DeletedUser
Guest
well, members of NOB!! are renown for their extra limb...
and yes, so add another 60+ names to the list
well, members of NOB!! are renown for their extra limb...
and yes, so add another 60+ names to the list
DeletedUser
Guest
that's like 140:1.
That covers basically all the non-Devils active players lulz
That covers basically all the non-Devils active players lulz
DeletedUser
Guest
That doesn't make sense. This whole thread is meant to see what people think ABOUT having the noble prices halved yet. We all know we haven't had them halved since the world started - the settings for this world meant they were cheaper than most worlds...
Do you want the packet prices cut in half, or would you rather they didn't?
ohh, thought i said. I'm for them.
weren't you the one that said they were halved already? i was simply saying the "halving" of the noble price was part of the world's settings. simply because i can see the staff saying the prices were already halved to begin with. If you weren't the one to say that, then my apologies, and if you were, I'm not saying anything directed towards you. Just throwing it out there
DeletedUser
Guest
I was saying the world started off halved. I was told I was wrong by Rohan, who said something about it being voted in early on. In whicih case they were already halfed
And okiedokie - I don't think I need to bother updating the opinion ratio any more tbh. I think it is clear that 99% of this world want it
DeletedUser
Guest
I was saying the world started off halved. I was told I was wrong by Rohan, who said something about it being voted in early on. In whicih case they were already halfed
And okiedokie - I don't think I need to bother updating the opinion ratio any more tbh. I think it is clear that 99% of this world want it
it's true the vote happened after the world started, i voted for it btw
but it was put as the settings of the world, In hopes they can use settings like it in future worlds, like w53 was it?
anyways, no need to further discuss this
DeletedUser
Guest
I think it would be too easy for pacov to dominate the world if nobles were cheaper.
DeletedUser
Guest
it's true the vote happened after the world started, i voted for it btw
but it was put as the settings of the world, In hopes they can use settings like it in future worlds, like w53 was it?
anyways, no need to further discuss this
There is need. That way this thread keeps getting spammed with partially on-topic discussion :icon_razz:
DeletedUser
Guest
... Just so you can increase your post count?
Postwhore. D:
But it would be nice if the admin team did look at closing our world/moving to the endgame phase... we've got less players & tribes than the worlds they have just announced are being closed in a week:
World 30
5,294 players, 396 tribes, 301,232 villages
World 31
1,943 players, 175 tribes, 232,802 villages
World 32
1,851 players, 173 tribes, 208,888 villages
World 33
1,011 players, 87 tribes, 159,699 villages
World 34
1,021 players, 117 tribes, 160,916 villages
World 39
959 players, 78 tribes, 142,598 villages
Postwhore. D:
But it would be nice if the admin team did look at closing our world/moving to the endgame phase... we've got less players & tribes than the worlds they have just announced are being closed in a week:
World 30
5,294 players, 396 tribes, 301,232 villages
World 31
1,943 players, 175 tribes, 232,802 villages
World 32
1,851 players, 173 tribes, 208,888 villages
World 33
1,011 players, 87 tribes, 159,699 villages
World 34
1,021 players, 117 tribes, 160,916 villages
World 39
959 players, 78 tribes, 142,598 villages
DeletedUser
Guest
About closing the world: I sent in a ticket, but Morthy responded saying that it was a bit too soon for W39 to be closed for people to join.
DeletedUser
Guest
I'm wondering if the staff is trying to get a system down. maybe w39 isn't old enough to them, could have something to do with profit
DeletedUser
Guest
Hey IAA? Can i Still Vote? I hope i didnt miss the deadline!!
Just woke up from a LONG slumber :lol:
DeletedUser
Guest
So I talked to Morthy about this.
[4:26:51 PM] Jeremy Leite: Morthy you here? (bandit)
[4:40:08 PM] Jon Dawson: yeah
[4:47:27 PM] Jeremy Leite: We of w39 believe it's time the admin team began thinking of closing our world to new registrations.
