Yes 'the letter' about the alliance.
well, your tribe (Snow) did war me, but you didn't parge.. hehe good old times, eh?
I am pretty sure "The letter" was given after the alliance was dropped, I am fairly certain.
I didn't war you yes, and you know why, do you want me to go into detail?
There has been a group hug in the east. I guess the leaders are following the rest of the world :icon_rolleyes:
WMD4 (LOL2 should change name shortly)
There is so many, hope I haven't missed anyone :icon_redface:
***Disclaimer**** I am merely a grunt. My tribe is not responsible of my Words/Actions
lol F. - lol, L.O.L2 AAA F. - AAA, AAA, AAA3, AAAAAA UTW#1 F. - UTW#1, UTW#2, UTW#3, UTW#4, UTW#5, UTW#6 BORED! F. - BORED!, NUBS WMD F. - WMD, WMD2, WMD3, WMD4,
Okay then I should be expecting to see those ex-motion now in FRST nobling whats left of motion or else your point is a moo point to use the immortal words of joey :icon_biggrin:So all partial merges=families because their a remnant or is it more likely they are just people abandoned to be nobled or ignored? To the latter I'd say yes, don't list them as families since they aren't.
no offense intended by this statement, but you didn't read my post correctly. I said "nobled or ignored" the main idea behind that was they don't have anything to do with us anymore. By leaving it doesn't declare war neither does it affirm peaceful relations with each other.Okay then I should be expecting to see those ex-motion now in FRST nobling whats left of motion or else your point is a moo point to use the immortal words of joey :icon_biggrin:
I read your post correctly dont worry :icon_wink:no offense intended by this statement, but you didn't read my post correctly. I said "nobled or ignored" the main idea behind that was they don't have anything to do with us anymore. By leaving it doesn't declare war neither does it affirm peaceful relations with each other.
If we made a statement pertaining to us having alliance or nap that still wouldn't qualify the relationship as a family. Had we agreed they are still part of our tribe even though they weren't accepted into it, then they would qualify as a family.
Bored! had made such a declaration by deny it as untruthful/allowing it on the map regarding Nubs. I'm only bring it up to show the difference, I did not bring up all the qualifiers for making a family was...lazy
And hence ^^^ that little quotey of mine still stands true :icon_wink:Okay then I should be expecting to see those ex-motion now in FRST nobling whats left of motion or else your point is a moo point to use the immortal words of joey :icon_biggrin:
Now if this were to happen then it would beg the question...are motion, because they have standing diplomacy, just a non-public branch of FRST :icon_neutral:
then that leaves the inactives and/or less quality players still surrounding the new FRST recruits.
At least if you are gonna write another post with a decent bit of writing split it up a bit, walls hurt my eyes (yes I have to wear glasses, never wear em though :lolI want to correct you so many times but it's getting long...
Just a map of FRST and MotionCould not open spoiler, so if it was pertinent information sorry.
I was never known in school for being good in english class and I dont know what an absolute is.....I even googled it but still didnt understand :icon_redface:1: you made several absolutes in order to make your points(absolutes are mostly wrong).
Ahh I knew you you would bring that up :icon_wink:2: You made the statement inactives/sucky players will not be ignored and that the only solution was"secret family". Ignoring the idea of Nap(could be), Alliance(could be), or non affiliated group(could be).
Yes the situation does have relevance in all decision making, I havent ignored that fact atall, thank you captain obvious. However you cannot simply ignore all the personal growth opportunities surrounding you to go long range with 100% of your troops. Everyone knows that effective peronal growth aswell as expanding with the tribe are very important aspects of tw, and to say that these new players would ignore surrounding inactives and/or noobs completely for none other than the sole purpose of nuking BORED! then I would very quickly question the that move.3: second part of 2, that statement also practically states " all noobs will be nobled all the time as well as inactives" that is simply not the case. You seem as if your purposy ignoring the fact situation has relevance in any decision making process. Wasting nukes on Motion instead of you(bored!) would be a poor decision.
You are exectly right in that when you say they are poor examples.4:question are you waring AAA,Ni, or Manic? or all nobody tribes If you aren't are you allies/families? This could be a poor example(since this is almost in endgame/total war) however the point is simply because you aren't fighting someone, doesn't mean your Allies/families/naps.
No thats not what I said atall. I honestly dont understand where you got that from. If you can point out where I even impled this then ill more than happily discuss this point with you.5: if your angle is that Motion having former members in frst=auto friendship. Then I'd like to cite the case of wolf(something, a former leader of apoc) joing Bored! and then getting quickly devoured by Apoc.
Making a 6th point for the sake of having 6 points could be construed as you needing to write more to make yourself sure of your argument. Im not saying thats how I see things, but just letting you know thats how some onlookers might view it :icon_twisted:6: I simply wanted a six..
Let me just quote something from the post you have just replied to.but really your statement of only one end result in a situation, really reeks of someone being narrow minded or someone purposely trying to construe information in a deceitful manner.In this case I'd believe the latter.
So no I don't believe that statement hold true(your original post), I do believe the time will tell statement. I'm just trying to show you/others, the information you presented was closed minded or intentionally construing an incorrect view.
Once again I don't mean to offend If I did, I dislike flaming in it's entirety.If it sounds like such, I apologize.