*Weekly* 'The World' vs 'The Alliance' Stats

Discussion in 'World 2' started by MrTTom, Jul 5, 2009.

Share This Page

  1. MrTTom

    MrTTom Guest

    Well here it goes....

    I'll be updating this thread every week about how TW is coping against Aten, HOT, MPX-E, DbT & EleAud (Diman claims they are at war with TW but not on a weekly or even monthly basis I believe :icon_neutral:).

    So without further ado, here are the stats for 05/07/09.

    TW vs 'The World':

    Side 1:
    Tribes: TW TW1 TW3 TW4 TW5
    Players:

    Side 2:
    Tribes: Aten|E AtenCS AtenRX AtenRa EleAud DbT HOT MPX-E
    Players:

    Timeframe: Last week

    Total conquers against opposite side:

    Side 1: 521
    Side 2: 660
    Difference: 139

    [​IMG]

    Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

    Side 1: 5,364,232
    Side 2: 6,818,660
    Difference: 1,454,428

    [​IMG]

    TW vs Aten Family:

    Side 1:
    Tribes: TW TW1 TW3 TW4 TW5
    Players:

    Side 2:
    Tribes: Aten|E AtenCS AtenRX AtenRa
    Players:

    Timeframe: Last week

    Total conquers against opposite side:

    Side 1: 119
    Side 2: 226
    Difference: 107

    [​IMG]

    Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

    Side 1: 1,242,975
    Side 2: 2,270,189
    Difference: 1,027,214

    [​IMG]

    TW vs HOT:

    Side 1:
    Tribes: TW TW1 TW3 TW4 TW5
    Players:

    Side 2:
    Tribes: HOT
    Players:

    Timeframe: Last week

    Total conquers against opposite side:

    Side 1: 134
    Side 2: 115
    Difference: 19

    [​IMG]

    Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

    Side 1: 1,347,874
    Side 2: 1,250,870
    Difference: 97,004

    [​IMG]
    TW vs MPX-E:

    Side 1:
    Tribes: TW TW1 TW3 TW4 TW5
    Players:

    Side 2:
    Tribes: MPX-E
    Players:

    Timeframe: Last week

    Total conquers against opposite side:

    Side 1: 247
    Side 2: 194
    Difference: 53

    [​IMG]

    Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

    Side 1: 2,559,730
    Side 2: 2,047,172
    Difference: 512,558

    [​IMG]

    TW vs EleAud:
    Side 1:
    Tribes: TW TW1 TW3 TW4 TW5
    Players:

    Side 2:
    Tribes: EleAud
    Players:

    Timeframe: Last week

    Total conquers against opposite side:

    Side 1: 13
    Side 2: 118
    Difference: 105

    [​IMG]

    Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

    Side 1: 132,151
    Side 2: 1,181,168
    Difference: 1,049,017

    [​IMG]

    TW vs DbT:


    Side 1:
    Tribes: TW TW1 TW3 TW4 TW5
    Players:

    Side 2:
    Tribes: DbT
    Players:

    Timeframe: Last week

    Total conquers against opposite side:

    Side 1: 8
    Side 2: 7
    Difference: 1

    [​IMG]

    Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

    Side 1: 81,502
    Side 2: 69,261
    Difference: 12,241

    [​IMG]

    Overall statistics:

    - 'The World' or 'Allaince' is in the lead against TW
    - Aten and EleAud are currently taking more enemy caps than losing their own
    - TW is currently winning against HOT, MPX-E & DbT.
    - Strangely enough, DbT is staying quiet for now with hardly any noblings against TW - possible Cease Fire?

    Tune in to next week's statistics for World Two's 'World War'. :icon_cool:
     
  2. dark_griever

    dark_griever Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2007
    Messages:
    34
    Likes Received:
    0
    TW is winning against MPX because they've been kicking players left and right for losing villages. If you add in renu, outlands, geodezist, and cozmin123 (I think EleAud benefits the most from cozmin, but still), the stats look a lot worse for TW.
     
  3. Seonghong

    Seonghong Non-stop Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    154
    Likes Received:
    0
    interesting stats
     
  4. Congo

    Congo Guest

    Yes!! Go TW!!!

