The Robbers and the Penguins

[DeletedUser]

If Shaggy told your son to spill milk all over your carpet that you have spent $5 a month on for the past (almost a) year, then you lost $60. Now multiply that by the 30+ players in PITA, and Shaggy just tried to intentionally cheat you out of having a carpet that's worth around $1,800, I'm sure you'd be pretty mad at your son too.

It's just a little sad that rather than play the game by outplaying one's opponents, one thinks they have to try and go behind others' backs to win.

I don't believe that in chess, I've won because I switched my opponent's pieces around to more favorable positions for me while his back is turned; do you? If so, then I guess we simply have different moral precepts and different reasons for playing our games.

You are making the assumption shaggy was directly involved, which seems to be inaccurate. But I'll play your game, lets extrapolate your numbers and change the scenario on a much larger scale. There are people in this game that do not play by the rules. The people multi account, phish accounts, etc. Now that one player has an advantage over all the others that play by the rules. So at 5 bux a month x 900 players (the impact is even greater on new worlds with 10,000 players) so 4500 a month or 54,000 a year. Seems to me disbanding a tribe that just reforms is insignificant compared to others that are cheating.

 

[DeletedUser]

You are making the assumption shaggy was directly involved, which seems to be inaccurate. But I'll play your game, lets extrapolate your numbers and change the scenario on a much larger scale. There are people in this game that do not play by the rules. The people multi account, phish accounts, etc. Now that one player has an advantage over all the others that play by the rules. So at 5 bux a month x 900 players (the impact is even greater on new worlds with 10,000 players) so 4500 a month or 54,000 a year. Seems to me disbanding a tribe that just reforms is insignificant compared to others that are cheating.

If Shaggy condoned it, agreed with it, or helped orchestrate it (any of the three, not all three are necessary), then he's as morally reprehensible as the other thread suggests and therefore I am correct. And seeing as the player went ahead with it after talking to Shaggy, even if it wasn't Shaggy's idea it was clearly condoned by Shaggy and therefore he is morally reprehensible, and the other thread is correct.

And yes, others cheating does affect the game; but it doesn't affect every single player in the world. This, on the other hand, affects an entire tribe.

But even if that weren't faulty logic, you're only serving to help my point; cheating is bad, and so is what Shaggy did or condoned. Therefore either way, you're arguing for my side.

Don't play my game; you always seem to end up on my side in the end.

 

[DeletedUser]

If Shaggy condoned it, agreed with it, or helped orchestrate it (any of the three, not all three are necessary), then he's as morally reprehensible as the other thread suggests and therefore I am correct. And seeing as the player went ahead with it after talking to Shaggy, even if it wasn't Shaggy's idea it was clearly condoned by Shaggy and therefore he is morally reprehensible, and the other thread is correct.

And yes, others cheating does affect the game; but it doesn't affect every single player in the world. This, on the other hand, affects an entire tribe.

But even if that weren't faulty logic, you're only serving to help my point; cheating is bad, and so is what Shaggy did or condoned. Therefore either way, you're arguing for my side.

Don't play my game; you always seem to end up on my side in the end.

ethically/morally wrong is different than breaking the rules. What I stated was a clear breach of the rules, what you are saying is what you/others believe is ethically wrong, which is not in breach of the rules (not saying I agree with the co's actions). Additionally, you have your AFTER in the wrong place. He talked to shaggy AFTER he disbanded the tribe. From what I see posted here, shaggy did not have his hand in what this player did.

 

[DeletedUser]

As I said in the other thread, it seems pretty apparent he talked to Shaggy before the disbanding, and then made it look like he was covering it up. How would Shaggy say that James was responsible before James even said it was him and asked him to add his skype?

Poor covering up. Very poor.

I said it was ethically wrong. Seeing as rule-breaking discussion is not allowed on the forums, I'm not going to get into that. But ethically speaking, it's sad and it only shows how low GotRob will sink; to even condone this is sad. I've seen many tribes have their enemies disband due to a rogue coplayer, or even just lose an account because of it, and most enemies respectfully say they would've wanted to continue the fight on fair ground and win on fair ground; the idea that GotRob condones this, and indeed may have organized it, shows both desperation and fear of PITA. Furthermore, it only served to revitalize PITA...looks like that backfired on GotRob.

 

[DeletedUser]

I'm done, this is getting stupid.

 

[DeletedUser]

'Course you're done. Don't answer question then suddenly the argument is pointless. I wonder why.

