DeletedUser
Guest
Koss.
DeletedUser
Guest
I'm astonished.
King Mat the 1st said:
Actually, a person has to really annoy me before I form enough of a grudge to want to single-handedly destroy 'em. As W33 players can testify to. See below. :icon_twisted:
King Mat the 1st said:
I actually challenged someone in w33 to one-on-one. Which can be read here:
http://forum.tribalwars.net/showpost.php?p=3265540&postcount=1
Though to be fair, we were like, a K away from each other, and it was more of a STHU sorta thing, than anything that could really take place. Specially at w33 speeds. :icon_rolleyes:
Pervis suggested the way to take someone on, 1 vs 1, would probably just be to go into a speed round and have at. Actually had quite a few people voluteering to 'monitor' a speed round if the guy I challenged dared to accept, lol. To make sure it was just him vs. me.
He never accepted. :icon_confused:
Point being, it's a nice topic/general discussion, but to really implement it is a slightly different matter.
Anyway. Not sure there's actually anyone here I'd be too interested in going 1 vs 1 on. Maybe Clur. For reasons she should be aware of. :icon_twisted::axemen::icon_twisted:
DeletedUser
Guest
Nah, AsToNiShEd ? is mine. Rawr.
& the fact that you never fought that W33 player totally discredits what you said. :lol:
(I hope my annoyingness is working)
DeletedUser
Guest
Which part of what I said, and how so?
DeletedUser
Guest
Sorry TMH...
Will not attempt answering on your behalf again... :icon_cry:
Will not attempt answering on your behalf again... :icon_cry:
DeletedUser
Guest
It's logic. :icon_rolleyes:
So you never had the fight.
But you never did destroy the W33 player, because you never had that fight. So saying you have challenged someone in W33 means nothing, anyone can issue someone an offer to fight by themselves... you getting me?
So you never had the fight.
But you never did destroy the W33 player, because you never had that fight. So saying you have challenged someone in W33 means nothing, anyone can issue someone an offer to fight by themselves... you getting me?
DeletedUser
Guest
I think you and I differ greatly in our understanding of the concept of logic, in that case.
Lethal Agent said:
Correct...
Lethal Agent said:
Not even remotely.
I never claimed to destroy anyone. All I said was:
- Someone has to annoy me, for me to want to destroy them, 1-on-1.
- Someone in w33 did.
- I issued a challenge.
- W33 players would be aware of that. Hence ... they can testify to the fact that someone has to annoy me, for me to challenge them. Which is quite correct. It was connected to one of the most replied, flamed, and amusing war threads in the forums.
My entire post merely points out that I have to be annoyed to want to challenge someone, someone once annoyed me, and I did indeed challenge. I then just state that a way in which it was suggested such a challenge could be carried out, is in Speed Rounds.
There's not actually anything there that should 'mean something' for you to claim it 'means nothing'. M'aware you seem to take delight in attempting to send antagonistic remarks my way, but... seriously. This s'just beyond redundant. It pains me to continue discussion on this level. M'out.
DeletedUser
Guest
Lol,
Ain't he annoyed you enough now?
Ain't he annoyed you enough now?
DeletedUser
Guest
dude... much as i love ya, i don't swing that way :icon_wink:
Clur
Guest
What a load of rot. Logic?
Logic says you actually can't read the thread in question or what the 1 on 1 challenge was or the motivation and intent behind it was.
Reading the thread back, you have no clue, logic says you have no idea what you are talking about. You really aren't worth the time.
Oh and please bear in mind that Ms Hatter, hasn't actually been playing her account for sometime... Meh.
PS AI you'd beat me. You sleep less
DeletedUser
Guest
Hahahah. Naw. S'all rather pointless. Comical... but pointless. Certainly nothing to work me into a state of agitation. :icon_biggrin:
@ Clur: Lulz. W36 begs to differ.
... well. Not in the sleep thing. But certainly the beating. Maybe in the next suitable speed round that comes out, we can have at. :icon_twisted:
Course that'd mean you'd have to join speed again... -smiles charmingly-
Ooo. Also wouldn't mind 1 vs 1 with Kinoshita. He has learned ze tricks o' ze trade rather quickly. Would like to test how far he's come.
Clur
Guest
*mutters something about vowing never to play speed again*
w36. pointz win prizes!
w36. pointz win prizes!
DeletedUser
Guest
What a load of rot. Logic?
Logic says you actually can't read the thread in question or what the 1 on 1 challenge was or the motivation and intent behind it was.
Reading the thread back, you have no clue, logic says you have no idea what you are talking about. You really aren't worth the time.
Oh and please bear in mind that Ms Hatter, hasn't actually been playing her account for sometime... Meh.
PS AI you'd beat me. You sleep less
Major AI/TMH suckup.
Clur
Guest
If you wish to call me a suck up please feel free. I consider AI a FRIEND and as such I don't feel the need to act different or not defend her if I see fit. There's absoluetely no shame in it. I would do the same for any post I saw that questioned the integrity of someone I trust.
If you had read the post you would see that the suggestion was for a 1 v 1 on speed which wasn't taken up - nothing to do with villages in w33. Logic does not suggest that she was discredited in anyway. The challenge was not accepted. She never claimed to have destroyed anyone. I'm not getting where your logic is coming from at all.
All I'm seeing is someone with a rather petty grudge and someone desparate to get attention from Ms Hatter. I think she's pretty wise to just ignore you for that reason.
If you had read the post you would see that the suggestion was for a 1 v 1 on speed which wasn't taken up - nothing to do with villages in w33. Logic does not suggest that she was discredited in anyway. The challenge was not accepted. She never claimed to have destroyed anyone. I'm not getting where your logic is coming from at all.
All I'm seeing is someone with a rather petty grudge and someone desparate to get attention from Ms Hatter. I think she's pretty wise to just ignore you for that reason.
DeletedUser
Guest
Sorry lethal but Clur seems to have pretty solid logic on that one. Not to say that I'm not still desperately in love with you but yeah...
DeletedUser
Guest
huggles killed this thread