    I told you we were going to win.
     
  5. Marlowdude

    Marlowdude Guest

    Well not really they just kick people who lose villages so TW are really losing a lot more then those stats say and dont forget about players deleting on TW side such as Stev (cant remember his name completely)

    Really TW are getting their asses kicked now.
     
  6. koybaby

    koybaby Active Member

    Joined:
    May 21, 2009
    Messages:
    33
    Likes Received:
    0
    Well, i think we know which tribe is doing the best :p Go on the sheep! :D
     
  7. Seonghong

    Seonghong Non-stop Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    154
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think ive included all the players kicked here to get a more complete picture


    Side 1:
    Tribes: MPX-E EleAud Aten-X Aten|E AtenCS AtenRa AtenRX DbT HOT
    Players:

    Side 2:
    Tribes: TW TW1 TW3 TW4 TW5
    Players: dragonowl geodezist renu outlands

    Timeframe: Last week

    Total conquers:

    Side 1: 2,272
    Side 2: 1,864
    Difference: 408

    [​IMG]

    Total conquers against opposite side:

    Side 1: 763
    Side 2: 514
    Difference: 249

    [​IMG]

    Points value of total conquers:

    Side 1: 23,413,934
    Side 2: 19,225,996
    Difference: 4,187,938

    [​IMG]

    Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

    Side 1: 7,876,062
    Side 2: 5,293,108
    Difference: 2,582,954

    [​IMG]
     
  8. Seonghong

    Seonghong Non-stop Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    154
    Likes Received:
    0
    Aten Vs TW

    Side 1:
    Tribes: Aten-X Aten|E AtenCS AtenRa AtenRX
    Players:

    Side 2:
    Tribes: TW TW1 TW3 TW4 TW5
    Players: dragonowl geodezist renu outlands

    Timeframe: Last week

    Total conquers:

    Side 1: 1,020
    Side 2: 1,864
    Difference: 844

    [​IMG]

    Total conquers against opposite side:

    Side 1: 243
    Side 2: 119
    Difference: 124

    [​IMG]

    Points value of total conquers:

    Side 1: 10,433,312
    Side 2: 19,225,996
    Difference: 8,792,684

    [​IMG]

    Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

    Side 1: 2,453,089
    Side 2: 1,242,975
    Difference: 1,210,114

    [​IMG]
     
  9. Seonghong

    Seonghong Non-stop Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    154
    Likes Received:
    0
    HOT Vs TW

    Side 1:
    Tribes: HOT
    Players:

    Side 2:
    Tribes: TW TW1 TW3 TW4 TW5
    Players: dragonowl geodezist renu outlands

    Timeframe: Last week

    Total conquers:

    Side 1: 440
    Side 2: 1,863
    Difference: 1,423

    [​IMG]

    Total conquers against opposite side:

    Side 1: 169
    Side 2: 130
    Difference: 39

    [​IMG]

    Points value of total conquers:

    Side 1: 4,676,682
    Side 2: 19,217,746
    Difference: 14,541,064

    [​IMG]

    Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

    Side 1: 1,810,377
    Side 2: 1,307,389
    Difference: 502,988

    [​IMG]
     
  10. Seonghong

    Seonghong Non-stop Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    154
    Likes Received:
    0
    EleAud Vs TW

    Side 1:
    Tribes: EleAud
    Players:

    Side 2:
    Tribes: TW TW1 TW3 TW4 TW5
    Players: dragonowl geodezist renu outlands

    Timeframe: Last week

    Total conquers:

    Side 1: 324
    Side 2: 1,863
    Difference: 1,539

    [​IMG]

    Total conquers against opposite side:

    Side 1: 116
    Side 2: 13
    Difference: 103

    [​IMG]

    Points value of total conquers:

    Side 1: 3,278,925
    Side 2: 19,217,746
    Difference: 15,938,821

    [​IMG]

    Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

    Side 1: 1,160,842
    Side 2: 132,151
    Difference: 1,028,691

    [​IMG]
     
  11. Seonghong

    Seonghong Non-stop Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    154
    Likes Received:
    0
    MPX-E Vs TW

    Side 1:
    Tribes: MPX-E
    Players:

