bluebattlekitten
Guest
I see that many people communicated announcements with an animal illustration, while its representation and they please me very much, because I like animals. I like the illustration of the Kaenguruhs
I see that many people communicated announcements with an animal illustration, while its representation and they please me very much, because I like animals. I like the illustration of the Kaenguruhs
What came first? The chicken or the egg?
In my opinion every tribe with more than 50 members is a tribe full of idiots :icon_eek:
But i do not see even one tribe in the top 40 with less than 50 members ?!? :icon_neutral:
whats wrong with you here? :icon_eek:
In my opinion every tribe with more than 50 members is a tribe full of idiots :icon_eek:
But i do not see even one tribe in the top 40 with less than 50 members ?!? :icon_neutral:
whats wrong with you here? :icon_eek:
the best tribe on the game is currently ranked in the 400's, the names hells legion or HL tag, cool pic also :icon_twisted:
All this "who is the best" talk in the begin of the world is seriously, Not Kool
we wont be stopping those Guides anytime soon cuz that is what helps the noobs which is what our tribes goal is...
Sounds like False and I are in agreement. Now, let me extend a little wisdom. What matters are three things.
1: Village organization.
2: Geographic logistics.
3: Quality of leadership and members.
You look at these three things when determining if a tribe is worth its salt. If a tribe can out-produce, out-maneuver and out-fox another tribe, it is better.
Having 75 members means NOTHING. Member count is meaningless. What matters is...
1: Do these players have well organized villages?
2: Is there a logical geography that makes for good supply lines and troop movements?
3: Are the members skilled and active players; do the leaders succeed at measuring a situation and coming up with positive solutions?
All the biggest-point tribes (top 10 lets say) -could- be the best in the world, but the fact that they have been top of the points heap the whole time shows they've focused on points.
Others have a lot of players and a pitiable average-per-player. That shows poor quality control.
Other tribes have most of their members in one area, have decent point values without having focused on it, and have solid leadership. THESE are the tribes to watch!
I think his point, Sumner, is that we now know the location of 664 different farms.
All this "who is the best" talk in the begin of the world is seriously, Not Kool
Sounds like your opinion is wrong.