Pajuno
Contributing Poster
- Reaction score
- 27
I don't know about T-W-C, but Loonamus has a solid point. It can all be ended with proof. If KBC can prove [DN] attacked them at T-W-C's request, then it is grounded, if not, then it is either an assumption or blatant lie. There is no shame in demanding evidence in the face of accusation. To do so does not make one guilty, quite the contrary, it usually denotes innocence.
Nevertheless, it seems to me more of the much ado about nothing that we generally see when there is nothing else to report; nonsense incubated in boredom, and oft from a losing side.
well, dont you think that i posted that for a relevant reason??
As in, i may or may not have seen this proof already? and am just waiting for the right person to come along and post it?