I figured your last post was 5 posts ago, but I see you are following in the footsteps of Al. Poor guy, he was also never good at letting things go. I call it failure because TEA have shown themselves willing to use the tools in the playbook, yet only apply them in particular cases. Honour? Balls? TEA has none of those things, never have, never will, a tiger can't change its stripes. Not to say it is a bad thing at all, it is just the way the game is played. that being said, it is illogical in my mind to be willing to destroy a tribe from the inside say, but then not willing to hug a rim tribe to allow you to focus on BiP. That inconsistency of approach suggests to me that TEA failed to get those agreements though I could be wrong. The implications are simple, whoever Infamy chooses to join will probably win due to considerable size advantage and the gangbanged tribe having to deal with a very large front. I might have not mentioned it overtly, but I assumed it was pretty obvious that the gangbang would tip the balance to one side.