[4:53:31 PM] Jon Dawson: it's not quite tiem yet
[4:55:48 PM] Jeremy Leite: Seems time to me. :/
[4:57:55 PM] Jeremy Leite: We've got less players & tribes than the worlds they have just announced are being closed in a week:
World 30 - being closed
5,294 players, 396 tribes, 301,232 villages
World 31 - being closed
1,943 players, 175 tribes, 232,802 villages
World 32 - being closed
1,851 players, 173 tribes, 208,888 villages
World 33 - being closed
1,011 players, 87 tribes, 159,699 villages
World 34 - being closed
1,021 players, 117 tribes, 160,916 villages
World 39
959 players, 78 tribes, 142,598 villages
And I'm sure that if you made a poll for w39, 90%+ of the players would want it closed.
[4:58:11 PM] Jeremy Leite: There's even a thread about it on our externals.
[5:00:36 PM] Jon Dawson: well I said it's not time yet
[5:00:48 PM] Jon Dawson: the player count is nothing to do with how long the world has been running for
[5:01:34 PM] Jeremy Leite: No, but surely it's an indication that the world should be nearing closure. (think)
Simlply because a world has been running longer does not mean it is any closer to ending, and should closure not reflect the world's proximity to its final destination?
[5:01:58 PM] Jon Dawson: No
[5:02:18 PM] Jon Dawson: We close worlds in batches based on village count, tribe dominance or runtime
So err, there's your answer.
Top 75 merge into a super tribe to end the world faster? :icon_razz:
[4:26:51 PM] Jeremy Leite: Morthy you here? (bandit)
[4:40:08 PM] Jon Dawson: yeah
[4:47:27 PM] Jeremy Leite: We of w39 believe it's time the admin team began thinking of closing our world to new registrations.
[4:53:31 PM] Jon Dawson: it's not quite tiem yet
[4:55:48 PM] Jeremy Leite: Seems time to me. :/
[4:57:55 PM] Jeremy Leite: We've got less players & tribes than the worlds they have just announced are being closed in a week:
World 30 - being closed
5,294 players, 396 tribes, 301,232 villages
World 31 - being closed
1,943 players, 175 tribes, 232,802 villages
World 32 - being closed
1,851 players, 173 tribes, 208,888 villages
World 33 - being closed
1,011 players, 87 tribes, 159,699 villages
World 34 - being closed
1,021 players, 117 tribes, 160,916 villages
World 39
959 players, 78 tribes, 142,598 villages
And I'm sure that if you made a poll for w39, 90%+ of the players would want it closed.
[4:58:11 PM] Jeremy Leite: There's even a thread about it on our externals.
[5:00:36 PM] Jon Dawson: well I said it's not time yet
[5:00:48 PM] Jon Dawson: the player count is nothing to do with how long the world has been running for
[5:01:34 PM] Jeremy Leite: No, but surely it's an indication that the world should be nearing closure. (think)
Simlply because a world has been running longer does not mean it is any closer to ending, and should closure not reflect the world's proximity to its final destination?
[5:01:58 PM] Jon Dawson: No
[5:02:18 PM] Jon Dawson: We close worlds in batches based on village count, tribe dominance or runtime
So err, there's your answer.
Top 75 merge into a super tribe to end the world faster? :icon_razz:
DeletedUser
Guest
Lol.
Sure. I'm not counting votes any more as this is just a rather pointed discussion
icon_wink, but every person for it is an extra voice to be heard DeletedUser
Guest
DeletedUser
Guest
(bandit)
DeletedUser
Guest
DeletedUser
Guest
How in the world is World 30 so active. :icon_surprised:
DeletedUser
Guest
Is it just me or is Morthy seemingly stamping his feet and saying W39 is his toy and we have to play his way????
Based on his OWN CRITERIA we are due to close now!!!!
Crazy times....
Plus, our settings were half prices nobles from the start so does it not make sense more people would have been rimmed by now and so the world would move to end game quicker?
Based on his OWN CRITERIA we are due to close now!!!!
Crazy times....
Plus, our settings were half prices nobles from the start so does it not make sense more people would have been rimmed by now and so the world would move to end game quicker?
DeletedUser
Guest
Careful sticks - you may wanna edit that. Might be seen as modbashing!
DeletedUser
Guest
Really?!?
Come on guys and girls, it is an opinion and does not breach anything
Less fear and more forward thinking!
Come on guys and girls, it is an opinion and does not breach anything
Less fear and more forward thinking!
