Top 10 Notable Tribes

DeletedUser90609

Guest
I be Founder of Sweet :icon_eek:

Just $$$ and I.R.E seemed to have been targeting my players of late dont know why :icon_confused: all i can say is that they havent had one successful clearance :icon_twisted:
 

DeletedUser

Guest
dahFuze is alive! :O

But no, your tribe is not a notable tribe. They are go bye-bye soon. ^_^

And ganja, that's hilarious. Those two were just in a war. Apparently their solution at peace is to find a mutual enemy in one of the smallest (yet well-protected) tribes in their general area.
 

xRedDevil

Guest
I have only one bad thing to say about shAve and that's they've gone down a route i've never seen work for very long in this game for yet and that's quality over quantity, eventually they will collapse, but how soon is the question. My bets is a while yet, but it will happen.
 

DeletedUser102104

Guest
ganja-farmer said:
I be Founder of Sweet :icon_eek:

Just $$$ and I.R.E seemed to have been targeting my players of late dont know why :icon_confused: all i can say is that they havent had one successful clearance :icon_twisted:
Click to expand...


You were on 56?
 

DeletedUser

Guest
xRedDevil said:
I have only one bad thing to say about shAve and that's they've gone down a route i've never seen work for very long in this game for yet and that's quality over quantity, eventually they will collapse, but how soon is the question. My bets is a while yet, but it will happen.
Click to expand...
No way. shAve are gonna be around for a long time ;o
 

DeletedUser

Guest
xRedDevil said:
I have only one bad thing to say about shAve and that's they've gone down a route i've never seen work for very long in this game for yet and that's quality over quantity, eventually they will collapse, but how soon is the question. My bets is a while yet, but it will happen.
Click to expand...

In my opinion, having less members gives you the possibility to achieve better internal communication, as well as being able to not restrict skilled and proper players by having them help the 'weaker' players, simply by not taking any 'weaker' players.

Also: when with fewer players, you can of course have more care for the individual wishes and demands of players... Why that would be a good idea for a tribe could be read in this topic.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
fewdesires said:
dahFuze is alive! :O

But no, your tribe is not a notable tribe. They are go bye-bye soon. ^_^

And ganja, that's hilarious. Those two were just in a war. Apparently their solution at peace is to find a mutual enemy in one of the smallest (yet well-protected) tribes in their general area.
Click to expand...

shh. your just angry because we made your member quit
 
Last edited by a moderator:

xRedDevil

Guest
Doctor Jeroen said:
In my opinion, having less members gives you the possibility to achieve better internal communication, as well as being able to not restrict skilled and proper players by having them help the 'weaker' players, simply by not taking any 'weaker' players.

Also: when with fewer players, you can of course have more care for the individual wishes and demands of players... Why that would be a good idea for a tribe could be read in this topic.
Click to expand...

I agree but the problem is at the end of the day all the tribes that try the same technique all end up disbanding because they can't keep the activity up or are simply outnumbered, at least in all the cases that I have seen.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top