What i am saying is, outlasting is the same as taking someone out. In the end one stands and the other fell
Your dictionary is messed too. Outlasting someone is nowhere near the same thing as taking someone out. As I repeat myself, (as so often as my opponents make me do........................) Outlasting means you sat idly and did practically nothing to cause the end of the tribe. Taking out means you directly removed them from the game. That's the means, though, not the end.
However, even in the end it doesn't have the same result. Had you taken the other tribe out, it would have resulted in you having their villages. That wasn't the case at all. Prime did not destroy Hulk. I've argued for Prime and for Hulk, but it's impossible for me to believe Hulk nobling 150+ villages off of Prime causes Hulk to be destroyed by Prime:icon_rolleyes:
Hulk is gone. The fact that prime weathered everything that they and WHO? could throw at them over a period of months before the tribe folded is ignored by them.
Some players like to go to a new world a start the Core tribes with their friends from other worlds and then when the game moves on they leave the world and move to other newer ones and repeat the process.
With the tribe gone it seems to leave them with a sense of advanced nostalgia for that time as nobody can say they defeated the tribe. They are in a way then undeafeatable. Like the boxer who retires as soon as he has the belt and then says nobody took it off him...
You will never convince them otherwise so best to leave them with their nostalgia.
Lol, weathering is an accomplishment? "Oh my god, we just weathered Hulk taking 80 villages off of one of our players! We rock!" No offense to Prime and my former tribemates, but that wasn't an accomplishment. The tribe being disbanded isn't necessary for defeat. Even shitty sub-mediocre tribes like G.U.W can manage to not click disband. Not disbanding isn't an accomplishment. That just shows the level this world is at if it's considered one though. A true accomplishment is preventing the loss of those villages.
If you're so good, why weren't you dominating in the beginning? It's a bit hypocritical there. You say that some players quit once they've dominated the world for awhile because of boredom and they claim they're undefeated, yet you say they are just running. How is that true at all? If you were good enough to beat them if they had just stayed another month or two, why couldn't you beat them in the beginning? All I see there is sour grapes that the tribe was so domineering and you could do nothing about it. This paragraph isn't specific to Hulk.
Just because the former best retires/leaves/whatever doesn't make whatevers left better than them.
wll in reality Hulk persay was never defeated. but Kong on the other hand was. and they were 2 different tribes. but with mostof the same players but none of the same leadership. so really hulk never got defeated but kong did. and the only reason they made kong is cuz their leaders quit. if their leaders were still there im sure they wouldve survived even with their mass amount of inactive accounts.
I wouldn't necessarily say it was the leadership that made the tribe change. Leadership in Hulk was passed down from KBK and wizzy to me, but it was still Hulk. I passed it down to bong, and I would've still considered Kong a form of Hulk, but bong merged with GREEN. It was the merge with GREEN that made me consider Kong no longer the same as Hulk, since the tribe memberbase was very different and of lower quality after the merge.
and how could they owned us if .... or ....., or maybe they are owning us with their godish PnPs:-?
