap, but thats my opinion. The admins are more interested in upholding what they think is right, then what the actual playing community thinks is for the best of the game...:icon_rolleyes:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top