*Weekly* 'The World' vs 'The Alliance' Stats

DeletedUser

Guest
Well here it goes....

I'll be updating this thread every week about how TW is coping against Aten, HOT, MPX-E, DbT & EleAud (Diman claims they are at war with TW but not on a weekly or even monthly basis I believe :icon_neutral:).

So without further ado, here are the stats for 05/07/09.

TW vs 'The World':

Side 1:
Tribes: TW TW1 TW3 TW4 TW5
Players:

Side 2:
Tribes: Aten|E AtenCS AtenRX AtenRa EleAud DbT HOT MPX-E
Players:

Timeframe: Last week

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 521
Side 2: 660
Difference: 139

image.php


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 5,364,232
Side 2: 6,818,660
Difference: 1,454,428

image.php


TW vs Aten Family:

Side 1:
Tribes: TW TW1 TW3 TW4 TW5
Players:

Side 2:
Tribes: Aten|E AtenCS AtenRX AtenRa
Players:

Timeframe: Last week

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 119
Side 2: 226
Difference: 107

image.php


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 1,242,975
Side 2: 2,270,189
Difference: 1,027,214

image.php


TW vs HOT:

Side 1:
Tribes: TW TW1 TW3 TW4 TW5
Players:

Side 2:
Tribes: HOT
Players:

Timeframe: Last week

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 134
Side 2: 115
Difference: 19

image.php


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 1,347,874
Side 2: 1,250,870
Difference: 97,004

image.php

TW vs MPX-E:

Side 1:
Tribes: TW TW1 TW3 TW4 TW5
Players:

Side 2:
Tribes: MPX-E
Players:

Timeframe: Last week

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 247
Side 2: 194
Difference: 53

image.php


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 2,559,730
Side 2: 2,047,172
Difference: 512,558

image.php


TW vs EleAud:
Side 1:
Tribes: TW TW1 TW3 TW4 TW5
Players:

Side 2:
Tribes: EleAud
Players:

Timeframe: Last week

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 13
Side 2: 118
Difference: 105

image.php


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 132,151
Side 2: 1,181,168
Difference: 1,049,017

image.php


TW vs DbT:


Side 1:
Tribes: TW TW1 TW3 TW4 TW5
Players:

Side 2:
Tribes: DbT
Players:

Timeframe: Last week

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 8
Side 2: 7
Difference: 1

image.php


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 81,502
Side 2: 69,261
Difference: 12,241

image.php


Overall statistics:

- 'The World' or 'Allaince' is in the lead against TW
- Aten and EleAud are currently taking more enemy caps than losing their own
- TW is currently winning against HOT, MPX-E & DbT.
- Strangely enough, DbT is staying quiet for now with hardly any noblings against TW - possible Cease Fire?

Tune in to next week's statistics for World Two's 'World War'. :icon_cool:
 

dark_griever

Guest
TW is winning against MPX because they've been kicking players left and right for losing villages. If you add in renu, outlands, geodezist, and cozmin123 (I think EleAud benefits the most from cozmin, but still), the stats look a lot worse for TW.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Well not really they just kick people who lose villages so TW are really losing a lot more then those stats say and dont forget about players deleting on TW side such as Stev (cant remember his name completely)

Really TW are getting their asses kicked now.
 

koybaby

Guest
Well, i think we know which tribe is doing the best :p Go on the sheep! :D
 

DeletedUser18663

Guest
I think ive included all the players kicked here to get a more complete picture


Side 1:
Tribes: MPX-E EleAud Aten-X Aten|E AtenCS AtenRa AtenRX DbT HOT
Players:

Side 2:
Tribes: TW TW1 TW3 TW4 TW5
Players: dragonowl geodezist renu outlands

Timeframe: Last week

Total conquers:

Side 1: 2,272
Side 2: 1,864
Difference: 408

image.php


Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 763
Side 2: 514
Difference: 249

image.php


Points value of total conquers:

Side 1: 23,413,934
Side 2: 19,225,996
Difference: 4,187,938

image.php


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 7,876,062
Side 2: 5,293,108
Difference: 2,582,954

image.php
 

DeletedUser18663

Guest
Aten Vs TW

Side 1:
Tribes: Aten-X Aten|E AtenCS AtenRa AtenRX
Players:

Side 2:
Tribes: TW TW1 TW3 TW4 TW5
Players: dragonowl geodezist renu outlands

Timeframe: Last week

Total conquers:

Side 1: 1,020
Side 2: 1,864
Difference: 844

image.php


Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 243
Side 2: 119
Difference: 124

image.php


Points value of total conquers:

Side 1: 10,433,312
Side 2: 19,225,996
Difference: 8,792,684

image.php


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 2,453,089
Side 2: 1,242,975
Difference: 1,210,114

image.php
 

DeletedUser18663

Guest
HOT Vs TW

Side 1:
Tribes: HOT
Players:

Side 2:
Tribes: TW TW1 TW3 TW4 TW5
Players: dragonowl geodezist renu outlands

Timeframe: Last week

Total conquers:

Side 1: 440
Side 2: 1,863
Difference: 1,423

image.php


Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 169
Side 2: 130
Difference: 39

image.php


Points value of total conquers:

