Let's put this another way, who else has done 47 in 15 hours on active targets?
Thats a fair enough reason. Can't argue the logic with this. I assumed you would have continued your attacks but caution is a good enough reason for the stats.Well the op was only on 2 players and they didn't have 100 villages put together. So don't know. I think we just expect more defense so we didn't go for as many villages. Both players are rimmed so not sure yet the op could have been better your right. All ops are never ran at what is thought will happen.
I don't disagree, but in terms of making a statement (and in Norse's first official war) having all the villages taken in a 2 minuet window (which I'm sure you would be able to do as it isn't hard) or having them in a number of windows, ie broken into groups of 15 villages per window would at least show greater organization. You guys have had long enough to plan this.Glad you said you assumed things, because you assumed a lot. The op participation was 43%. It actually doesn't matter how much villages you take in the first such and such timeframe as long as you get those villages eventually, which has happened.
I agree with you on one case, that just because norse have more villages, or @night, doesn't mean slow or 333 could win
|Rank||Tribe name||Points of the best 40 players||Total points||Members||Points per player||Villages||Points per village|
Regardless of what you guy's spam with , This will always be the one and single most truly best posts I've ever read.Lol this. If I wanted to war yolo we would have warred yolo and there would have been no council in the world that could have stopped me.