Bloodhood
Part of the Furniture
- Reaction score
- 182
While I agree with the mudslinging etc is half the game, the bad part of it is 99% of the people are terrible at it and, thus, not worth the time.
Some of the people post well thought out arguments and perspective and even if it's wrong you can at least see the perspective.
Like the debate between vlath and you is a decent debate (although tiresome by this point) and you can certainly SEE both sides even if you disagree with one side or the other.
And then you have hefty and warham throwing their 20 village weight around on the forums that can be amusing at times.
Then there are the trolls like citizen kane, that, even though he's an idiot his posts still make you laugh.
But then you have tribes posting 'stop merging and war' then flip back to the in game tab and continue their planned merge, another tribe saying they don't mass recruit when they lead the world in tribe changes and another tribe complaining the world is boring because no one will war when they are only in position to fight one real war so they allied with that tribe.
The bottom line is there are 4 or 5 top tribes currently emerging from this world and all of them have different leadership styles. None of them are right and none of them are wrong, they are simply different. We won't know which one is 'right' for a few more years and just because it was 'right' on this world doesn't mean it will be 'right' on the next world. But it seems the externals has turned into a place that's less about propoganda/politics/debate and more of a place where people come to say how bad the other tribes way of doing it is, even when they are activing very similarly behind the scenes, and that is what has led to the decline of pnp.
So, while the 'tribal' part might be half the game, coming to the externals to listen to hypocritical drivel and the weak excuses as to why it's not hypocritical becomes tiresome at times and you can often find the 'tribal' part of the game in your own message boards more exciting, entertaining, and fulfilling than listening to people on the externals posting opinions and insisting they are facts.
I agree with much of what you say. But it remains that the Punch! vs Zombie argument is just one argument. And we are just two tribes. Throughout this world we may have been the only two to continue a sustained argument with each other. I see that the fact that we can and do do that as a positive for thing for this world. What is missing is not a different kind of debate like you suggest, but more debate. There will always be circles of different quality debates, but when the pool of debating is small and only between two tribes posting you end up with a lower quality externals.
The fact that I think some tribes withdraw themselves from the externals, then ally with ever enemy except the weaker one that will make themselves grow best (and in the safest way), as well as the fact that there is a more player central culture as I spoke about, we are really reducing the quality of the world as the fight becomes less interesting.
There is one huge thing to remember. Tribalwars is only numbers. We may see it in graphics, but it is only data given context in which we then embroil ourselves to have a virtual fight between multiple players. Part of the fight that should be and often is more important is the politics, the verbal war. Every time someone says "less chat more war", I think them getting a high on little more than numbers and calculations. The only bit with some degree of subjectivity is the arguments and word play that can accompany wars and ultimately is what initially made this game very interesting, and why it is often so interesting at the start of a world when forums are more active.
The reason why world 6 is often quoted as such a good world, is due to the multi-dimensional forum. Nearly every tribe had a presence, and it really was a battle of wits and tactics in and out of game. There were several leaders that were good at arguing with different view points and self interest, which created a as I say a multi-dimensional forum. This multi-dimensional forum was key to the world, as these different forces impacted directly on the world, greatly altering its politics and makeup. A multi-dimensional forum, creates a multi-dimensional world. A good world, starts with a good forum.