    Side 2:
    Tribes: TW TW1 TW3 TW4 TW5
    Players: dragonowl geodezist renu outlands

    Timeframe: Last week

    Total conquers:

    Side 1: 445
    Side 2: 1,863
    Difference: 1,418

    [​IMG]

    Total conquers against opposite side:

    Side 1: 227
    Side 2: 245
    Difference: 18

    [​IMG]

    Points value of total conquers:

    Side 1: 4,600,283
    Side 2: 19,217,746
    Difference: 14,617,463

    [​IMG]

    Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

    Side 1: 2,372,079
    Side 2: 2,540,146
    Difference: 168,067

    [​IMG]
     
  12. Seonghong

    Seonghong Non-stop Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    154
    Likes Received:
    0
    Dbt Vs TW

    Side 1:
    Tribes: DbT
    Players:

    Side 2:
    Tribes: TW TW1 TW3 TW4 TW5
    Players: dragonowl geodezist renu outlands

    Timeframe: Last week

    Total conquers:

    Side 1: 43
    Side 2: 1,863
    Difference: 1,820

    [​IMG]

    Total conquers against opposite side:

    Side 1: 8
    Side 2: 7
    Difference: 1

    [​IMG]

    Points value of total conquers:

    Side 1: 424,732
    Side 2: 19,217,746
    Difference: 18,793,014

    [​IMG]

    Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

    Side 1: 79,675
    Side 2: 70,447
    Difference: 9,228

    [​IMG]
     
  13. Ripfin

    Ripfin Part of the Furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2007
    Messages:
    6,021
    Likes Received:
    6
    All these stats tell me is that TW would rather noble Barbs and Abandoneds then to noble the enemy :icon_razz:
     
  14. urk4ever

    urk4ever Guest

    What else can they do?
    At this rate TW won't have any players left at the end of the year if everyone deletes.
     
  15. dreid

    dreid Guest

    You can bang on all you like about why we are booting accounts. The fact is we have been restructuring for a while. You'll notice we have compressed and (almost) got rid of TW4. We are still compressing and we are kicking sat and inactive accounts.

    Outlands had lost about a dozen villages to MPX, and all of them after he'd left his account. All of these losses were over a week ago and do not affect these stats. We allowed the account to stay int TW while we tried to tempt him to return.

    If the mighty MPX needs to start with the excuses already they are in for a long ride. Maybe you can be their saviour Ripfin?

    We will continue kicking inactive accounts, and you can bitch and moan all you like.
     
  16. dark_griever

    dark_griever Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2007
    Messages:
    34
    Likes Received:
    0
    Dreid, you're way overreacting. We are merely adding these accounts in order to make the war stats accurate. It's obvious that if we hadn't been bothering with taking villages from the players who were kicked, we might have had greater successes against the players who are still with TW. If we had actually wanted excuses to explain these stats, we could have just mentioned snjaa.
     
  17. jas24zzk

    jas24zzk Guest

    How about, just doing the village graph the way it is.

    Then do a total points change, rather than points by conquer. That way NO-ONE can hide from booting inactives etc.

    :)
     
  18. Rawkling

    Rawkling Guest

    You guys are winning for once against TW, is that not enough for you? So instead you start complaining about TW booting inactives and why TW players are quitting?

    If you guys are upset that TW players are quitting and deleting, then deal with it instead of spamming MrTToms thread. MrTTom spent his own time and effort making this thread to inform everybody about stats and I don't think he likes people spamming it.
     
  19. DarkeAngel

    DarkeAngel Guest

    You only explained one person there, what about the others? Also, didn't TW make the same argument awhile back when players they were attacking were kicked? Funny how it's a legitimate argument when TW makes it but only an excuse when others do.

    Also, I know geo was active when I was attacking him. He sent mails and I also have a report of him removing me from his buddy list, which means he wasn't being sat.

    Either way you try and argue it it seems to be rather close war, stat wise. Enjoy.
     
  20. dreid

    dreid Guest

    But the war stats are not accurate. If you want to remove snjaa from your tribe then you go for it, but playing around with stats to make you look better is just desperate.

    Whatever floats your boat dark :)