You may very well be right - I think the point is that either they are all refugees or none of them are refugees. If the scientists are advocating that KDK are refugees therefore warranting their attacks then how can they on the same hand state that WWA were not. Its not a question of the definition of refugee. Its a question of character. One cannot move definitions around to suit ones own argument. The attacks on KDK are justified becasue they are refugees according to the scientists but WWA recruiting in our territory was legitimate? When we did not make a big deal of the WWA recruiting we believed we were dealing with an honourable leader. Lesson learnt there!I see what they are doing as completely 'fair play'.