DeletedUser
Guest
Everyone is expecting a war, or an alliance, between 1337 and Skill. Actually, everyone's expecting a war, not an alliance, I'd think I'd be the only one not surprised.
Everyone is expecting a war, or an alliance, between 1337 and Skill. Actually, everyone's expecting a war, not an alliance,
SO, my opinion is that ALL of the top tribes should be clearing out their K's so ONLY they exist in their K's. Then go after all the weaker tribes. The ones that take the MOST number of weaker tribes will end up winning because they will have FAR more villages than the other of the top tribes. So, activity in a tribe is key. Then when only the top tribes exist then they battle each other.
Anything wrong with my idea/suggestion?
Before I say you are wrong, let me preface this with "I am a NEWBIE". This is my FIRST real time game I have EVER played in my life and I just started in February so I have VERY little experience.
So, what I say may be wrong. So, feel free to criticize me if I am wrong, but please point out my mistakes with examples so I can learn.
So, here it goes....
I PERSONALLY feel that any war between the top tribes is wrong. Let's take a look.
I won't be biased so I won't mention any names....
Lets assume TRIBE A declares war on Tribe B. They have a FULL outright WAR. Blows are going on both sides - villages lost and won all over the place. Tribe A looks like they are winning as they are gaining more villages.
Now, Tribe C and D have been watching noticing the exchange of villages (therefore all new villages are weak and have to be supported). So, now C and D which are weaker than A and B can go in and take all their villages away because all of their villages are strong while many/most of the villages of A are weak.
SO, my opinion is that ALL of the top tribes should be clearing out their K's so ONLY they exist in their K's. Then go after all the weaker tribes. The ones that take the MOST number of weaker tribes will end up winning because they will have FAR more villages than the other of the top tribes. So, activity in a tribe is key. Then when only the top tribes exist then they battle each other.
Anything wrong with my idea/suggestion?
Thanks!
Space Alien
easy ones r always easy. So, u should go for hard ones firstly and the timing is very important when u declare war on the hard ones.
uppps!?!?! will this get us into a war with skill?
SO, my opinion is that ALL of the top tribes should be clearing out their K's so ONLY they exist in their K's. Then go after all the weaker tribes. The ones that take the MOST number of weaker tribes will end up winning because they will have FAR more villages than the other of the top tribes. So, activity in a tribe is key. Then when only the top tribes exist then they battle each other.
Anything wrong with my idea/suggestion?
Thanks!
Space Alien
Pfft, didn't you learn anything from W5 Otto? You don't war anyone, you just get lots of allies
skinnytoothpick today at 01:38
this is a must!!! We have to stack our TSL front lines ASAP. Everyone must check the North forum and sign if they can give help or need help. We are looking to stack mainly 54 but some 53 area also.
Before I say you are wrong, let me preface this with "I am a NEWBIE". This is my FIRST real time game I have EVER played in my life and I just started in February so I have VERY little experience.
So, what I say may be wrong. So, feel free to criticize me if I am wrong, but please point out my mistakes with examples so I can learn.
So, here it goes....
I PERSONALLY feel that any war between the top tribes is wrong. Let's take a look.
I won't be biased so I won't mention any names....
Lets assume TRIBE A declares war on Tribe B. They have a FULL outright WAR. Blows are going on both sides - villages lost and won all over the place. Tribe A looks like they are winning as they are gaining more villages.
Now, Tribe C and D have been watching noticing the exchange of villages (therefore all new villages are weak and have to be supported). So, now C and D which are weaker than A and B can go in and take all their villages away because all of their villages are strong while many/most of the villages of A are weak.
SO, my opinion is that ALL of the top tribes should be clearing out their K's so ONLY they exist in their K's. Then go after all the weaker tribes. The ones that take the MOST number of weaker tribes will end up winning because they will have FAR more villages than the other of the top tribes. So, activity in a tribe is key. Then when only the top tribes exist then they battle each other.
Anything wrong with my idea/suggestion?
Thanks!
Space Alien
hmmm...? And you are? :icon_rolleyes:
We should be asking that question. :icon_rolleyes:
Meanwhile, anyone feel like doing a big 4(plus maybe a few more) analysis? Cause unless there are merges or surprises, the big 4 will stay the big 4 for a while.
He was from TSL, I believe his intentions is to cause war.
True, the forums are dominated by a couple of tribes and a neutral playerlol, 3DX was in fact the only big 4 without a known representative on the forums, except maybe ampatriot, least since sword left.
True, with the exception of war threads this is the most popular topic.