DeletedUser
Guest
I can kind of get what your saying, but I probably wont be able to give you a decent answer until you word it better in the morning .
but for now; your not going to like it, but it simply happened due to evoloution. The whole point in evolution is that if things weren't so complicated then what you see around you wouldnt exist. The very fact that somthing so complicated can exist in essence means that it will carry on to exist reproduce, mutate, get more complicated. If that 2nd generation can exist, it will. If it competes (occupies the same niche) as the 1st generation, only the 1st or 2nd generation can exist. Hence why we dont have a long string of species descending back from us living today.
come to join the party :icon_biggrin:.
You (pretty much) write in the above quote that evolution is the process of simple organisms mutating, and becoming more complex, then the stronger one kills off the weaker one.
However for this to occur, new information has to be made. For instance, a rat mutates so it grows wings, it has to mutate. But where is the information for wings, to be mutated in the first place? Mutation does not create new information, just muddles up what's already there.
There has been no evidence of new information being created ever. Just a rearrangement/mutation of what was already there.
I probably wrote confusingly, so here's a site that might explain it better
http://creation.com/meta-information
Mutations already have the information for life, just not anything new.To Donovan, you say that how can simply matter and energy produce life yet you go on to say that mutations (which some might say is similar to creating new life) occurs due to matter and energy yeees?
Believing in Evolution also brings up some moral issues too. For example, what's wrong with rascism? White supremacists believe blacks are below them on the evolutionary scale, so why can't caucasians kill them off? It's just natural selection isn't it? The same would apply to endangered animals. Who cares about the dodo? it didnt have wings, so it couldn't fly away when we killed it off. It was weaker, so it's fine that we made it extinct, just natural selection right?
Same argument with global warming. So what if it kills off the other animals, We're the dominant species, isn't that what we are supposed to do?
Why should we help the africans? They're lower than us, why dont we just kill them off?
This is probably got a little over the top. oh well:icon_wink:
EDIT:
I thought it was a geneitc disease? Please point me out if I'm wrong.Did they not tell you at university that Down's syndrome isn't a genetic disease?
Last edited by a moderator: