Tribal Wars Team
- Reaction score
I dont see why invict cant just post some proof of their own if they care so much what people think by reading UBM's blog.
What "proof" are you looking for? Check twstats, Jager hit and nobled us first.I dont see why invict cant just post some proof of their own if they care so much what people think by reading UBM's blog.
That wasn't really a blog it was more of an agenda against INVICT (Im not a fan of them either).
Very one sided, the only positive reviews I see are coming from the REGIME tribe and mods/mod fanboys.
Its all good, you can always try again next time
Thank you for your post. I appreciate you taking the time and sharing your opinion in a sensible matter. I chose to release this as an article because that's the way i'd like to handle the blog rather than one big episode each time. I thought bringing in SnowFangz from Invict to answer some questions would keep it versatile as an article. He answered the questions in a very professional fashion. I do however thank you for your opinion.The very least it did was bring some life into the forums. So thank you UBM.
Been playing awhile now and used to just read and not actually have an account on these forums. Opinions are opinions, man up and take some time to write your own opinion (or propaganda). It is a strategy just as much to use the externals as it is another player inside of a tribe to cause issues. (Which I am going to say that I don't care which this is, it's a good read and done well, wetter it be truth or lie.)
If you are marking half the world under nap just so your members know what is arround them, which is dumb in my opinion if it is so that nobody attacks such players until you finish your business elsewhere that is smart.
Smart if it is a waiting list like others have stated.
Also a side note: UBM you should have just posted this as its own invictus thread instead of inside of your UBM blog. But that is just one persons opinion and I do enjoy reading something new on the forums.
Thank you, I think?Yes, rank 1 will make headlines first, but it isn't a bloggers job to trash them. It is there job to get the story out and from both sides, which he did, but he goes on, like i said before, to trash them.
Hey remember that time you were wrong about the blog having anything to do with Regime?We're not? Might as well make it Regime's blog now shall we.
Hey remember that time you barely had a match lit and claimed you were roasting some kids on the forums?You kiddin'? I'm having a blast roasting some kids on the forums
I really don't want this entire post to be all about you ... but you've made it pretty clear you want to come get vocal. I appreciate it, I appreciate the liveliness, I like that you have an opinon. What i don't appreciate is how you want to keep saying one thing over and over without actually supporting the opinion. Will i write things that people will disagree with sure, will they fuss over them, sometimes. Will every article be like that, I hope not, but if you are going to come out and get loud on the forums, come correct. Make it less about me and more about what was written. Same offer applies as earlier, or like Earl suggested, put your own pieces together! I'd read them.Cool, I'm not handing him an infarction because he discussed an one sided blog, like i will now for making a double post, nor will I ban him from ever doing it again. If you refer to my previous posts I said maybe next time, meaning I'm looking forward in reading your next thread but lets hope its not as shit as this one. (shit wasn't used in an offensive way here Earl pl0x no yellow cards)
And, this is a discussion thread amirite? So i havve the right of feedback whether it was positive or negative. (I liked the first post more, nobody gave me shit about liking it)
Fair response except the part where you word slander. I'm still waiting to point out what in the blog that was said that is trashing Invict unfairly.It's hard to defend my tribe when your opinion is so Biased UBM...
After all that is all your blog is, opinions... It's all slander against us and totally one sided!
The world will go on, and ultimately I feel sorry for those that entertain these notions.
We as a tribe are solid, and are a trust worthy group, with a tribe of 80+ members do you not think there would have been outrage that we broke our word? Of course there would have been! It was infact Jager that broke the NAP not us.
The point of the NAP isn't a permanent agreement and they do come to an end. so long as we break out NAPS within the terms agreed prior to it being conceived then there shouldn't be any reason for people to be having a tizzy.
Here is the TW stats.What "proof" are you looking for? Check twstats, Jager hit and nobled us first.
As for the issue with Gents, the member infracting the NAP has been dealt with.
So what else do you want?
When Kate was nobled, did INVICT talk to Jager about it--just curious? Did Jager approve that noble?Okay, as i am sure everyone is aware by now, we can ignore Kate being nobled, as that village was gifted to Gavin. So we got one noble after being hit before they fully went in to attacking, taking 6 villages before we could react. Notice before we could react. They had prepared for this, obviously.
P.S you never told me what proof you would like