DeletedUser
Guest
Well if you count ex members to then assiliant would be in that count wouldnt he ?
I only checked the THE page. I'm rampantly biased here as I'm sure you can tell. I believed Assailant has quit the game, so he is likely not in charge of his account, rendering us unable to measure him as a current or ex-THE player based on his rececnt performance; he is not there.
Long story short. You're wrong.
Oh my god. Not another BigBadSanta.
Assailant posted earlier in the thread, wishing us luck. Do you think he would do that if we had kicked him? He left because he had stuff going on in real life; Why don't you ask him yourself?
We at least have kept things civil. No need to be so bitter. Anyway, good luck to both sides. Though, obviously I hope INSO don't have too much luck :icon_wink:
Yeah, -Assailant- had control of the account when he posted his goodbye thread, and when he clicked "leave tribe". You assume that he stuck around after leaving or set a sitter. When in reality, he decided to leave because of RL reasons, and so that's what he did. He isn't playing the account, he isn't defending against INSO, and he isn't requesting support.If a player didnt get booted he left. For him to leave then he or a sitter would have to have control of his account. I highly doubt you allow external sitters and since hes on such good terms with THE then he isnt going to be sat externally if it was a sitter.
So someone was controlling the account. In which case his account was active and he should be classed as THE. But hey what would i know.
Oxford (423|381) K34 4,278 domd123 yavoth [THE] 23rd Feb 2009 - 05:03:20
INSO 2 None 23rd February 2009 - 07:00:01 75
Yeah, -Assailant- had control of the account when he posted his goodbye thread, and when he clicked "leave tribe". You assume that he stuck around after leaving or set a sitter. When in reality, he decided to leave because of RL reasons, and so that's what he did. He isn't playing the account, he isn't defending against INSO, and he isn't requesting support.
hehe iceman you know it will come, im looking forward to it aswell
Why would we keep an account in our tribe if there was nobody playing it? He didn't set a sitter. He's been planning on leaving for a little while now
You would have kept him and internally nobled him as most tribes do. But i dont know maybe THE doesnt do that. Oh wait yes they do, thats where all spleens caps come from.
Aaaaactually, it depends on the circumstances. -Assailant- left as part of his retirement. It had nothing to do with THE dismissing him or asking him to leave. On the other hand, we booted Orlangyrrr and are still capping him out. And, on the third hand - suspend your disbelief - we have Stolendestiny and soulcube, who we kept in-tribe while they were nobled out.
So, the bottom line is...We don't have a set policy on it, we just kind of do what we feel we need to in every situation. Please don't try to over-simplify it.
ThePostBeforeYours! said:Aaaaactually, it depends on the circumstances.
You would have kept him and internally nobled him as most tribes do. But i dont know maybe THE doesnt do that. Oh wait yes they do, thats where all spleens caps come from.
Look BBS, we keep spleen in because we feel sorry for him, okay we are nice like that in the, apart from noone will tell me who paddy is!!
paddy was a noob on w8, that progressed solely by in-tribe nobling of others (sometimes before they left)
:icon_razz:
Whatever it is, I'm not interested. Find another player to stalk; I don't want to be part of your weird obsession.