 

[DeletedUser]

Everyone is wrong though Like all of you. The only person that knows what actually transpired is me!

 

[DeletedUser]

read this u6, which proved shagy or anyone in gotrob had anything to do with pita
of course, you will troll some more, trying to find a needle in a field. Good luck with that, it seems is all u are capable of

[21.09.2012 18:05:54] geani29: AxlTheCat
Points: 8.321.073
Rank: 1
Opponents defeated: 74.165.454 (3.)
Tribe:
[21.09.2012 18:05:55] geani29: lol
[21.09.2012 18:05:57] geani29: no tribe
[21.09.2012 18:07:30] geani29: no pita
[21.09.2012 18:07:31] geani29: lol
[21.09.2012 18:07:32] geani29: lol
[21.09.2012 18:07:33] geani29: lol
[21.09.2012 18:27:47] shaggy rogers: PITA disbanded?
[21.09.2012 18:27:56] geani29: yes

 

[DeletedUser]

This message is hidden because geani29 is on your ignore list.

Oh the beauty.

 

[DeletedUser]

*wonders how many players have "new" incomings from eternal lord and/or shaggy rogers to PITA. villages now*

 

[DeletedUser]

'Course you're done. Don't answer question then suddenly the argument is pointless. I wonder why.

b/c its tiresome to answer the same question asked different ways over and over and over.

 

[DeletedUser83759]

stop this stupid arguing and do some actual fighting.

 

[DeletedUser105552]

As I said in the other thread, it seems pretty apparent he talked to Shaggy before the disbanding, and then made it look like he was covering it up. How would Shaggy say that James was responsible before James even said it was him and asked him to add his skype?

Poor covering up. Very poor.

I said it was ethically wrong. Seeing as rule-breaking discussion is not allowed on the forums, I'm not going to get into that. But ethically speaking, it's sad and it only shows how low GotRob will sink; to even condone this is sad. I've seen many tribes have their enemies disband due to a rogue coplayer, or even just lose an account because of it, and most enemies respectfully say they would've wanted to continue the fight on fair ground and win on fair ground; the idea that GotRob condones this, and indeed may have organized it, shows both desperation and fear of PITA. Furthermore, it only served to revitalize PITA...looks like that backfired on GotRob.

I expect nothing more from you!!

 

[DeletedUser]

shaggy had nothing to do with this!

the reason why we know james did it was because he told me via skype what he had done almost right after he disbanded pita.

i then let our leaders know what james did.

end of story.

 

[DeletedUser]

read this u6, which proved shagy or anyone in gotrob had anything to do with pita
of course, you will troll some more, trying to find a needle in a field. Good luck with that, it seems is all u are capable of

[21.09.2012 18:05:54] geani29: AxlTheCat
Points: 8.321.073
Rank: 1
Opponents defeated: 74.165.454 (3.)
Tribe:
[21.09.2012 18:05:55] geani29: lol
[21.09.2012 18:05:57] geani29: no tribe
[21.09.2012 18:07:30] geani29: no pita
[21.09.2012 18:07:31] geani29: lol
[21.09.2012 18:07:32] geani29: lol
[21.09.2012 18:07:33] geani29: lol
[21.09.2012 18:27:47] shaggy rogers: PITA disbanded?
[21.09.2012 18:27:56] geani29: yes

i believe as you have said be4 pictures or it didnt happen....screen shot it as ^this can be faked.

 

[DeletedUser]

Screenshots can be faked too. I'd be more than happy to post a demonstration, if you doubt me.

 

[DeletedUser]

yes but im quoting geanie as she likes to say that however never does the same. im going under the assumption (i know i know i shouldn't assume) that she might not know how to.

 

[DeletedUser]

As a PITA member I don't think rob had any say in what happened. James was acting alone and contacted Shaggy afterwards in search of gratification. We will be continuing business as usual despite the info that has been passed to rob

 

[DeletedUser105552]

As a PITA member I don't think rob had any say in what happened. James was acting alone and contacted Shaggy afterwards in search of gratification. We will be continuing business as usual despite the info that has been passed to rob

Great, someone's finally come to sense. You might want to give half of your brain to u6, would help me massively.

 

[DeletedUser]

yes but im quoting geanie as she likes to say that however never does the same. im going under the assumption (i know i know i shouldn't assume) that she might not know how to.

why do you think i care about what u are saying?
Everybody knows now we had nothing to do with it

so, ur post its useless