LastApparatus
Guest
Tu Quoque. What a great logical fallacy. I ask for reports, and you turn it back on me. Too bad anyone with a decent education knows thats a method for circumventing showing any proof of your own by trying to show your opponents lack of proof. Its also an example of the appeal to ignorance fallacy. You see, I'm not the one claiming that I'm attacking a tribe and finding no troops. You are. Which means, as I stated in my original post, the burden of proof is yours. Trying to shove that burden on to me only further shows your desperation to shift attention from your lack of evidence to my lack of evidence. My lack of evidence isn't important, because I don't need evidence: I'm not the one proving a point, you are. Furthermore, since these two logical fallacies make it very clear that you are arguing something with no proof, and are assuming it to be true just because it is what you are arguing, you are begging the question.
So we have three fallacies, easy, without digging too deep.
You might want to google these, too, so you know how to argue properly.
1. Tu Quoque
2. Appeal To Ignorance
3. Begging The Question
So we have three fallacies, easy, without digging too deep.
You might want to google these, too, so you know how to argue properly.
1. Tu Quoque
2. Appeal To Ignorance
3. Begging The Question