Side 1: 4,676,682
Side 2: 19,217,746
Difference: 14,541,064

image.php


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 1,810,377
Side 2: 1,307,389
Difference: 502,988

image.php
 

DeletedUser18663

Guest
EleAud Vs TW

Side 1:
Tribes: EleAud
Players:

Side 2:
Tribes: TW TW1 TW3 TW4 TW5
Players: dragonowl geodezist renu outlands

Timeframe: Last week

Total conquers:

Side 1: 324
Side 2: 1,863
Difference: 1,539

image.php


Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 116
Side 2: 13
Difference: 103

image.php


Points value of total conquers:

Side 1: 3,278,925
Side 2: 19,217,746
Difference: 15,938,821

image.php


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 1,160,842
Side 2: 132,151
Difference: 1,028,691

image.php
 

DeletedUser18663

Guest
MPX-E Vs TW

Side 1:
Tribes: MPX-E
Players:

Side 2:
Tribes: TW TW1 TW3 TW4 TW5
Players: dragonowl geodezist renu outlands

Timeframe: Last week

Total conquers:

Side 1: 445
Side 2: 1,863
Difference: 1,418

image.php


Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 227
Side 2: 245
Difference: 18

image.php


Points value of total conquers:

Side 1: 4,600,283
Side 2: 19,217,746
Difference: 14,617,463

image.php


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 2,372,079
Side 2: 2,540,146
Difference: 168,067

image.php
 

DeletedUser18663

Guest
Dbt Vs TW

Side 1:
Tribes: DbT
Players:

Side 2:
Tribes: TW TW1 TW3 TW4 TW5
Players: dragonowl geodezist renu outlands

Timeframe: Last week

Total conquers:

Side 1: 43
Side 2: 1,863
Difference: 1,820

image.php


Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 8
Side 2: 7
Difference: 1

image.php


Points value of total conquers:

Side 1: 424,732
Side 2: 19,217,746
Difference: 18,793,014

image.php


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 79,675
Side 2: 70,447
Difference: 9,228

image.php
 

Ripfin

Guest
All these stats tell me is that TW would rather noble Barbs and Abandoneds then to noble the enemy :icon_razz:
 

DeletedUser

Guest
What else can they do?
At this rate TW won't have any players left at the end of the year if everyone deletes.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
You can bang on all you like about why we are booting accounts. The fact is we have been restructuring for a while. You'll notice we have compressed and (almost) got rid of TW4. We are still compressing and we are kicking sat and inactive accounts.

Outlands had lost about a dozen villages to MPX, and all of them after he'd left his account. All of these losses were over a week ago and do not affect these stats. We allowed the account to stay int TW while we tried to tempt him to return.

If the mighty MPX needs to start with the excuses already they are in for a long ride. Maybe you can be their saviour Ripfin?

We will continue kicking inactive accounts, and you can bitch and moan all you like.
 

dark_griever

Guest
Dreid, you're way overreacting. We are merely adding these accounts in order to make the war stats accurate. It's obvious that if we hadn't been bothering with taking villages from the players who were kicked, we might have had greater successes against the players who are still with TW. If we had actually wanted excuses to explain these stats, we could have just mentioned snjaa.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
How about, just doing the village graph the way it is.

Then do a total points change, rather than points by conquer. That way NO-ONE can hide from booting inactives etc.

:)
 

DeletedUser

Guest
You guys are winning for once against TW, is that not enough for you? So instead you start complaining about TW booting inactives and why TW players are quitting?

If you guys are upset that TW players are quitting and deleting, then deal with it instead of spamming MrTToms thread. MrTTom spent his own time and effort making this thread to inform everybody about stats and I don't think he likes people spamming it.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
You can bang on all you like about why we are booting accounts. The fact is we have been restructuring for a while. You'll notice we have compressed and (almost) got rid of TW4. We are still compressing and we are kicking sat and inactive accounts.

Outlands had lost about a dozen villages to MPX, and all of them after he'd left his account. All of these losses were over a week ago and do not affect these stats. We allowed the account to stay int TW while we tried to tempt him to return.

If the mighty MPX needs to start with the excuses already they are in for a long ride. Maybe you can be their saviour Ripfin?

We will continue kicking inactive accounts, and you can bitch and moan all you like.

You only explained one person there, what about the others? Also, didn't TW make the same argument awhile back when players they were attacking were kicked? Funny how it's a legitimate argument when TW makes it but only an excuse when others do.

Also, I know geo was active when I was attacking him. He sent mails and I also have a report of him removing me from his buddy list, which means he wasn't being sat.

Either way you try and argue it it seems to be rather close war, stat wise. Enjoy.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Dreid, you're way overreacting. We are merely adding these accounts in order to make the war stats accurate. It's obvious that if we hadn't been bothering with taking villages from the players who were kicked, we might have had greater successes against the players who are still with TW. If we had actually wanted excuses to explain these stats, we could have just mentioned snjaa.

But the war stats are not accurate. If you want to remove snjaa from your tribe then you go for it, but playing around with stats to make you look better is just desperate.

Whatever floats your boat dark :)
 
Top