Very interesting, hope to see more maps & reports next article
Thank you for the compliments. As far as the content of your post - Which part was not accurate? The timeline with Jager was basic, and stated to be events as I know them - I don't think the events are different, rather it's probable more information ( that i did not get into for reasons of it being from one source) surrounding the events would be volunteered?
It is quite easy to call it a tale of fiction without supplying any proof. Can Invict provide proof that they should be looked at as an honest and upstanding tribe? I think the readers would enjoy listening! I am not convinced but am willing to change position if the evidence suggests it!
I have proof, the diplomacy we have with them is actually a decent one. They reacted when one of their members went rogue and attacked. I respect any tribe that is willing to react in respect to diplomatic relations. Since then we have not had one issue. I will say that you did try and invoke me to go to war with invict. I chose not to because I know the players of Jager and they were rimmed by just one person on 79. The reason I know this is the player is in my tribe: http://www.twstats.com/en79/index.php?page=player&mode=conquers&id=320950&type=all&oldtribe=10&pn=-1
Nice Try in trying to provoke a war though UBM to get yourself something to write.
per my blogI obviously have some of it by word of mouth and other information i have received by seeing it with my own eyes. Could it be misinformation for the whole tribe in case of possible leaks? Possibly...
you also failed to collect information from out side of things... totally siding with Jager and attempting to get Gents to launch on us also...
you're a parasite
Would like to see a top 20 or 25 tribes done by you UBM