DeletedUser
Guest
Maan... he really doesn't like not being able to voice on the forum.
But to WHOM is he crying? TO WHOM?!?!?!?
Actually, it's not really humorous. It's a pretty lame attempt at humor. Hence, my "sad" option. It's obvious that SN believes this is funny on some level -- but it's not. And I don't mean that in any kind of a "It's-not-funny-because-I-can't-take-a-joke" sorta' way.
I mean it's not funny on any sort of comedic level... except for a child maybe. I'll give you that. If you're talking comedy like fart noises and mom jokes... then this would fall into that category. It demonstrates an immature development of humor.
But, more importantly, it demonstrates an unhealthy need to be the center of attention and to have people talking about him. This, of course, is related to my earlier assessment of SN -- that he has a bit of a persecution complex. These are narcissistic tendencies... whether you believe everyone is out to get you -- OR -- whether you want everyone to stop what they're doing and "LOOK AT ME! LOOK AT ME! I'M BEING FUNNY! LOOK AT ME!"
Again, this is why I offered "sad" as one option.
It doesn't take a lot of time, but it does take time. Baffling!
While I have enjoyed some of your debating on the forums in the past. I think you are far off the mark and frankly acting the fool yourself.
Exactly what moral high ground or societal rung do you stand upon where you dictate what is or is not funny, what is or is not acceptable behavior, what is healthy or unhealthy? etc.
Something you didn't even consider is that perhaps he takes enjoyment from getting a reaction or rise out of people. Congratulations, you played right into his hands.
Who said "right" or "wrong?" Again... I said "sad" and "desperate." Let's not go changing the poll options I gave! It's going to mess up all the crosstabs, and then the media will distort the results of the polling!!@Peter: Who are you to determine what is funny and what is not funny? You might not find 'mom jokes', etc funny as they are not mature enough for you but there are many people out there that do. The thing is everybody has a different kind of sense of humour. There is no right or wrong.
Oh dear.You haven't even met him and yet you have determined beyond reasonable doubt that he has a persecution complex? lol Again, there are people in the world that love attention, some that like the quiet and lots at varying degrees in between - all different personalities. Who out there determines which personality is the 'right' one and which is the 'wrong' one?
What I see here is SN, a younger guy, (who by logic would be less immature then you given age) has pulled a prank on you and you are being an uptight, grumpy old man about it. You are being so high strung about something so little. I think you really, really need to unwind some.
Btw, when was the last time you actually made a joke?
My brain hurts...
But shouldn't I be given the same latitude afforded to SN to make such attempts?
You say I am acting the fool... yet you found foolish behavior exhibited by SN acceptable. Perhaps you should hold me to same comedic standard as SN?
"Moral high ground?" There's really nothing in my post about morality, actually. Nor is there anything that argues about whether his behavior is "acceptable." My adjectives were "sad" and "desperate." Acceptability wasn't really at issue.
And to finish off the dissection, there's really nothing about "societal rungs" in my posts, either... nor is there anything about "dictating what is or is not funny".
While my assessments have, indeed, mentioned comedic value - I believe it's fairly obvious that these are my opinions. Do you disagree that his attempts at "humor" (as you alleged) are the equivalent of "fart noises" and "mom jokes?" That was my assessment. What's yours? Do you think his "humor" ranks higher in value? Really?
I don't.
I mean it's not funny on any sort of comedic level... except for a child maybe.
it demonstrates an unhealthy need
hmmm... I've never seen Peter upset like this before... I'm guessing some nub used the fake script?... I'm sorry... but Peter if thats what happened that is hilarious...lol
'Sad' and 'desperate' are still you being judgemental. Who's to say you making a whole thread relating to his prank isn't a desperate attempt for attention on your part?
Every time you reply to SN, it sounds like you have pulled out the thesaurus and find every big word you can fit into one sentence so that you can speak down to him. It's like you are forever trying to prove how much smarter and more mature you are, but trying too hard equates to over-compensating. Keep in mind he still has like 30 years to catch up to your current maturity.
Then don't read the post, Bella. You injected yourself here. Now you cry about being annoyed? If you don't read it... then you won't be annoyed. Problem solved.This is not about defending him, it is about trying to put myself in others' shoes and you becoming more and more annoying with this.
Again... you have no idea what I may or not may not recall. Perhaps 2 years of immature silliness from SN is about enough he should be allowed to exhibit? What's the saying.... "It takes a village to raise a child." Perhaps the TW community should be helping to raise this young child, rather than allowing him to continue his immature ways. We'd be doing him a service, you know.You forget what it is like to be young - I guess Peter Paine is apt (as opposed to Peter Pan).
Again... Bella, you change the topic. See my earlier outline.PS If this was your idea of a light hearted joke, I apologise. I really, really doubt it was though.
The answer is no, when you assume the higher position, you are then open to criticism from that position. In your post, whether you pretend it or otherwise, you made the assumption that your opinion was superior to his and others. Pot meet kettle doesn't apply when calling out kettle for being kettle.
This is illogical, dude.This suggests that anyone finding his joke funny has the intellect or maturity level of a child. This position assumes you are THE authority on maturity level of jokes, which you are not. Hence the question, where is it that you stand that you are THE authority on humor?
Unacceptable doesn't mean unhealthy. If he engages in unhealthy behavior (like smoking, for example).. that doesn't make it unacceptable.On top of which your post clearly does argue that his actions are unhealthy eg unacceptable when you are actually not in any position to judge this, hence the high ground you are assuming to even suggest it.
I only play doctor with my wife.I'm guessing you must play a doctor or a pastor in several TV shows or films.