W22 War Scores

darkaniken2

Guest
Side 1:
Tribes: $CoD$ COD~A -TBP-
Players:

Side 2:
Tribes: ~I~ ~=I=~
Players:

Timeframe: Last week

Total conquers:

Side 1: 856
Side 2: 679
Difference: 177

image.php


Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 349
Side 2: 68
Difference: 281

image.php


Points value of total conquers:

Side 1: 7,194,489
Side 2: 5,820,680
Difference: 1,373,809

image.php


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 3,261,272
Side 2: 628,756
Difference: 2,632,516

image.php



Side 1:
Tribes: RBE BDeath Plague
Players:

Side 2:
Tribes: LEGIT LGTSLW
Players:

Timeframe: Last week

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 82
Side 2: 65
Difference: 17

image.php


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 734,036
Side 2: 621,874
Difference: 112,162

image.php



Side 1:
Tribes: [D3TH] D3ATH D3TH-D
Players:

Side 2:
Tribes: XXXX XXXXX ~K52K~
Players:

Timeframe: Last week

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 100
Side 2: 122
Difference: 22

image.php


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 955,074
Side 2: 1,054,210
Difference: 99,136

image.php




If I missed anyone, please tell me.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
I am hurt Dark-A... EXP not important enough to register for the war scores.... :(

EXP and EXP-V against ~3~39 and Co
 

darkaniken2

Guest
Powerbonds said:
I am hurt Dark-A... EXP not important enough to register for the war scores.... :(

EXP and EXP-V against ~3~39 and Co
Click to expand...
I didn't add because I don't know exactly who you are warring. Is -3- part of it?
 

darkaniken2

Guest
Side 1:
Tribes: EXP EXP-V
Players:

Side 2:
Tribes: ~3~39 ~A-
Players:

Timeframe: Last week

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 82
Side 2: 22
Difference: 60

image.php


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 698,094
Side 2: 202,918
Difference: 495,176

image.php
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Eagleye350 said:
seriously EXP? come on now... i expect more from you guys. lol
Click to expand...

Still regrouping, Contrary to what a lot of people aparently believe we were declared on, not the other way around, with the element of suprise I would have expected them to noble more, as before this war, most of our Northern support was otherwise engaged.

This is not to make any excuses, we should be doing better. But not much better. At the moment we are doing fine and most of ~3~39's conquers have been retakes.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Ruud60 used to have a battlefields thread, but he rarely posts on here. But a good thread like this should be stickied, its nice having war stats.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Yeah and to keep them all in an organized fashion. Thanks to darkaniken for volunterring to eternally post warstats:icon_smile:
 

Bobnbob82

Guest
if we were to have war stats, i would update. i will check elsewhere first though, hopefully someone already has auto-updating scripts.
 

Angel Styles

Guest
I guess the FLAME wars on the other posts can't be helped =^.^= The SELF updating WAR stats would be awsome though, good idea.

Herb you mean FLAMEolitics =^.^=
 

DeletedUser

Guest
War stats will always be subjective, and people will always be arguing over them.

We sticky the maps because you can't argue over who owns which villages, but war stats are different. They can be manipulated to paint whatever picture you want them to.

A thread like this will become just another place (in addition to the pnp threads) where people argue pnp. The only difference is it will be for ALL wars.

This will be a huge spam thread.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
If they are self updating, you can't really change them you know.
 

darkaniken2

Guest
I'll update these 3 times a week. I'll post seperate posts for each war, and try and give an idea of what happened since the last update, as in branches disbanding, members jumping ship, etc. Talk to mccorn if you want em stickied.
 

darkaniken2

Guest
EXP vs ~3~39

Side 1:
Tribes: EXP EXP-V
Players:

Side 2:
Tribes: ~3~39
Players:

Timeframe: Last week

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 109
Side 2: 26
Difference: 83

Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 927,879
Side 2: 236,948
Difference: 690,931

The declaring tribe has fallen far back in the caps in only a few days. I've seen worse, but this is one of the most failing scores I've seen in a long time.


-TPB- and $CoD$ vs ~I~

Side 1:
Tribes: -TBP- $CoD$ COD~A
Players:

Side 2:
Tribes: ~I~ ~=I=~
Players:

Timeframe: Last week

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 344
Side 2: 66
Difference: 278

Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 3,231,513
Side 2: 613,586
Difference: 2,617,927


Well, it's been a little over a week now. -TBP- and $CoD$ pull further and further into the lead. However, many ~I~ players are fighting hard, including tatisan. Kudos to them.

[D3TH] vs XXXX and K52K

Side 1:
Tribes: [D3TH] D3TH-D D3ATH
Players:

Side 2:
Tribes: XXXX ~K52K~ XXXXX
Players:

Timeframe: Last week

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 152
Side 2: 142
Difference: 10

Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 1,436,543
Side 2: 1,246,652
Difference: 189,891

Though the start was rocky for [D3TH], they seem to be pulling ahead.

RBE and BDeath Vs LEGIT

Side 1:
Tribes: RBE BDeath Plague
Players:

Side 2:
Tribes: LEGIT SLW
Players:

Timeframe: Last week

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 74
Side 2: 59
Difference: 15

Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 644,552
Side 2: 561,078
Difference: 83,474

By far the slowest war. I am dissapointed in BDeath, and even in RBE. If you are going to take the time to declare war, atleast use more than 12 members. This is just sad for the rank two tribe.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
By far the slowest war. I am dissapointed in BDeath, and even in RBE. If you are going to take the time to declare war, atleast use more than 12 members. This is just sad for the rank two tribe.
Click to expand...

maybe if the tribe was a challenege we would use more members.... and what do you know of war? lol
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top