DeletedUser
Guest
However, it would be naive to say that the WFs are responsible for the attitude towards CoD.
They are not solely reponsible and I would agree with my next quote of yours.
In game tactics, p. messages, recruitment, account management and choice of allied tribes to mention a would get you in the same position even if none else apart from you and the 'likeable' Angels had ever posted here.
Coming back to the 'Solo' issue.... Although I don't work Solo, being tribeless means I can make decisions on who to attack, 'insult' and what to noble without negatively affecting others by pursuing my personal goals and foes.
Yes we have spoken about this in previously, and I agree that you can play your own game without the worry of others. One thing that I try to do is to not let personal feelings towards other players cloud my judgement when it comes to making decisions. I like to think that our council will make the best decisions for the tribe as a whole, saying that, you cannot please everyone.
I don't know quelgash or if he's right about CoD, but if If I had to recruit someone for my 'tribe', you'd be the first on the list despite your 'fishy' background.
:icon_redface: I am flattered by that remark and it is probably the nicest thing I have ever seen you post.
In regards to Q, he was the reason that I joined $CoD$. He was an excellent diplomat and did indeed, with clfdav, put in place the building blocks of $CoD$. Though I will beg to differ with some of his remarks on the forum more recently.