Repinski
Guest
actually i think you do.
take a look at how many villages pirana and crash control and how many active players they have that aren't going to give up the world without a war. and then compare it to your weak daily success in the war against both pirana and crash. and you will find out even if both crash and PIRANA stop nobling any further villages of today. it will take decades for womble to conquer the world.
pirana stats as an example :
Side 1:
Tribes: PIRANA
Side 2:
Tribes: Womble
Timeframe: Last week
Total conquers:
Side 1: 404
Side 2: 434
Difference: 30
Total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 4
Side 2: 17
Difference: 13
Points value of total conquers:
Side 1: 3,338,963
Side 2: 3,995,793
Difference: 656,830
Points value of total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 38,035
Side 2: 164,585
Difference: 126,550
well they conquer 404 total villages last week and womble reduced it by 17 to 387 , that say me despite your winning over stats you need a hell more of an effort to really damage a tribe at size of pirana otherwise you are warring an endless war that eventually come to an end by a internal problem which wont happen for PIRANA or your people lose motivation over months and womble go downfall and this world will be just another of those lazyass boring worlds warring an endless war.
What you've just failed to realize are the vital aspects of the fish growth and the decreasing amount of players in this world.
--Fish growth point A. (I've used the last week just like you have to match your example.)
The barbs. There are only so many of them and they make up a lot of the current fish diet. They will however eventually run out and that will cut their growth by 1/4th proven here.
[SPOIL]Side 1:
Tribes: PIRANA
Side 2:
Players: <i>Barbarian villages</i>
Timeframe: Last week
Total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 102
Side 2: 0
Difference: 102
Points value of total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 669,884
Side 2: 0
Difference: 669,884
Now that is a 1/4th lead on conquers we are now out growing them by. Taking them specifically or not.
--Fish growth point B. (Again 1 week chart.)
They aren't actually growing in size by another 1/4th of their nobles proven here.
[SPOIL]Side 1:
Tribes: PIRANA
Side 2:
Tribes: -DIE-
Timeframe: Last week
Total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 109
Side 2: 6
Difference: 103
Points value of total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 1,032,133
Side 2: 58,099
Difference: 974,034
They are eating their academy which will eventually remove their family status but I've now cut their growth that you pointed out in half. Lets see if I can cut it even more shall we?
-- Fish growth point C.
Here are a few splinter tribes that left -DIE- because they didn't want to lay down and take it from the bigger fish.
[SPOIL]Side 1:
Tribes: PIRANA
Side 2:
Tribes: P2, CAPM, Bellum
Timeframe: Last week
Total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 44
Side 2: 0
Difference: 44
Points value of total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 444,551
Side 2: 0
Difference: 444,551
I have just taken that 404 and cut it into 149 compared to Womble's 434 by pointing out the limited food supply of barbs and the fact that a lot of what they are eating isn't actual growth. Guess what though, I've got one mroe thing to point out about their growth.
-- Fish growth point D.
[SPOIL]Side 1:
Tribes: PIRANA
Side 2:
Tribes: PIRANA
Timeframe: Last week
Total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 59
Side 2: 59
Difference: 0
Points value of total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 561,404
Side 2: 561,404
Difference: 0
That's another 59 conquers that aren't actual growth which drops their growth down to 90 to Womble's 434. Now to be fair, I will cut Womble in the same ways.
[SPOIL]Side 1:
Tribes: Womble
Side 2:
Tribes: Womble
Players: <i>Barbarian villages</i>
Timeframe: Last week
Total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 241
Side 2: 116
Difference: 125
Points value of total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 2,236,488
Side 2: 1,087,129
Difference: 1,149,359
That did just cut our 434 to 193 but there are two major differences. 1) We have less internals/Conquers with no growth. 2) Our 241 barbs/internals equals 2.2mil which shows that our barbs were mostly 9k barbs unlike PIRANA's 102 barbs to 636k. That's a 6,567 average which means those villages still need a good deal of work while ours can be potent from the start.
All this shows that we have a 103 lead on PIRANA when it comes to conquering player villages and actually growing in size. That's over twice as fast since PIRANA have a growth of 90 villages excluding barbs which are limited. (I excluded barbs in the Womble tally also.)
And finally the final vital factor you've forgotten about is that in 3 weeks we have dropped from roughly 2000 players down to roughly 1200 players and half price coins come at 1000 players. That means barb supply will disappear faster while we can noble more villages that actually add to our growth. If we are currently leading with 2:1 ratio of village growth compared to the fish, double that for both us and it becomes a 4:1 ratio.