DeletedUser
Guest
Save your bitter smiles as it's obvious from this and previous posts of your that you know nothing about Havok apart from the fact that they rimmed you and your tribe. You are entitled to hate them for that and be biter of course. However Havok did not collapse. It was [bold]deleted[/bold] by the founding duke one fine morning after the first signs of inactivity. Both original Dukes quit W22 - graciously in my view informing the rest of the tribe as to why they did so.What happened to Havok when the leaders left? oh yeah it collapsed, maybe not through the leaders losing their villages but regardless you have backed up earlier claims leaders are key to tribes
The vast majority rest of their active members continued playing together as FL - DR and eventually D3TH and started dropping out after well documented events regarding Ywevis' plots.
I never said leaders are key to tribes. Bad leaders are key to their failure though. The only crucial thing leaders have to do in my opinion is recruit properly and act as normal sensible human beings. Their recruits are the key.
.as those you spoke for 5 posts up, being COD, XXXX, BDeath. Are you sure you're following what you post?Other tribes such as?
Yes the difference is that their massive back up was going for the easy targets as I've already mentioned above (apart from a small well known team who still go for the big targets, guess who I'm talking about)And XXXX may have done that against D3TH and fair play, but they had a massive backup in the shape of XIII and they have done the same as every sensible tribe since becoming a dominant independent power (not to suggest no independent beforehand or belittle their achievements).
Exactly Andy. Wake up! If you wanna call the disappearance of MJ a collapse, go ahead and do so. I'll try not to smileWhat leader was that then aye? Your the only leader there, I'm pretty sure if I left even if Mad stayed the loss of half the members would be construed a collapse.
"Only idealists and large players who sit around procrastinating (i include myself in that)..." you said itI'm no idealist, I long ago came to terms with the fact that nobling noobs is the way to go, why bother with the hard players when noobs are so easy. A cowardly tactic to some sure, but hell I'm still here and thriving and they are gone.
Sorry if I misunderstood you! Maybe you should have said "I include my self in the latter"
Well you're entitled to play as you like and enjoy and I never had any illusions right from the moment I first met you until now that this is what you did, do and will be doing. However, such a tactic/philosophy hardly entitles you to defend your leadership qualities or tease opponents for their inadequacies i.e CoD.
At least some of their 'Great leaders' had the admirable quality to step down and let other take the reigns when the obvious became too obvious. It's called graciousness and self respect.
What you call 'Thriving' many have called 'Pointwhoring' but I never believed them.
This is what I meant exactly whe I talked about 'softest players' - (i include myself in that)