DeletedUser
Guest
My eyes were suffering from trying to use quotes for your posts. turns out I need them to avoid confusion, like what occurred.I be dyslexic :icon_razz: so different cause for crappy eye's...sorta.At least if you are gonna write another post with a decent bit of writing split it up a bit, walls hurt my eyes (yes I have to wear glasses, never wear em though :lol![]()
Absolute=Expressing finality with no implication of possible change;I was never known in school for being good in english class and I dont know what an absolute is.....I even googled it but still didnt understand :icon_redface:
I'm one to believe most statements with such finality are false.
My final post was regarding this statement not your entire argument, sorry for the misunderstanding.Now like I said if they are to be nobled then they cant be considered a family obviously, but if they are to be ignored like you said they may be then there could only be one possible reason for that... there is diplomacy between remnants of motion and FRST because these new FRST recruits wont sit there and not noble inactives and/or less quality players surrounding them for no other reason than current standing diplomacy.
[FONT="]this statement only seems to enforce my belief in this qoute “intentionally construing an incorrect view.”."If you noble them then there is no question of them being a family, thats clear. However on the other hand"
Unfortunately for your whole last paragraph it is now null and void due to me obviously not being narrowminded as I presented more than 1 outcome. Nice try though
Why becuase you yourslef realize that the nature of your phrasing is questionable by most forum goers and would imply family even when you truly don't believe such an idea as the only concept. [/FONT]
I showed you the qoute that segment was attacking, so no it's not void, unless you can find another statement that say however without having much to do to change the idea.
I honeslty couldn't understand that statement with however, Please explain.
[FONT="]this statement only seems to enforce my belief in this qoute “intentionally construing an incorrect view.”."Non-public branch" is another important part of my post because as you see I clearly say branch and not family. Now people will come in here and say branch and family and academy etc etc are all the same and I would tend to agree for the most part, however this situation of merging in the top players and then keeping diplomacy with the remains doesnt necessarily imply family, but it also doesn't constitute the normal NAP status with another tribe as it would then be fairly obvious that they are your minions ready to be recruited should anymore of the remains impress atall.
Why becuase you yourslef realize that the nature of your phrasing is questionable by most forum goers and would imply family even when you truly don't believe such an idea as the only concept.
[/FONT]
[FONT="]
[/FONT]
[FONT="]That was the exact point I was trying to make. I realize your saying just a few lines down they aren’t in danger of enoblement by bored! However they could be used in the war effort. Wasting nukes on other targets, is unwise full commitment in war is what wins wars. You understand that, clearly by your comment regarding AAA. The other ones were eh but that was a good example because the only reason you can dismiss it was the point I was arguingAAA - Completely impractical for our southern players to expand through them as they are currently fighting against FRST and WMD.
[/FONT]
Call it a preemptive strike, if you weren’t going to make such a point then I wont.I honestly dont understand where you got that from. If you can point out where I even impled this then ill more than happily discuss this point with you.
Missed this the first time through so my argument with AAA is questionable now since this sets up a different idea. I became captain obviously purely because you seemed to ignore such a possibility. Simply because it can happen doesn't mean it will happen. What if we do ignore it? that is all I was trying to make clear, your statement hereYes the situation does have relevance in all decision making, I havent ignored that fact atall, thank you captain obvious. However you cannot simply ignore all the personal growth opportunities surrounding you to go long range with 100% of your troops. Everyone knows that effective peronal growth aswell as expanding with the tribe are very important aspects of tw, and to say that these new players would ignore surrounding inactives and/or noobs completely for none other than the sole purpose of nuking BORED! then I would very quickly question the that move.
was to certain. I brought this up twice but I believe it important.then there could only be one possible reason for that..
Anyway the captain obvious comment hurt:icon_sad:
Oh and I wanted a sixth comment because I'm odd.. I prefer certain numbers(and already made them counted bullet points..). I'll list them 1,3,6,9,11,13,16,19,21,23,29,31,36,37,39,41,43,44,49,51,55,56,59,61,64...stoping now. Point is I dislike 5 and wanted 6 even though Its not really high on my favorites list.....
Last edited by a moderator: