:'( Why! Families Already

Status
Not open for further replies.

DeletedUser

Guest
muahahaha

yea I seem to be close to a lot of people, right where I like it!
 

DeletedUser

Guest
i must admit we are in a pretty good area seems we are all pact up tight and surrounded by noobs and some good players so theres close range fighting and fast farming all good =D
 

deadsocks

Guest
Family tribes are one thing, but academy tribes? The world has been open all of 2 days, how could they possibly tell who needs to prove they are worth their space in the tribe? Such is the function of an academy tribe as I see it...
 

carriestupidhead

Guest
Academies are for training and perhaps they are very new so they put them there straight off, idk lol
 

DeletedUser

Guest
i think its just to make the players in the main tribe feel better

and a "better" name for family tribe
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Name: Aten|X
Tag: Aten|X
Number of members: 1
Points of 40 best players: 83
Total points: 83
Average points: 83
Rank: 1106

nooo
 

DeletedUser

Guest
kebabe8 said:
To be honest family tribes are very under-rated and have alot of negative propaganda towards them. I agree, at this paticular stage family tribes are uncalled for and will most likely, 90% chance all be noobs. Personally, I don't believe in the use of family tribes, however, even if I did it would be too early to make 1.

The low tribe limit is bound to increase the amount of family tribes in the world. It would be more logical to have a squad of 40 good players who control 1 continent 1st before making an additional family tribe. Once this is done excess communication and careful co-ordination is required from both tribes with good leadership and average players.
Click to expand...

I want to add to what Kebabe8 said. If you think it takes 40 members to secure a competitive continent like K44 or K55. Then you must be dreaming. Not all of your 40 members will be active. Only about 15 - 25 will be active. The rest will be casual players or can't even speak english clearly enough to understand what the heck is going on...

You would need the top 40 best tribal war players of all time to secure a continent and have the greatest and best leader of all time to lead it.

my 2 cents......
 

DeletedUser

Guest
=SK= Raven said:
I want to add to what Kebabe8 said. If you think it takes 40 members to secure a competitive continent like K44 or K55. Then you must be dreaming. Not all of your 40 members will be active. Only about 15 - 25 will be active. The rest will be casual players or can't even speak english clearly enough to understand what the heck is going on...

You would need the top 40 best tribal war players of all time to secure a continent and have the greatest and best leader of all time to lead it.

my 2 cents......
Click to expand...


hey raven that was very well typed. I agree with you. If you think 40 members is enough to rule a continent your joking. Not all 40 are considered active members. only 15 - 20 are actually active.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
=SK= Raven said:
I want to add to what Kebabe8 said. If you think it takes 40 members to secure a competitive continent like K44 or K55. Then you must be dreaming. Not all of your 40 members will be active. Only about 15 - 25 will be active. The rest will be casual players or can't even speak english clearly enough to understand what the heck is going on...

You would need the top 40 best tribal war players of all time to secure a continent and have the greatest and best leader of all time to lead it.

my 2 cents......
Click to expand...
Ewww, so not true. :icon_neutral:
You should mention the time frame what you are thinking of, otherwise i'll do it for you.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
=SK= Raven said:
I want to add to what Kebabe8 said. If you think it takes 40 members to secure a competitive continent like K44 or K55. Then you must be dreaming. Not all of your 40 members will be active. Only about 15 - 25 will be active. The rest will be casual players or can't even speak english clearly enough to understand what the heck is going on...

You would need the top 40 best tribal war players of all time to secure a continent and have the greatest and best leader of all time to lead it.

my 2 cents......
Click to expand...

i have to agree with FT, 40 players is easily enough to secure a K, and if you have inactives in your tribe, why are in they in your tribe?
 

DeletedUser

Guest
=SK= Raven said:
I want to add to what Kebabe8 said. If you think it takes 40 members to secure a competitive continent like K44 or K55. Then you must be dreaming. Not all of your 40 members will be active. Only about 15 - 25 will be active. The rest will be casual players or can't even speak english clearly enough to understand what the heck is going on...

You would need the top 40 best tribal war players of all time to secure a continent and have the greatest and best leader of all time to lead it.

my 2 cents......
Click to expand...

why would 15-25 be inactive? if they are inactive they should be dismissed. Does that mean that 15-25 of your 40 players are inactive?
 

DeletedUser

Guest
dragoneye776 said:
why would 15-25 be inactive? if they are inactive they should be dismissed. Does that mean that 15-25 of your 40 players are inactive?
Click to expand...

Do you know how to read? Raven said that 15 - 25 players will be Active as in they will log on every 2-3 hours. But the rest of your members are just CASUAL players that means they log on only 2-3 times a day.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
24/7

Why?? Because we can only invite 40 members. If only we can invite more, then we will not form a family..

If you form a family consisting of more than 3 tribes.. then maybe its noobish at this early stage..

We are not a family nor an alliance with 24x7..
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top